@techreport{KestiMononenLautsoetal.2015, author = {Kesti, Jyrki and Mononen, Tarmo and Lautso, Petteri and D{\"o}ring, Bernd and Reger, Vitali and Holopainen, R. and Jung, N. and Shemeikka, J. and Nieminen, J. and Reda, F. and Lawson, Mark and Botti, Andrea and Hall, R. and Zold, A. and Buday, T.}, title = {Zero energy solutions for multifunctional steel intensive commercial buildings (ZEMUSIC) - EUR 27627}, publisher = {Publications Office of the European Union}, address = {Luxembourg}, organization = {European Commission}, isbn = {978-92-79-54071-4}, issn = {1831-9424}, doi = {10.2777/111520}, pages = {146 Seiten}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The broad commercial objective of this project was the sustainable value creation in steel building technology by addressing the ways in which significant energy reductions can be made in the operation phase of multi-storey commercial buildings. A review on energy efficient commercial buildings in Europe has been carried out consisting of several case studies from different countries. The project included development of zero-energy concepts for reducing energy demand as well as concepts for heating, cooling and ventilation systems by utilising renewable energy sources in three different climates. Also alternative structural frame solutions were developed and analyzed in respect of structural and MEP (mechanical, electrical and plumbing solutions) features. An innovative long span floor system with integrated MEP routings promises a cost effective alternative for sophisticated ventilation distribution and radiant heating and cooling systems, allowing for high energy efficiency and high quality interior climate. The report includes also review of best architectural practices for integrated renewable energy solutions including different design strategies for building facades of zero energy buildings. Interesting results and design basis are also presented for steel energy pile concept, where structural foundation piles are utilized for ground energy harvesting. Life cycle cost calculations for near zero energy office building based on developed technologies show that a near zero energy construction is also profitable. The results and work methods of the project have been summarized in the form of design guidance that offers designers the knowledge gained in a form that can be easily understood.}, language = {en} } @techreport{EschEickmannCoussementetal.2013, author = {Esch, Thomas and Eickmann, Matthias and Coussement, Axel and Kalbhenn, Hartmut}, title = {Wasserstoffspezifische Abstimmung der Ladungswechselvorg{\"a}nge eines Verbrennungsmotors mit Direkteinblasung : Schlussbericht f{\"u}r das Forschungsvorhaben ; Kurztitel: HydI - Hydrogen direct injection ; F{\"o}rderperiode 01.07.2008 - 31.12.2011 / FH Aachen, Thermodynamik und Verbrennungstechnik}, address = {Aachen}, organization = {FH Aachen}, pages = {Online-Ressource (PDF-Datei: 94 S.) : Ill., graph. Darst.}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @techreport{AlbrachtRitzmannKrameretal.2017, author = {Albracht, Kirsten and Ritzmann, Ramona and Kramer, Andreas and Meskemper, Joshua and St{\"a}udle, Benjamin and K{\"u}mmel, Jacob and Freyler, Katrin and Felsenberg, Dieter and Gruber, Marksu and Gollhofer, Albert and Belavy, Daniel}, title = {Vorhaben: Muskelkraftgenerierungsf{\"a}higkeit in Mikrogravitation}, publisher = {Deutsche Sporthochschule K{\"o}ln}, address = {Kl{\"o}n}, doi = {10.2314/KXP:1670327353}, pages = {23 Seiten}, year = {2017}, language = {de} } @techreport{DigelKayser2017, author = {Digel, Ilya and Kayser, Peter}, title = {VirEx - Eliminierung von Quarant{\"a}ne relevanten Viroiden aus Kulturpflanzen Abschlussbericht des Projektes KMU-innovativ-12: Teilprojekt 3}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Bioengineering (IfB) der FH Aachen}, address = {Aachen}, doi = {10.2314/GBV:1012136345}, year = {2017}, language = {de} } @techreport{GeisslerProkopBubneretal.2015, author = {Geißler, Karsten and Prokop, Ines and Bubner, Andr{\´e} and Egner, Ralf and Heyde, Stefan and Kempkes, Marian and K{\"u}hn, Bertram and Laumann, J{\"o}rg and Lieberwirth, Peter and Naumes, Johannes and Ruga, Julija and Schilling, Sivo and Schmidt, Herbert and Ummenhofer, Thomas}, title = {Verbesserung der Praxistauglichkeit der Baunormen durch pr{\"a}normative Arbeit - Teilantrag 3: Stahlbau, Abschlussbericht}, publisher = {Fraunhofer IRB Verlag}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-8167-9539-1}, pages = {130 Seiten}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @techreport{Schleser2011, author = {Schleser, Markus}, title = {Untersuchung des konduktiven R{\"u}hrreibschweißens an Stahl- und Aluminiumwerkstoffen. Schlussbericht. F{\"o}rderkennzeichen: AIF 15687 N}, pages = {87 S.}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @techreport{PisarczykRitzWallenborn2014, author = {Pisarczyk, Rafael and Ritz, Thomas and Wallenborn, Ramona}, title = {Unterschiedliche Entwicklungsans{\"a}tze von Multiplattform-Anwendungen : Markt{\"u}bersicht}, publisher = {eBusiness-Lotse}, address = {Aachen}, pages = {15 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Die Markt{\"u}bersicht „Unterschiedliche Entwicklungsans{\"a}tze von Multiplattform-Anwendungen" richtet sich an IT-Dienstleister, Entwickler und IT-Abteilungen von Unternehmen, die Multiplattform Anwendungen entwickeln. In dieser Markt{\"u}bersicht werden verschiedene Entwicklungsans{\"a}tze beschrieben und ihre jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteile aufgezeigt.}, language = {de} } @techreport{ChristGrossRenz1998, author = {Christ, Ansgar and Groß, Rolf Fritz and Renz, Ulrich}, title = {Str{\"o}mungs-, Filterkuchen- und Abreinigungsmodelle f{\"u}r Heißgasfilter, Teilvorhaben "Numerische Simulation des Abreinigungsvorganges und der Rohgasstr{\"o}mung"}, doi = {10.2314/GBV:50431601X}, pages = {117 Seiten}, year = {1998}, language = {de} } @techreport{ConanD'HaeyerBeguinetal.2006, author = {Conan, Yulian and D'Haeyer, R. and B{\´e}guin, P. and D{\"o}ring, Bernd and Kuhnhenne, Markus and Bayo, E.}, title = {Steel in low-rise building : a symbiosis of cold formed sections and light rolled profiles : final report. Contract-No. 7215-PP/070. EUR 22080 en}, publisher = {Office for Official Publications of the European Communities}, address = {Luxembourg}, isbn = {92-79-02082-X}, pages = {200 S.}, year = {2006}, language = {en} } @techreport{EschFunkeRoosen2010, author = {Esch, Thomas and Funke, Harald and Roosen, Petra}, title = {SIoBiA - Safety Implications of Biofuels in Aviation}, publisher = {EASA}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, pages = {279 Seiten}, year = {2010}, abstract = {Biofuels potentially interesting also for aviation purposes are predominantly liquid fuels produced from biomass. The most common biofuels today are biodiesel and bioethanol. Since diesel engines are rather rare in aviation this survey is focusing on ethanol admixed to gasoline products. The Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of May 8th 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport encourage a growing admixture of biogenic fuel components to fossil automotive gasoline. Some aircraft models equipped with spark ignited piston engines are approved for operation with automotive gasoline, frequently called "MOGAS" (motor gasoline). The majority of those approvals is limited to MOGAS compositions that do not contain methanol or ethanol beyond negligible amounts. In the past years (bio-)MTBE or (bio-)ETBE have been widely used as blending component of automotive gasoline whilst the usage of low-molecular alcohols like methanol or ethanol has been avoided due to the handling problems especially with regard to the strong affinity for water. With rising mandatory bio-admixtures the conversion of the basic biogenic ethanol to ETBE, causing a reduction of energetic payoff, becomes more and more unattractive. Therefore the direct ethanol admixture is accordingly favoured. Due to the national enforcements of the directive 2003/30/EC more oxygenates produced from organic materials like bioethanol have started to appear in automotive gasolines already. The current fuel specification EN 228 already allows up to 3 \% volume per volume (v/v) (bio-)methanol or up to 5 \% v/v (bio-)ethanol as fuel components. This is also roughly the amount of biogenic components to comply with the legal requirements to avoid monetary penalties for producers and distributors of fuels. Since automotive fuel is cheaper than the common aviation gasoline (AVGAS), creates less problems with lead deposits in the engine, and in general produces less pollutants it is strongly favoured by pilots. But being designed for a different set of usage scenarios the use of automotive fuel with low molecular alcohols for aircraft operation may have adverse effects in aviation operation. Increasing amounts of ethanol admixtures impose various changes in the gasoline's chemical and physical properties, some of them rather unexpected and not within the range of flight experiences even of long-term pilots.}, language = {en} }