@article{KrollLudwigs2015, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Anmerkung zu OLG M{\"u}nchen: Erbscheinserteilung nach Eintritt des Nacherbfalls, Beschl. v. 1.10.2014 - Wx 314/14}, series = {DNotZ - Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift}, journal = {DNotZ - Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift}, number = {5}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, issn = {0340-8604}, pages = {385 -- 390}, year = {2015}, language = {de} } @incollection{KrollLudwigs2017, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Einleitung vor \S 1297}, series = {B{\"u}rgerliches Gesetzbuch : Handkommentar mit AGG, EGBGB (Auszug), ErbbauRG, HausratsVO, LPartG, ProdHaftG, UKlaG, VAHRG und WEG}, booktitle = {B{\"u}rgerliches Gesetzbuch : Handkommentar mit AGG, EGBGB (Auszug), ErbbauRG, HausratsVO, LPartG, ProdHaftG, UKlaG, VAHRG und WEG}, editor = {Erman, Walter and Grunewald, Barbara and Maier-Reimer, Georg}, edition = {15., neu bearbeitete Auflage}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, isbn = {978-3-504-47103-3}, pages = {4415 -- 4422}, year = {2017}, language = {de} } @incollection{KrollLudwigs2017, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Vorbemerkung vor \S 1297}, series = {B{\"u}rgerliches Gesetzbuch : Handkommentar mit AGG, EGBGB (Auszug), ErbbauRG, HausratsVO, LPartG, ProdHaftG, UKlaG, VAHRG und WEG}, booktitle = {B{\"u}rgerliches Gesetzbuch : Handkommentar mit AGG, EGBGB (Auszug), ErbbauRG, HausratsVO, LPartG, ProdHaftG, UKlaG, VAHRG und WEG}, editor = {Erman, Walter and Grunewald, Barbara and Maier-Reimer, Georg}, edition = {15., neu bearbeitete Auflage}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, isbn = {978-3-504-47103-3}, pages = {4422 -- 4424}, year = {2017}, language = {de} } @incollection{KrollLudwigs2017, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Vorbemerkung vor \S 1353}, series = {B{\"u}rgerliches Gesetzbuch : Handkommentar mit AGG, EGBGB (Auszug), ErbbauRG, HausratsVO, LPartG, ProdHaftG, UKlaG, VAHRG und WEG}, booktitle = {B{\"u}rgerliches Gesetzbuch : Handkommentar mit AGG, EGBGB (Auszug), ErbbauRG, HausratsVO, LPartG, ProdHaftG, UKlaG, VAHRG und WEG}, editor = {Ermann, Walter and Grunewald, Barbara and Maier-Reimer, Georg}, edition = {15., neu bearbeitete Auflage}, publisher = {Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt}, address = {K{\"o}ln}, isbn = {978-3-504-47103-3}, pages = {4456 -- 4464}, year = {2017}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigsLudwigs2009, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin and Ludwigs, Markus}, title = {Die richtlinienkonforme Rechtsfortbildung im Gesamtsystem der Richtlinienwirkungen : Zugleich Besprechung von BGH, Urt. v. 26.11.2008 - VIII ZR 200/05 (Quelle) [Teil 1]}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das juristische Studium / ZJS}, volume = {2}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das juristische Studium / ZJS}, number = {1}, publisher = {T. Rotsch}, address = {Gießen}, issn = {1865-6331}, pages = {7 -- 14}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigsLudwigs2009, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin and Ludwigs, Markus}, title = {Die richtlinienkonforme Rechtsfortbildung im Gesamtsystem der Richtlinienwirkungen Zugleich Besprechung von BGH, Urt. v. 26.11.2008 - VIII ZR 200/05 (Quelle) [Teil 2]}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das juristische Studium / ZJS}, volume = {2}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r das juristische Studium / ZJS}, number = {2}, publisher = {T. Rotsch}, address = {Gießen}, issn = {1865-6331}, pages = {123 -- 130}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @incollection{KrollLudwigs2008, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Unification of Conflict of Laws in Europe. Matrimonial Property Regimes}, series = {European Challenges in Contemporary Family Law}, booktitle = {European Challenges in Contemporary Family Law}, editor = {Boele-Woelki, Katharina}, publisher = {Intersentia}, address = {Antwerpen}, isbn = {978-90-5095-692-5}, pages = {379 -- 393}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @article{KrollLudwigs2008, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Vertragserf{\"u}llung als zeitliche Grenze des verbrauchersch{\"u}tzenden Widerrufsrechts}, series = {Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW)}, volume = {61}, journal = {Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW)}, number = {28}, issn = {0341-1907}, pages = {1999 -- 2002}, year = {2008}, language = {de} } @article{KrollLudwigs2008, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Hinkende Namensrechtsverh{\"a}ltnisse im Fokus der gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Freiz{\"u}gigkeit}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (ZVglRWiss)}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (ZVglRWiss)}, number = {3}, issn = {0044-3638}, pages = {320 -- 341}, year = {2008}, language = {de} } @article{DethloffKrollLudwigs2009, author = {Dethloff, Nina and Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {A Lei de Parceria Registrada de 2001 e suas Reformas no Direito Alemao}, series = {Revista Brasileira de Direito das Fam{\´i}lias e Sucessoes}, volume = {11}, journal = {Revista Brasileira de Direito das Fam{\´i}lias e Sucessoes}, number = {12}, pages = {80 -- 94}, year = {2009}, language = {de} } @book{KrollLudwigs2004, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Zwischen Vertragsfreiheit und Inhaltskontrolle - zur Frage der Wirksamkeit vorehelicher Unterhaltsverzichte : eine rechtsvergleichende Betrachtung des deutschen und kalifornischen Rechts}, publisher = {Roderer}, address = {Regensburg}, isbn = {3-89783-409-X}, pages = {V, 268 S.}, year = {2004}, language = {de} } @book{KrollLudwigs2013, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Die Rolle der Parteiautonomie im europ{\"a}ischen Kollisionsrecht}, publisher = {Mohr Siebeck}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, isbn = {978-3-16-151950-5}, pages = {XXXI, 668 S.}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @incollection{KrollLudwigs2005, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Rechtssicherheit oder Verwirrspiel? - Die Beurteilung vorehelicher Unterhaltsverzichte nach dem Urteil des BGH vom 11.2.2004}, series = {Liber amicorum : Thomas Rauscher zum 50. Geburtstag}, booktitle = {Liber amicorum : Thomas Rauscher zum 50. Geburtstag}, editor = {Kosmehl, Guido}, publisher = {Ille und Riemer}, address = {Leipzig}, isbn = {3936308721}, pages = {95 -- 113}, year = {2005}, language = {de} } @incollection{KrollLudwigs2006, author = {Kroll-Ludwigs, Kathrin}, title = {Selbstverantwortung oder Vertrauenshaftung? - Anwendung von \S 311 II Nr. 1 BGB (c.i.c.) auf Ehevertr{\"a}ge und Angeh{\"o}rigenb{\"u}rgschaften}, series = {Verantwortung und Haftung : Leipziger Tagung, 6. bis 9. September 2006 ; Jahrbuch Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler 2006 ; [17. Tagung der Gesellschaft Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler e.V.]}, booktitle = {Verantwortung und Haftung : Leipziger Tagung, 6. bis 9. September 2006 ; Jahrbuch Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler 2006 ; [17. Tagung der Gesellschaft Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler e.V.]}, editor = {Staake, Marco}, organization = {Gesellschaft Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler}, pages = {118 -- 145}, year = {2006}, language = {de} } @incollection{Timme2022, author = {Timme, Michael}, title = {Wettbewerbsregeln (\S\S 24-27)}, series = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum europ{\"a}ischen und deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht : Kartellrecht, Beihilfenrecht, Vergaberecht / hrsg von Franz J{\"u}rgen S{\"a}cker / Band 2: Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschr{\"a}nkungen (GWB), \S\S 1-96, 185, 186}, booktitle = {M{\"u}nchener Kommentar zum europ{\"a}ischen und deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht : Kartellrecht, Beihilfenrecht, Vergaberecht / hrsg von Franz J{\"u}rgen S{\"a}cker / Band 2: Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschr{\"a}nkungen (GWB), \S\S 1-96, 185, 186}, publisher = {Beck}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-406-75876-8}, pages = {589 -- 608}, year = {2022}, language = {de} } @article{EmhardtJarodzkaBrandGruweletal.2022, author = {Emhardt, Selina N. and Jarodzka, Halszka and Brand-Gruwel, Saskia and Drumm, Christian and Niehorster, Diederick C. and van Gog, Tamara}, title = {What is my teacher talking about? Effects of displaying the teacher's gaze and mouse cursor cues in video lectures on students' learning}, series = {Journal of Cognitive Psychology}, journal = {Journal of Cognitive Psychology}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {2044-5911}, doi = {10.1080/20445911.2022.2080831}, pages = {1 -- 19}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Eye movement modelling examples (EMME) are instructional videos that display a teacher's eye movements as "gaze cursor" (e.g. a moving dot) superimposed on the learning task. This study investigated if previous findings on the beneficial effects of EMME would extend to online lecture videos and compared the effects of displaying the teacher's gaze cursor with displaying the more traditional mouse cursor as a tool to guide learners' attention. Novices (N = 124) studied a pre-recorded video lecture on how to model business processes in a 2 (mouse cursor absent/present) × 2 (gaze cursor absent/present) between-subjects design. Unexpectedly, we did not find significant effects of the presence of gaze or mouse cursors on mental effort and learning. However, participants who watched videos with the gaze cursor found it easier to follow the teacher. Overall, participants responded positively to the gaze cursor, especially when the mouse cursor was not displayed in the video.}, language = {en} } @article{HerzwurmKramsPietschetal.2012, author = {Herzwurm, Georg and Krams, Benedikt and Pietsch, Wolfram and Schockert, Sixten}, title = {Report from the 3rd international workshop on requirements prioritization for customer oriented software development (RePriCo'12)}, series = {ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes}, volume = {37}, journal = {ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes}, number = {4}, publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery}, address = {New York}, issn = {0163-5948}, doi = {10.1145/2237796.2237817}, pages = {32 -- 34}, year = {2012}, abstract = {Prioritization is an essential task within requirements engineering to cope with complexity and to establish focus properly. The 3rd Workshop on Requirements Prioritization for customer oriented Software Development (RePriCo'12) focused on requirements prioritization and adjacent themes in the context of customer oriented development of bespoke and standard software. Five submissions have been accepted for the proceedings and for presentation. The report summarizes and points out key findings.}, language = {en} } @incollection{FreyerKempt2023, author = {Freyer, Nils and Kempt, Hendrik}, title = {AI-DSS in healthcare and their power over health-insecure collectives}, series = {Justice in global health}, booktitle = {Justice in global health}, editor = {Bhakuni, Himani and Miotto, Lucas}, publisher = {Routledge}, address = {London}, isbn = {9781003399933}, doi = {10.4324/9781003399933-4}, pages = {38 -- 55}, year = {2023}, abstract = {AI-based systems are nearing ubiquity not only in everyday low-stakes activities but also in medical procedures. To protect patients and physicians alike, explainability requirements have been proposed for the operation of AI-based decision support systems (AI-DSS), which adds hurdles to the productive use of AI in clinical contexts. This raises two questions: Who decides these requirements? And how should access to AI-DSS be provided to communities that reject these standards (particularly when such communities are expert-scarce)? This chapter investigates a dilemma that emerges from the implementation of global AI governance. While rejecting global AI governance limits the ability to help communities in need, global AI governance risks undermining and subjecting health-insecure communities to the force of the neo-colonial world order. For this, this chapter first surveys the current landscape of AI governance and introduces the approach of relational egalitarianism as key to (global health) justice. To discuss the two horns of the referred dilemma, the core power imbalances faced by health-insecure collectives (HICs) are examined. The chapter argues that only strong demands of a dual strategy towards health-secure collectives can both remedy the immediate needs of HICs and enable them to become healthcare independent.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{KohlFreyerKraemeretal.2023, author = {Kohl, Philipp and Freyer, Nils and Kr{\"a}mer, Yoka and Werth, Henri and Wolf, Steffen and Kraft, Bodo and Meinecke, Matthias and Z{\"u}ndorf, Albert}, title = {ALE: a simulation-based active learning evaluation framework for the parameter-driven comparison of query strategies for NLP}, series = {Deep Learning Theory and Applications}, booktitle = {Deep Learning Theory and Applications}, editor = {Conte, Donatello and Fred, Ana and Gusikhin, Oleg and Sansone, Carlo}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-39058-6 (Print)}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-39059-3_16}, pages = {235 -- 253}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Supervised machine learning and deep learning require a large amount of labeled data, which data scientists obtain in a manual, and time-consuming annotation process. To mitigate this challenge, Active Learning (AL) proposes promising data points to annotators they annotate next instead of a subsequent or random sample. This method is supposed to save annotation effort while maintaining model performance. However, practitioners face many AL strategies for different tasks and need an empirical basis to choose between them. Surveys categorize AL strategies into taxonomies without performance indications. Presentations of novel AL strategies compare the performance to a small subset of strategies. Our contribution addresses the empirical basis by introducing a reproducible active learning evaluation (ALE) framework for the comparative evaluation of AL strategies in NLP. The framework allows the implementation of AL strategies with low effort and a fair data-driven comparison through defining and tracking experiment parameters (e.g., initial dataset size, number of data points per query step, and the budget). ALE helps practitioners to make more informed decisions, and researchers can focus on developing new, effective AL strategies and deriving best practices for specific use cases. With best practices, practitioners can lower their annotation costs. We present a case study to illustrate how to use the framework.}, language = {en} } @article{KemptFreyerNagel2022, author = {Kempt, Hendrik and Freyer, Nils and Nagel, Saskia K.}, title = {Justice and the normative standards of explainability in healthcare}, series = {Philosophy \& Technology}, volume = {35}, journal = {Philosophy \& Technology}, number = {Article number: 100}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, address = {Berlin}, doi = {10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0}, pages = {1 -- 19}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability.}, language = {en} }