@incollection{Timme2022,
  author    = {Timme, Michael},
  title     = {Wettbewerbsregeln (\S\S 24-27)},
  series = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum europ{\"a}ischen und deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht : Kartellrecht, Beihilfenrecht, Vergaberecht / hrsg von Franz J{\"u}rgen S{\"a}cker / Band 2: Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschr{\"a}nkungen (GWB), \S\S 1-96, 185, 186},
  booktitle = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum europ{\"a}ischen und deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht : Kartellrecht, Beihilfenrecht, Vergaberecht / hrsg von Franz J{\"u}rgen S{\"a}cker / Band 2: Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschr{\"a}nkungen (GWB), \S\S 1-96, 185, 186},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-75876-8},
  pages     = {589 -- 608},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EmhardtJarodzkaBrandGruweletal.2022,
  author    = {Emhardt, Selina N. and Jarodzka, Halszka and Brand-Gruwel, Saskia and Drumm, Christian and Niehorster, Diederick C. and van Gog, Tamara},
  title     = {What is my teacher talking about? Effects of displaying the teacher's gaze and mouse cursor cues in video lectures on students' learning},
  series = {Journal of Cognitive Psychology},
  journal   = {Journal of Cognitive Psychology},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {2044-5911},
  doi       = {10.1080/20445911.2022.2080831},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Eye movement modelling examples (EMME) are instructional videos that display a teacher's eye movements as "gaze cursor" (e.g. a moving dot) superimposed on the learning task. This study investigated if previous findings on the beneficial effects of EMME would extend to online lecture videos and compared the effects of displaying the teacher's gaze cursor with displaying the more traditional mouse cursor as a tool to guide learners' attention. Novices (N = 124) studied a pre-recorded video lecture on how to model business processes in a 2 (mouse cursor absent/present) × 2 (gaze cursor absent/present) between-subjects design. Unexpectedly, we did not find significant effects of the presence of gaze or mouse cursors on mental effort and learning. However, participants who watched videos with the gaze cursor found it easier to follow the teacher. Overall, participants responded positively to the gaze cursor, especially when the mouse cursor was not displayed in the video.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Timme2022,
  author    = {Timme, Michael},
  title     = {Beweislast beim gutgl{\"a}ubigen Erwerb eines Kraftfahrzeugs ohne Erhalt der Zulassungsbescheinigung Teil II — Zugleich eine Besprechung von BGH, Urt. v. 23.9.2022 - V ZR 148/21, MDR 2022, 1542},
  series = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r Deutsches Recht},
  volume    = {77},
  journal   = {Monatsschrift f{\"u}r Deutsches Recht},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln},
  issn      = {0340-1812},
  doi       = {doi.org/10.9785/mdtr-2023-770102},
  pages     = {r5 -- r7},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Im Handel mit Kraftfahrzeugen geh{\"o}ren Aspekte des gutgl{\"a}ubigen Erwerbs zu den beinahe allt{\"a}glichen Standardproblemen. Der BGH f{\"u}gt in seiner Entscheidung v. 23.9.2022-VZR148/21, MDR 2022, 1541 diesem im Detail breit gef{\"a}cherten Themenfeld einen weiteren Mosaikstein hinzu: Der Erwerber erhielt das verkaufte Kfz ohne {\"U}bergabe einer Zulassungsbescheinigung Teil II, behauptet aber, diese Bescheinigung sei dem vom ihm eingeschalteten Vermittler bei Erwerb (als F{\"a}lschung) vorgelegt worden. Tats{\"a}chlich befand sich das Original durchg{\"a}ngig beim wahren Eigent{\"u}mer, der nunmehr Herausgabe des Fahrzeugs verlangt. Der BGH sch{\"u}tzt in dieser Gestaltung im Ergebnis den Erwerber. Die Entscheidung ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht bemerkenswert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KemptFreyerNagel2022,
  author    = {Kempt, Hendrik and Freyer, Nils and Nagel, Saskia K.},
  title     = {Justice and the normative standards of explainability in healthcare},
  series = {Philosophy \& Technology},
  volume    = {35},
  journal   = {Philosophy \& Technology},
  number    = {Article number: 100},
  publisher = {Springer Nature},
  address   = {Berlin},
  doi       = {10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0},
  pages     = {1 -- 19},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Golland2022,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Kommentierung von \S 7 Telekommunikation-Telemedien-Datenschutzgesetz},
  series = {TTDSG},
  booktitle = {TTDSG},
  editor    = {Riechert, Anne and Wilmer, Thomas},
  publisher = {Erich Schmidt},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-503-20978-1},
  pages     = {145 -- 151},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Golland2022,
  author    = {Golland, Alexander},
  title     = {Kommentierung von \S 26 Telekommunikation-Telemedien-Datenschutzgesetz},
  series = {TTDSG},
  booktitle = {TTDSG},
  editor    = {Riechert, Anne and Wilmer, Thomas},
  publisher = {Erich Schmidt},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-503-20978-1},
  pages     = {439 -- 474},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}