@incollection{Finkenberger2018,
  author    = {Finkenberger, Isabel Maria},
  title     = {Die Stadt als st{\"a}dtisch-theatrale Versuchsanordnung: Wie wollen wir in Zukunft leben und welche Stadt brauchen wir daf{\"u}r?},
  series = {Un/Certain Futures - Rollen des Designs in gesellschaftlichen Transformationsprozessen},
  booktitle = {Un/Certain Futures - Rollen des Designs in gesellschaftlichen Transformationsprozessen},
  publisher = {transcript},
  address   = {Bielefeld},
  isbn      = {9783839443323},
  doi       = {https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839443323-009},
  pages     = {86 -- 95},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@techreport{Drescher2018,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Drescher, Hans Paul},
  title     = {The irreversible thermodynamic's theorem of minimum entropy production applied to the laminar and the turbulent Couette flow},
  pages     = {48 Seiten},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Analyzing thermodynamic non-equilibrium processes, like the laminar and turbulent fluid flow, the dissipation is a key parameter with a characteristic minimum condition. That is applied to characterize laminar and turbulent behaviour of the Couette flow, including its transition in both directions. The Couette flow is chosen as the only flow form with constant shear stress over the flow profile, being laminar, turbulent or both. The local dissipation defines quantitative and stable criteria for the transition and the existence of turbulence. There are basic results: The Navier Stokes equations cannot describe the experimental flow profiles of the turbulent Couette flow. But they are used to quantify the dissipation of turbulent fluctuation. The dissipation minimum requires turbulent structures reaching maximum macroscopic dimensions, describing turbulence as a "non-local" phenomenon. At the transition the Couette flow profiles and the shear stress change by a factor ≅ 5 due to a change of the "apparent" turbulent viscosity by a calculated factor ≅ 27. The resulting difference of the laminar and the turbulent profiles results in two different Reynolds numbers and different loci of transition, which are identified by calculation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HarrisKleefeld2018,
  author    = {Harris, Isaac and Kleefeld, Andreas},
  title     = {The inverse scattering problem for a conductive boundary condition and transmission eigenvalues},
  series = {Applicable Analysis},
  volume    = {99},
  journal   = {Applicable Analysis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1563-504X},
  doi       = {10.1080/00036811.2018.1504028},
  pages     = {508 -- 529},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In this paper, we consider the inverse scattering problem associated with an inhomogeneous media with a conductive boundary. In particular, we are interested in two problems that arise from this inverse problem: the inverse conductivity problem and the corresponding interior transmission eigenvalue problem. The inverse conductivity problem is to recover the conductive boundary parameter from the measured scattering data. We prove that the measured scatted data uniquely determine the conductivity parameter as well as describe a direct algorithm to recover the conductivity. The interior transmission eigenvalue problem is an eigenvalue problem associated with the inverse scattering of such materials. We investigate the convergence of the eigenvalues as the conductivity parameter tends to zero as well as prove existence and discreteness for the case of an absorbing media. Lastly, several numerical and analytical results support the theory and we show that the inside-outside duality method can be used to reconstruct the interior conductive eigenvalues.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Fabo2018,
  author    = {Fabo, Sabine},
  title     = {Einspr{\"u}che gegen den informierten Himmel ; Wegsehen; Distanzschaffen, Spielen},
  series = {Orbitale Irritationen / Herausgeber: REMOTEWORDS: Achim Mohn{\´e} \& Uta Kopp},
  booktitle = {Orbitale Irritationen / Herausgeber: REMOTEWORDS: Achim Mohn{\´e} \& Uta Kopp},
  publisher = {Herbert von Halem Verlag},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  isbn      = {978-3-86962-302-3},
  pages     = {20 -- 45},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Fabo2018,
  author    = {Fabo, Sabine},
  title     = {Eine dekonstruktive Erinnerungsarbeit},
  series = {Doris Frohnapfel, bewaffnete G{\"o}tter = Doris Frohnapfel, armed gods},
  booktitle = {Doris Frohnapfel, bewaffnete G{\"o}tter = Doris Frohnapfel, armed gods},
  publisher = {RpB Richter-Br{\"u}ckner},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  isbn      = {978-3-9817241-2-7},
  pages     = {31 -- 35},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@techreport{FischedickSchoofHebeletal.2018,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Fischedick, Manfred and Schoof, Ren{\´e} and Hebel, Christoph and Merkens, Torsten},
  title     = {Sektorenkopplung als Herausforderung und Chance f{\"u}r das Energieland NRW : Handlungsoptionen und Ergebnispapier der Expertengruppe AG 4 „Sektoren- kopplung" im Netzwerk Netze und Speicher der EnergieAgentur.NRW im Auftrag des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen / EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH},
  pages     = {68 Seiten},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Finkenberger2018,
  author    = {Finkenberger, Isabel Maria},
  title     = {Schwellenreiten},
  series = {Prozesse reflexiven Entwerfens : Entwerfen und Forschen in Architektur und Landschaft},
  booktitle = {Prozesse reflexiven Entwerfens : Entwerfen und Forschen in Architektur und Landschaft},
  editor    = {Buchert, Margitta},
  publisher = {JOVIS Verlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86859-558-1},
  pages     = {208 -- 226},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Kurz2018,
  author    = {Kurz, Melanie},
  title     = {Designstreit : exemplarische Kontroversen {\"u}ber Gestaltung},
  publisher = {Wilhelm Fink},
  address   = {Paderborn},
  isbn      = {978-3-7705-6294-7 (Druckausgabe)},
  pages     = {304 Seiten},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Die Geschichte des Designs ist ges{\"a}umt von Auseinandersetzungen. Debattiert wird unter Berufsgenossen, in Interessensverb{\"a}nden, zwischen Wettbewerbern und nicht zuletzt an Hochschulen; als Foren dienen zum Beispiel Zeitungen, Konferenzen oder Gerichtss{\"a}le. Doch welche Gr{\"u}nde gibt es f{\"u}r Streit {\"u}ber Design? Die Kontroversen beschr{\"a}nken sich keineswegs auf die {\"A}sthetik von Artefakten. Auch haben wir es trotz der Vielfalt an Streitf{\"a}llen nicht mit einem un{\"u}berschaubaren Feld von zusammenhanglosen Einzelereignissen zu tun. Wie das vorliegende Buch anhand historischer Kontroversen zeigt, lassen sich im Bereich der Gestaltung Streitkategorien identifizieren. Die Diskursanalyse verr{\"a}t, dass sich die Konfliktursachen im Verlauf der Designhistorie kaum ver{\"a}ndern. So haben die angef{\"u}hrten Dispute erstaunliche {\"A}hnlichkeit mit aktuellen Debatten im Fach. Sie sind Lehrst{\"u}cke und k{\"o}nnen dazu anregen, eine Streitkultur im Design zu etablieren, die sich davon distanziert, den Meinungsgegner in ein politisches Lager zu ›verr{\"a}umen‹.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kurz2018,
  author    = {Kurz, Melanie},
  title     = {Was heißt: Verantwortung im Design? Historische Positionen},
  series = {Boxhorn: das Magazin aus dem Fachbereich Gestaltung der FH Aachen},
  journal   = {Boxhorn: das Magazin aus dem Fachbereich Gestaltung der FH Aachen},
  number    = {34},
  address   = {Aachen},
  pages     = {26 -- 33},
  year      = {2018},
  language  = {de}
}