@article{KreyerMuellerEsch2020,
  author    = {Kreyer, J{\"o}rg and M{\"u}ller, Marvin and Esch, Thomas},
  title     = {A Calculation Methodology for Predicting Exhaust Mass Flows and Exhaust Temperature Profiles for Heavy-Duty Vehicles},
  series = {SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {SAE International},
  address   = {Warrendale, Pa.},
  issn      = {1946-3928},
  doi       = {10.4271/02-13-02-0009},
  pages     = {129 -- 143},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The predictive control of commercial vehicle energy management systems, such as vehicle thermal management or waste heat recovery (WHR) systems, are discussed on the basis of information sources from the field of environment recognition and in combination with the determination of the vehicle system condition. In this article, a mathematical method for predicting the exhaust gas mass flow and the exhaust gas temperature is presented based on driving data of a heavy-duty vehicle. The prediction refers to the conditions of the exhaust gas at the inlet of the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) cooler and at the outlet of the exhaust gas aftertreatment system (EAT). The heavy-duty vehicle was operated on the motorway to investigate the characteristic operational profile. In addition to the use of road gradient profile data, an evaluation of the continuously recorded distance signal, which represents the distance between the test vehicle and the road user ahead, is included in the prediction model. Using a Fourier analysis, the trajectory of the vehicle speed is determined for a defined prediction horizon. To verify the method, a holistic simulation model consisting of several hierarchically structured submodels has been developed. A map-based submodel of a combustion engine is used to determine the EGR and EAT exhaust gas mass flows and exhaust gas temperature profiles. All simulation results are validated on the basis of the recorded vehicle and environmental data. Deviations from the predicted values are analyzed and discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Wind-tunnel and CFD investigations of UAV landing gears and turrets - Improvements in empirical drag estimation},
  series = {Aerospace Science and Technology},
  volume    = {107},
  journal   = {Aerospace Science and Technology},
  number    = {Art. 106306},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1270-9638},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ast.2020.106306},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper analyzes the drag characteristics of several landing gear and turret configurations that are representative of unmanned aircraft tricycle landing gears and sensor turrets. A variety of these components were constructed via 3D-printing and analyzed in a wind-tunnel measurement campaign. Both turrets and landing gears were attached to a modular fuselage that supported both isolated components and multiple components at a time. Selected cases were numerically investigated with a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approach that showed good accuracy when compared to wind-tunnel data. The drag of main gear struts could be significantly reduced via streamlining their cross-sectional shape and keeping load carrying capabilities similar. The attachment of wheels introduced interference effects that increased strut drag moderately but significantly increased wheel drag compared to isolated cases. Very similar behavior was identified for front landing gears. The drag of an electro-optical and infrared sensor turret was found to be much higher than compared to available data of a clean hemisphere-cylinder combination. This turret drag was merely influenced by geometrical features like sensor surfaces and the rotational mechanism. The new data of this study is used to develop simple drag estimation recommendations for main and front landing gear struts and wheels as well as sensor turrets. These recommendations take geometrical considerations and interference effects into account.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GoettenHavermannBraunetal.2020,
  author    = {G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc and Braun, Carsten and Marino, Matthew and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Improved Form Factor for Drag Estimation of Fuselages with Various Cross Sections},
  series = {Journal of Aircraft},
  journal   = {Journal of Aircraft},
  publisher = {AIAA},
  address   = {Reston, Va.},
  issn      = {1533-3868},
  doi       = {10.2514/1.C036032},
  pages     = {1 -- 13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The paper presents an aerodynamic investigation of 70 different streamlined bodies with fineness ratios ranging from 2 to 10. The bodies are chosen to idealize both unmanned and small manned aircraft fuselages and feature cross-sectional shapes that vary from circular to quadratic. The study focuses on friction and pressure drag in dependency of the individual body's fineness ratio and cross section. The drag forces are normalized with the respective body's wetted area to comply with an empirical drag estimation procedure. Although the friction drag coefficient then stays rather constant for all bodies, their pressure drag coefficients decrease with an increase in fineness ratio. Referring the pressure drag coefficient to the bodies' cross-sectional areas shows a distinct pressure drag minimum at a fineness ratio of about three. The pressure drag of bodies with a quadratic cross section is generally higher than for bodies of revolution. The results are used to derive an improved form factor that can be employed in a classic empirical drag estimation method. The improved formulation takes both the fineness ratio and cross-sectional shape into account. It shows superior accuracy in estimating streamlined body drag when compared with experimental data and other form factor formulations of the literature.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FingerBraunBil2020,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {Comparative assessment of parallel-hybrid-electric propulsion systems for four different aircraft},
  series = {Journal of Aircraft},
  volume    = {57},
  journal   = {Journal of Aircraft},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {AIAA},
  address   = {Reston, Va.},
  issn      = {1533-3868},
  doi       = {10.2514/1.C035897},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Until electric energy storage systems are ready to allow fully electric aircraft, the combination of combustion engine and electric motor as a hybrid-electric propulsion system seems to be a promising intermediate solution. Consequently, the design space for future aircraft is expanded considerably, as serial hybrid-electric, parallel hybrid-electric, fully electric, and conventional propulsion systems must all be considered. While the best propulsion system depends on a multitude of requirements and considerations, trends can be observed for certain types of aircraft and certain types of missions. This Paper provides insight into some factors that drive a new design toward either conventional or hybrid propulsion systems. General aviation aircraft, regional transport aircraft vertical takeoff and landing air taxis, and unmanned aerial vehicles are chosen as case studies. Typical missions for each class are considered, and the aircraft are analyzed regarding their takeoff mass and primary energy consumption. For these case studies, a high-level approach is chosen, using an initial sizing methodology. Only parallel-hybrid-electric powertrains are taken into account. Aeropropulsive interaction effects are neglected. Results indicate that hybrid-electric propulsion systems should be considered if the propulsion system is sized by short-duration power constraints. However, if the propulsion system is sized by a continuous power requirement, hybrid-electric systems offer hardly any benefit.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{GeibenGoettenHavermann2020,
  author    = {Geiben, Benedikt and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Havermann, Marc},
  title     = {Aerodynamic analysis of a winged sub-orbital spaceplane},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HippeFingerGoettenetal.2020,
  author    = {Hippe, Jonas and Finger, Felix and G{\"o}tten, Falk and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Propulsion System Qualification of a 25 kg VTOL-UAV: Hover Performance of Single and Coaxial Rotors and Wind-Tunnel Experiments on Cruise Propellers},
  series = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  booktitle = {Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress - DLRK 2020},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GazdaMaurischat2020,
  author    = {Gazda, Quentin and Maurischat, Andreas},
  title     = {Special functions and Gauss-Thakur sums in higher rank and dimension},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  pages     = {26 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{ThomaFisherBraun2020,
  author    = {Thoma, Andreas and Fisher, Alex and Braun, Carsten},
  title     = {Improving the px4 avoid algorithm by bio-inspired flight strategies},
  series = {DLRK2020 - „Luft- und Raumfahrt - Verantwortung in allen Dimensionen"},
  booktitle = {DLRK2020 - „Luft- und Raumfahrt - Verantwortung in allen Dimensionen"},
  pages     = {10 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{HauggKreyerKemperetal.2020,
  author    = {Haugg, Albert Thomas and Kreyer, J{\"o}rg and Kemper, Hans and Hatesuer, Katerina and Esch, Thomas},
  title     = {Heat exchanger for ORC. adaptability and optimisation potentials},
  series = {IIR International Rankine 2020 Conference},
  booktitle = {IIR International Rankine 2020 Conference},
  doi       = {10.18462/iir.rankine.2020.1224},
  pages     = {10 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The recovery of waste heat requires heat exchangers to extract it from a liquid or gaseous medium into another working medium, a refrigerant. In Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) on Combustion Engines there are two major heat sources, the exhaust gas and the water/glycol fluid from the engine's cooling circuit. A heat exchanger design must be adapted to the different requirements and conditions resulting from the heat sources, fluids, system configurations, geometric restrictions, and etcetera. The Stacked Shell Cooler (SSC) is a new and very specific design of a plate heat exchanger, created by AKG, which allows with a maximum degree of freedom the optimization of heat exchange rate and the reduction of the related pressure drop. This optimization in heat exchanger design for ORC systems is even more important, because it reduces the energy consumption of the system and therefore maximizes the increase in overall efficiency of the engine.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{FingerdeVriesVosetal.2020,
  author    = {Finger, Felix and de Vries, Reynard and Vos, Roelof and Braun, Carsten and Bil, Cees},
  title     = {A comparison of hybrid-electric aircraft sizing methods},
  series = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  booktitle = {AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum},
  doi       = {10.2514/6.2020-1006},
  pages     = {31 Seiten},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}