@article{BeckerDelfmannDietrichetal.2016, author = {Becker, J{\"o}rg and Delfmann, Patrick and Dietrich, Hanns-Alexander and Steinhorst, Matthias and Eggert, Mathias}, title = {Business Process Compliance Checking — Applying and Evaluating a Generic Pattern Matching Approach for Conceptual Models in the Financial Sector}, series = {Information Systems Frontiers}, volume = {18}, journal = {Information Systems Frontiers}, number = {2}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {1572-9419}, doi = {10.1007/s10796-014-9529-y}, pages = {359 -- 405}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Given the strong increase in regulatory requirements for business processes the management of business process compliance becomes a more and more regarded field in IS research. Several methods have been developed to support compliance checking of conceptual models. However, their focus on distinct modeling languages and mostly linear (i.e., predecessor-successor related) compliance rules may hinder widespread adoption and application in practice. Furthermore, hardly any of them has been evaluated in a real-world setting. We address this issue by applying a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models to business process compliance checking in the financial sector. It consists of a model query language, a search algorithm and a corresponding modelling tool prototype. It is (1) applicable for all graph-based conceptual modeling languages and (2) for different kinds of compliance rules. Furthermore, based on an applicability check, we (3) evaluate the approach in a financial industry project setting against its relevance for decision support of audit and compliance management tasks.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{FredebeulKrein2016, author = {Fredebeul-Krein, Markus}, title = {Towards trade facilitation via regulatory convergence: An analysis of the TTIP chapter on Electronic Communications}, series = {Regional ITS Conference of the International Telecommunications Society. Cambridge, United Kingdom, 7-9 September 2016}, booktitle = {Regional ITS Conference of the International Telecommunications Society. Cambridge, United Kingdom, 7-9 September 2016}, pages = {29 Seiten}, year = {2016}, abstract = {To give the exchange of goods and services between the European Union (EU) and the United States (U.S.) new momentum the two parties are currently negotiating the transatlantic free trade agreement Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The aim is to create the largest free trade area in the world. The agreement, once entered into force, will oblige EU countries and the U.S. to further liberalize their markets. The negotiations on TTIP include a chapter on Electronic Communications/ Telecommunications. The challenge therein will be securing commitments for market access to Electronic Communications services. At the same time, these commitments must reflect the legitimate need for consumer protection issues. The need to reduce Electronic Communications-related non-tariff barriers to trade between the Parties is due to the fact that these markets are heavily regulated. Without transnational rules as to regulations national governments can abuse these regulations to deter the market entry by new (foreign) suppliers. Thus the free trade agreement TTIP affects in many respects regulatory provisions on and access to Electronic Communications markets. The objective of this paper is therefore to examine to what extend the regulatory principles for Electronic Communications markets envisaged under TTIP will result in trade facilitation and regulatory convergence between the EU and the U.S. As to this question the result of the analysis is that the chapter on Electronic Communications will be an important step towards facilitating trade in Electronic Communications services. At the same time some regulatory convergence will take place, but this convergence will not lead to a (full) harmonization of regulations. Rather the norm, also after TTIP negotiations will have been concluded successfully, will be mutual recognition of different regulatory regimes. Different regulations being the optimal policy response in different market settings will continue to exist. Moreover, it is very unlikely that such regulatory principles for the Electronic Communications sector are a vehicle for a race to the bottom in levels of consumer protection.}, language = {en} } @book{Siedenbiedel2016, author = {Siedenbiedel, Georg}, title = {F{\"u}hrung international operierender Unternehmen}, series = {Schriftenreihe innovative betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis ; Band 457}, journal = {Schriftenreihe innovative betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis ; Band 457}, publisher = {Kovac}, address = {Hamburg}, isbn = {978-3-8300-9164-6}, pages = {424 Seiten}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @article{Lind2016, author = {Lind, Thorsten Patric}, title = {Zurechenbarkeit des als Mitglied des Aufsichtsrats einer Aktiengesellschaft erlangten Wissens des Prokuristen einer Bank : BGH, Urteil vom 26.04.2016 - XI ZR 108/15 (OLG M{\"u}nchen)}, series = {LMK : kommentierte BGH-Rechtsprechung ; in Zsarb. mit der Neuen Juristischen Wochenschrift / Lindenmaier-M{\"o}hring}, journal = {LMK : kommentierte BGH-Rechtsprechung ; in Zsarb. mit der Neuen Juristischen Wochenschrift / Lindenmaier-M{\"o}hring}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {1611-1095}, pages = {380532}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Mit der vorliegenden, parallel entsprechend in 10 weiteren Verfahren ergangenen Entscheidung behandelte der BGH zum wiederholten Male das Gesch{\"a}ftsmodell der Accessio Wertpapierhandelshaus AG („A AG", fr{\"u}her: Wertpapierhandelshaus Driver \& Bengsch AG). Die klagenden Anleger, zun{\"a}chst nur akquiriert durch ein Tagesgeldkonto mit besonders attraktiven Zinsen, schlossen im Weiteren mit dieser einen Verm{\"o}gensverwaltungsvertrag ab. Zur Abwicklung der Wertpapiergesch{\"a}fte er{\"o}ffneten sie {\"u}ber die A AG zugleich ein Depotkonto bei der beklagten Discount-Brokerin. F{\"u}r dieses erhielt die A AG eine Transaktionsvollmacht. Die Discount-Brokerin schuldete nach den Vertragsdokumenten {\"u}ber die gesetzlichen Aufkl{\"a}rungs- und Erkundigungspflichten bei Auftragsausf{\"u}hrung hinaus keine Anlageberatung („execution-only-business"). Durch nach ihrer Behauptung fehlerhafte Anlageberatung der A AG erlitten die Anleger einen Schaden. In dem Rechtsstreit verlangten sie dessen Ersatz von der Discount-Brokerin, da die A AG zwischenzeitlich insolvent wurde.}, language = {de} } @incollection{SchulteZurhausen2016, author = {Schulte-Zurhausen, Manfred}, title = {Systemisches Management von Organisationsprojekten}, series = {Projekte systemisch managen! Wie Sie soziale und rationale Prozesse in Projekten achtsam steuern}, booktitle = {Projekte systemisch managen! Wie Sie soziale und rationale Prozesse in Projekten achtsam steuern}, editor = {Stelzer-Rothe, Thomas}, publisher = {BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-8305-3647-5}, pages = {9 -- 34}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @article{Bernecker2016, author = {Bernecker, Andreas}, title = {Divided we reform? Evidence from US welfare policies}, series = {Journal of Public Economics}, volume = {142}, journal = {Journal of Public Economics}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0047-2727}, doi = {10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.003}, pages = {24 -- 38}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Divided government is often thought of as causing legislative deadlock. I investigate the link between divided government and economic reforms using a novel data set on welfare reforms in US states between 1978 and 2010. Panel data regressions show that, under divided government, a US state is around 25\% more likely to adopt a welfare reform than under unified government. Several robustness checks confirm this counter-intuitive finding. Case study evidence suggests an explanation based on policy competition between governor, senate, and house.}, language = {en} } @misc{Olbertz2016, author = {Olbertz, Klaus}, title = {Wirksamkeit einer OT-Mitgliedschaft im Arbeitgeberverband - Anforderungen an die Verbandssatzung}, series = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, journal = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, issn = {1868-1816}, pages = {82 -- 82}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @misc{Olbertz2016, author = {Olbertz, Klaus}, title = {Vergabe {\"o}ffentlicher Auftr{\"a}ge kann von der Zahlung eines Mindestlohns abh{\"a}ngig gemacht werden}, series = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, journal = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, issn = {1868-1816}, pages = {103 -- 103}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @misc{Olbertz2016, author = {Olbertz, Klaus}, title = {Abfindungsprogramm nach „Windhundprinzip" ist zul{\"a}ssig}, series = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, journal = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, issn = {1868-1816}, pages = {303 -- 303}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @misc{Olbertz2016, author = {Olbertz, Klaus}, title = {Verwirkung des Widerspruchsrechts beim Betriebs{\"u}bergang}, series = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, journal = {Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht : GWR}, issn = {1868-1816}, pages = {511 -- 511}, year = {2016}, language = {de} }