@misc{FrauenrathDieringerPateletal.2011,
  author    = {Frauenrath, Tobias and Dieringer, Matthias and Patel, Nishant and Zerdem, Celal and Hentschel, Jan and Renz, Wolfgang and Niendorf, Thoralf},
  title     = {From Artifact to Merit: Cardiac Gated MRI at 7T \& 3T using Magneto-Hydrodynamic Effects for Synchronization},
  series = {2011 ISMRM Annual Meeting Proceedings},
  journal   = {2011 ISMRM Annual Meeting Proceedings},
  issn      = {1545-4428},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {ECG is corrupted by magneto-hydrodynamic effects at higher magnetic field strength. Artifacts in the ECG trace and severe T-wave elevation might be mis-interpreted as R-waves. MHD being inherently sensitive to blood flow and blood velocity provides an alternative approach for cardiac gating, even in peripheral target areas far away from the commonly used upper torso positions of ECG electrodes. This feature would be very beneficial to address traveling time induced motion artifacts and trigger latency related issues raised by ECG-gated peripheral MR angiography. For all those reasons, this work proposes the use of MHD-trigger for cardiac gated MR.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FrauenrathBeckerHezeletal.2010,
  author    = {Frauenrath, Tobias and Becker, Meike and Hezel, Fabian and Krombach, Gabriele A. and Kremer, Ute and Schulz-Menger, Jeanette and Niendorf, Thoralf},
  title     = {Comparison of Left Function Assessment Using Phonocardiogram and Electrocardiogram Triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR Imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T},
  series = {2010 ISMRM-ESMRMB joint annual meeting},
  journal   = {2010 ISMRM-ESMRMB joint annual meeting},
  issn      = {1545-4428},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {As high-field cardiac MRI (CMR) becomes more widespread the propensity of ECG to distortions and mistriggering increases and with it the motivation for a cardiac triggering alternative. Hence, this study explores the suitability of acoustic cardiac triggering (ACT) for left ventricular (LV) function assessment in healthy subjects at 1.5T and 3.0T.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SattlerRoegerSchwarzboezletal.2020,
  author    = {Sattler, Johannes Christoph and R{\"o}ger, Marc and Schwarzb{\"o}zl, Peter and Buck, Reiner and Macke, Ansgar and Raeder, Christian and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim},
  title     = {Review of heliostat calibration and tracking control methods},
  series = {Solar Energy},
  volume    = {207},
  journal   = {Solar Energy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.030},
  pages     = {110 -- 132},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Large scale central receiver systems typically deploy between thousands to more than a hundred thousand heliostats. During solar operation, each heliostat is aligned individually in such a way that the overall surface normal bisects the angle between the sun's position and the aim point coordinate on the receiver. Due to various tracking error sources, achieving accurate alignment ≤1 mrad for all the heliostats with respect to the aim points on the receiver without a calibration system can be regarded as unrealistic. Therefore, a calibration system is necessary not only to improve the aiming accuracy for achieving desired flux distributions but also to reduce or eliminate spillage. An overview of current larger-scale central receiver systems (CRS), tracking error sources and the basic requirements of an ideal calibration system is presented. Leading up to the main topic, a description of general and specific terms on the topics heliostat calibration and tracking control clarifies the terminology used in this work. Various figures illustrate the signal flows along various typical components as well as the corresponding monitoring or measuring devices that indicate or measure along the signal (or effect) chain. The numerous calibration systems are described in detail and classified in groups. Two tables allow the juxtaposition of the calibration methods for a better comparison. In an assessment, the advantages and disadvantages of individual calibration methods are presented.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{HoffschmidtAlexopoulosRauetal.2022,
  author    = {Hoffschmidt, Bernhard and Alexopoulos, Spiros and Rau, Christoph and Sattler, Johannes Christoph and Anthrakidis, Anette and Teixeira Boura, Cristiano Jos{\´e} and O'Connor, B. and Chico Caminos, Ricardo Alexander and Rend{\´o}n, C. and Hilger, P.},
  title     = {Concentrating solar power},
  series = {Comprehensive Renewable Energy (Second Edition) / Volume 3: Solar Thermal Systems: Components and Applications},
  booktitle = {Comprehensive Renewable Energy (Second Edition) / Volume 3: Solar Thermal Systems: Components and Applications},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  isbn      = {978-0-12-819734-9},
  pages     = {670 -- 724},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The focus of this chapter is the production of power and the use of the heat produced from concentrated solar thermal power (CSP) systems. The chapter starts with the general theoretical principles of concentrating systems including the description of the concentration ratio, the energy and mass balance. The power conversion systems is the main part where solar-only operation and the increase in operational hours. Solar-only operation include the use of steam turbines, gas turbines, organic Rankine cycles and solar dishes. The operational hours can be increased with hybridization and with storage. Another important topic is the cogeneration where solar cooling, desalination and of heat usage is described. Many examples of commercial CSP power plants as well as research facilities from the past as well as current installed and in operation are described in detail. The chapter closes with economic and environmental aspects and with the future potential of the development of CSP around the world.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{MayBreitbachAlexopoulosetal.2019,
  author    = {May, Martin and Breitbach, Gerd and Alexopoulos, Spiros and Latzke, Markus and B{\"a}umer, Klaus and Uhlig, Ralf and S{\"o}hn, Matthias and Teixeira Boura, Cristiano Jos{\´e} and Herrmann, Ulf},
  title     = {Experimental facility for investigations of wire mesh absorbers for pressurized gases},
  series = {AIP Conference Proceedings},
  volume    = {2126},
  booktitle = {AIP Conference Proceedings},
  issn      = {0094243X},
  doi       = {10.1063/1.5117547},
  pages     = {030035-1 -- 030035-9},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GeimerSauerbornHoffschmidtetal.2010,
  author    = {Geimer, Konstantin and Sauerborn, Markus and Hoffschmidt, Bernhard and Schmitz, Mark and G{\"o}ttsche, Joachim},
  title     = {Test Facility for Absorber Specimens of Solar Tower Power Plants},
  series = {Advances in Science and Technology. 74 (2010)},
  journal   = {Advances in Science and Technology. 74 (2010)},
  pages     = {266 -- 271},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RuppHandschuhRiekeetal.2019,
  author    = {Rupp, Matthias and Handschuh, Nils and Rieke, Christian and Kuperjans, Isabel},
  title     = {Contribution of country-specific electricity mix and charging time to environmental impact of battery electric vehicles: A case study of electric buses in Germany},
  series = {Applied Energy},
  volume    = {237},
  journal   = {Applied Energy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0306-2619},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.059},
  pages     = {618 -- 634},
  year      = {2019},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{BraunerVervierBrillowskietal.2022,
  author    = {Brauner, Philipp and Vervier, Luisa and Brillowski, Florian and Dammers, Hannah and Steuer-Dankert, Linda and Schneider, Sebastian and Baier, Ralph and Ziefle, Martina and Gries, Thomas and Leicht-Scholten, Carmen and Mertens, Alexander and Nagel, Saskia K.},
  title     = {Organization Routines in Next Generation Manufacturing},
  series = {Forecasting Next Generation Manufacturing},
  booktitle = {Forecasting Next Generation Manufacturing},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-07734-0},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-07734-0_5},
  pages     = {75 -- 94},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Next Generation Manufacturing promises significant improvements in performance, productivity, and value creation. In addition to the desired and projected improvements regarding the planning, production, and usage cycles of products, this digital transformation will have a huge impact on work, workers, and workplace design. Given the high uncertainty in the likelihood of occurrence and the technical, economic, and societal impacts of these changes, we conducted a technology foresight study, in the form of a real-time Delphi analysis, to derive reliable future scenarios featuring the next generation of manufacturing systems. This chapter presents the organization dimension and describes each projection in detail, offering current case study examples and discussing related research, as well as implications for policy makers and firms. Specifically, we highlight seven areas in which the digital transformation of production will change how we work, how we organize the work within a company, how we evaluate these changes, and how employment and labor rights will be affected across company boundaries. The experts are unsure whether the use of collaborative robots in factories will replace traditional robots by 2030. They believe that the use of hybrid intelligence will supplement human decision-making processes in production environments. Furthermore, they predict that artificial intelligence will lead to changes in management processes, leadership, and the elimination of hierarchies. However, to ensure that social and normative aspects are incorporated into the AI algorithms, restricting measurement of individual performance will be necessary. Additionally, AI-based decision support can significantly contribute toward new, socially accepted modes of leadership. Finally, the experts believe that there will be a reduction in the workforce by the year 2030.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{ButenwegGellertReindletal.2009,
  author    = {Butenweg, Christoph and Gellert, Christoph and Reindl, Lukas and Meskouris, Konstantin},
  title     = {A nonlinear method for the seismic safety verification of masonry buildings},
  publisher = {National Technical University of Athens},
  address   = {Athen},
  year      = {2009},
  abstract  = {In order for traditional masonry to stay a competitive building material in seismically active regions there is an urgent demand for modern, deformation-based verification procedures which exploit the nonlinear load bearing reserves. The Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM) is a widely accepted design approach in the field of reinforced concrete and steel construction. It compares the seismic action with the load-bearing capacity of the building considering nonlinear material behavior with its post-peak capacity. The bearing capacity of the building is calculated iteratively using single wall capacity curves. This paper presents a new approach for the bilinear approximation of single wall capacity curves in the style of EC6/EC8 respectively FEMA 306/FEMA 356 based on recent shear wall test results of the European Collective-Research Project "ESECMaSE". The application of the CSM to masonry structures by using bilinear approximations of capacity curves as input is demonstrated on the example of a typical German residential home.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{StollenwerkRiekeDahmenetal.2016,
  author    = {Stollenwerk, Dominik and Rieke, Christian and Dahmen, Markus and Pieper, Martin},
  title     = {Biogas Production Modelling : A Control System Engineering Approach},
  series = {IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Bd. 32},
  booktitle = {IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Bd. 32},
  issn      = {1755-1315},
  doi       = {10.1088/1755-1315/32/1/012008},
  pages     = {012008/1 -- 012008/4},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}