@inproceedings{GoettenFingerHavermannetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Finger, Felix and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Full Configuration Drag Estimation of Small-to-Medium Range UAVs and its Impact on Initial Sizing Optimization},
  series = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  volume    = {12},
  booktitle = {CEAS Aeronautical Journal},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wien},
  issn      = {1869-5590},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13272-021-00522-w},
  pages     = {589 -- 603},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The paper presents the derivation of a new equivalent skin friction coefficient for estimating the parasitic drag of short-to-medium range fixed-wing unmanned aircraft. The new coefficient is derived from an aerodynamic analysis of ten different unmanned aircraft used on surveillance, reconnaissance, and search and rescue missions. The aircraft are simulated using a validated unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes approach. The UAV's parasitic drag is significantly influenced by the presence of miscellaneous components like fixed landing gears or electro-optical sensor turrets. These components are responsible for almost half of an unmanned aircraft's total parasitic drag. The new equivalent skin friction coefficient accounts for these effects and is significantly higher compared to other aircraft categories. It is used to initially size an unmanned aircraft for a typical reconnaissance mission. The improved parasitic drag estimation yields a much heavier unmanned aircraft when compared to the sizing results using available drag data of manned aircraft.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JungStaat2020,
  author    = {Jung, Alexander and Staat, Manfred},
  title     = {Erratum to "Modeling and simulation of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac tissue" [GAMM-Mitteilungen, (2019), 42, 4, 10.1002/gamm.201900002]},
  series = {GAMM-Mitteilungen},
  volume    = {43},
  journal   = {GAMM-Mitteilungen},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Wiley-VCH GmbH},
  address   = {Weinheim},
  issn      = {1522-2608},
  doi       = {10.1002/gamm.202000011},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RauschKahmannBaltschunetal.2020,
  author    = {Rausch, Valentin and Kahmann, Stephanie Lucina and Baltschun, Christoph and Staat, Manfred and M{\"u}ller, Lars P. and Wegmann, Kilian},
  title     = {Pressure distribution to the distal biceps tendon at the radial tuberosity: a biomechanical study},
  series = {The Journal of Hand Surgery},
  volume    = {45},
  journal   = {The Journal of Hand Surgery},
  number    = {8},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0363-5023},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.006},
  pages     = {776.e1 -- 776.e9},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Mechanical impingement at the narrow radioulnar space of the tuberosity is believed to be an etiological factor in the injury of the distal biceps tendon. The aim of the study was to compare the pressure distribution at the proximal radioulnar space between 2 fixation techniques and the intact state. Methods Six right arms and 6 left arms from 5 female and 6 male frozen specimens were used for this study. A pressure transducer was introduced at the height of the radial tuberosity with the intact distal biceps tendon and after 2 fixation methods: the suture-anchor and the cortical button technique. The force (N), maximum pressure (kPa) applied to the radial tuberosity, and the contact area (mm²) of the radial tuberosity with the ulna were measured and differences from the intact tendon were detected from 60° supination to 60° pronation in 15° increments with the elbow in full extension and in 45° and 90° flexion of the elbow. Results With the distal biceps tendon intact, the pressures during pronation were similar regardless of extension and flexion and were the highest at 60° pronation with 90° elbow flexion (23.3 ± 53.5 kPa). After repair of the tendon, the mean peak pressure, contact area, and total force showed an increase regardless of the fixation technique. Highest peak pressures were found using the cortical button technique at 45° flexion of the elbow and 60° pronation. These differences were significantly different from the intact tendon. The contact area was significantly larger in full extension and 15°, 30°, and 60° pronation using the cortical button technique. Conclusions Pressures on the distal biceps tendon at the radial tuberosity increase during pronation, especially after repair of the tendon. Clinical relevance Mechanical impingement could play a role in both the etiology of primary distal biceps tendon ruptures and the complications occurring after fixation of the tendon using certain techniques.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Spiecker gen. D{\"o}hmann/Bretthauer - Dokumentation zum Datenschutz (2019)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {52 -- 52},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Hansen-Oest - Datenschutzbeauftragte (2020)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {228},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Sydow - Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, Handkommentar (2020)},
  series = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {DSB Datenschutz-Berater},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {DFV Mediengruppe},
  address   = {Frankfurt a.M.},
  issn      = {0170-7256},
  pages     = {76 -- 76},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@inproceedings{FingerBraunBil2020,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Comparative assessment of parallel-hybrid-electric propulsion systems for four different aircraft},
  series = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  booktitle = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2020-1502},
  pages     = {15 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {As battery technologies advance, electric propulsion concepts are on the edge of disrupting aviation markets. However, until electric energy storage systems are ready to allow fully electric aircraft, the combination of combustion engine and electric motor as a hybrid-electric propulsion system seems to be a promising intermediate solution. Consequently, the design space for future aircraft is expanded considerably, as serial-hybrid-, parallel-hybrid-, fully-electric, and conventional propulsion systems must all be considered. While the best propulsion system depends on a multitude of requirements and considerations, trends can be observed for certain types of aircraft and certain types of missions. This paper provides insight into some factors that drive a new design towards either conventional or hybrid propulsion systems. General aviation aircraft, VTOL air taxis, transport aircraft, and UAVs are chosen as case studies. Typical missions for each class are considered, and the aircraft are analyzed regarding their take-off mass and primary energy consumption. For these case studies, a high-level approach is chosen, using an initial sizing methodology. Results indicate that hybrid-electric propulsion systems should be considered if the propulsion system is sized by short-duration power constraints (e.g. take-off, climb). However, if the propulsion system is sized by a continuous power requirement (e.g. cruise), hybrid-electric systems offer hardly any benefit.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Golland2020,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Struggling with users' consent: Economic approach to solve the issue of coupling},
  series = {Turning Point in Data Protection Law},
  booktitle = {Turning Point in Data Protection Law},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-6909-4},
  doi       = {10.5771/9783748921561-121},
  pages     = {121 -- 126},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DachwaldUlamecPostbergetal.2020,
  author    = {Dachwald, Bernd and Ulamec, Stephan and Postberg, Frank and Sohl, Frank and Vera, Jean-Pierre de and Christoph, Waldmann and Lorenz, Ralph D. and Hellard, Hugo and Biele, Jens and Rettberg, Petra},
  title     = {Key technologies and instrumentation for subsurface exploration of ocean worlds},
  series = {Space Science Reviews},
  volume    = {216},
  journal   = {Space Science Reviews},
  number    = {Art. 83},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1572-9672},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11214-020-00707-5},
  pages     = {45},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In this chapter, the key technologies and the instrumentation required for the subsurface exploration of ocean worlds are discussed. The focus is laid on Jupiter's moon Europa and Saturn's moon Enceladus because they have the highest potential for such missions in the near future. The exploration of their oceans requires landing on the surface, penetrating the thick ice shell with an ice-penetrating probe, and probably diving with an underwater vehicle through dozens of kilometers of water to the ocean floor, to have the chance to find life, if it exists. Technologically, such missions are extremely challenging. The required key technologies include power generation, communications, pressure resistance, radiation hardness, corrosion protection, navigation, miniaturization, autonomy, and sterilization and cleaning. Simpler mission concepts involve impactors and penetrators or - in the case of Enceladus - plume-fly-through missions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{KirschMatareFerreinetal.2020,
  author    = {Kirsch, Maximilian and Matar{\´e}, Victor and Ferrein, Alexander and Schiffer, Stefan},
  title     = {Integrating golog++ and ROS for Practical and Portable High-level Control},
  series = {Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2},
  publisher = {SciTePress},
  address   = {Set{\´u}bal, Portugal},
  doi       = {10.5220/0008984406920699},
  pages     = {692 -- 699},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The field of Cognitive Robotics aims at intelligent decision making of autonomous robots. It has matured over the last 25 or so years quite a bit. That is, a number of high-level control languages and architectures have emerged from the field. One concern in this regard is the action language GOLOG. GOLOG has been used in a rather large number of applications as a high-level control language ranging from intelligent service robots to soccer robots. For the lower level robot software, the Robot Operating System (ROS) has been around for more than a decade now and it has developed into the standard middleware for robot applications. ROS provides a large number of packages for standard tasks in robotics like localisation, navigation, and object recognition. Interestingly enough, only little work within ROS has gone into the high-level control of robots. In this paper, we describe our approach to marry the GOLOG action language with ROS. In particular, we present our architecture on inte grating golog++, which is based on the GOLOG dialect Readylog, with the Robot Operating System. With an example application on the Pepper service robot, we show how primitive actions can be easily mapped to the ROS ActionLib framework and present our control architecture in detail.},
  language  = {en}
}