@incollection{Wilke2016, author = {Wilke, Thomas}, title = {Planning Process of the Di Castellamonte's Chapel of the Holy Shroud}, series = {Carlo e Amedeo di Castellamonte : 1571-1683, ingegneri e architetti per i duchi di Savoia}, booktitle = {Carlo e Amedeo di Castellamonte : 1571-1683, ingegneri e architetti per i duchi di Savoia}, editor = {Merlotti, Andrea}, publisher = {Campisano editore}, address = {Rom}, isbn = {978-88-98229-57-4}, pages = {141 -- 152}, year = {2016}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{Matcha2016, author = {Matcha, Heike}, title = {From Designing Buildings from Systems to Designing Systems for Buildings}, series = {Complexity \& Simplicity - Proceedings of the 34th eCAADe Conference - Volume 1}, booktitle = {Complexity \& Simplicity - Proceedings of the 34th eCAADe Conference - Volume 1}, editor = {Herneoja, Aulikki and {\"O}sterlund, Toni and Markkanen, Piia}, publisher = {ECAADe}, address = {Oulu, Finland}, doi = {10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.1.237}, pages = {237 -- 240}, year = {2016}, abstract = {We study the novel possibilities computer aided design and production open up for the design of building systems. Such systems today can, via individualized mass production, consist of a larger number and more complex parts than previously and therefore be assembled into more complex wholes. This opens up the possibility of designing specialized systems specifically for single buildings. The common order of starting with a building system and designing a building using this system can be reversed to designing a building first and then developing a system specifically for that building. We present and discuss research that incorporates students design projects into research work and fosters links between research and teaching.}, language = {en} } @book{Stapenhorst2016, author = {Stapenhorst, Carolin}, title = {Concept : a dialogic instrument in architectural design}, publisher = {Jovis}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-86859-364-8}, pages = {207 Seiten}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Concept - this is a key term in architectural discourse. However, all too often it is used imprecisely or merely for marketing purposes. What is a concept actually? This publication moves between design theory and design practice and follows the history of the definition of concept in architecture, leading to the formulation of a specifically instrumental and operative definition. It bases concept in architecture on its strategic potential in design decision-making processes. In the changing profession of the designing architect, decisions are increasingly made in multidisciplinary groups. Concept can serve as a dialogic instrument in the process, making it possible to process heterogeneous information from a range of spheres of knowledge. The effective presentation of selected information becomes a relevant interface in the design process, which has a significant influence on the quality of the design.}, language = {en} }