@inproceedings{YanStreseChwallek2018, author = {Yan, Zexiong and Strese, Steffen and Chwallek, Constanze}, title = {Explorer CEOs: The effect of CEO career variety on large firms' relative exploration orientation}, series = {G-Forum Jahreskonferenz 2018}, booktitle = {G-Forum Jahreskonferenz 2018}, pages = {42 Seiten}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Prior studies demonstrate that firms need to make smart trade-off decisions between exploration and exploitation activities in order to increase performance. Chief executive officers (CEOs) are principal decision makers of a firm's strategic posture. In this study, we theorize and empirically examine how relative exploration orientation of large publicly listed firms varies based on the career variety of their CEOs - that is, how diverse the professional experiences of executives were prior to them becoming CEOs. We further argue that the heterogeneity and structure of the top management team moderates the impact of CEO career variety on firms' relative exploration orientation. Based on multisource secondary data for 318 S\&P 500 firms from 2005 to 2015, we find that CEO career variety is positively associated with relative exploration orientation. Interestingly, CEOs with high career varieties appear to be less effective in pursuing exploration, when they work with highly heterogeneous and structurally interdependent top management teams.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{ChwallekMaassen2022, author = {Chwallek, Constanze and Maaßen, Franziska}, title = {Cure or blessing? The effect of (non-financial) signals on sustainable venture's funding success}, series = {G-Forum Jahreskonferenz 2022}, booktitle = {G-Forum Jahreskonferenz 2022}, pages = {7 Seiten}, year = {2022}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HunsdiekChwallek2019, author = {Hunsdiek, Niklas J.A. and Chwallek, Constanze}, title = {External venturing activities and the influence of the chief technology officer}, series = {G-Forum Jahreskonferenz 2019}, booktitle = {G-Forum Jahreskonferenz 2019}, pages = {6 Seiten}, year = {2019}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Stapenhorst2012, author = {Stapenhorst, Carolin}, title = {The concept as an operant instrument within the interdisciplinarity of the architectural design process}, publisher = {Politecnico di Torino}, address = {Turin}, pages = {242 Seiten}, year = {2012}, abstract = {In the introduction to their book "What is philosophy?" Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari deplore the inflationary and trivialised use of the term concept: "Finally, the most shameful moment came when computer science, marketing, design and advertising, all the disciplines of communication, seized hold of the word concept itself and said: 'This is our concern, we are the creative ones, we are the ideas men! We are the friends of the concept, we put in our computers.' " This doctoral thesis shares the concern of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, but still, it is a thesis in architecture and thus collocated within the field of the representatives of the "ideas men". It engages in architectural design theory, and refers in particular to the investigation of methodological approaches within the design process. Therefore, the thesis will not contribute to the philosophical dimension of the term, but intends to overcome its imprecise use within the architectural discourse, in compliance with Eug{\`e}ne Viollet-le-Duc's admonition relative to vague definitions: "Dans les arts, et dans l'architecture en particulier, les d{\´e}finitions vagues ont caus{\´e} bien des erreurs, ont laiss{\´e} germer bien des pr{\´e}jug{\´e}s, enraciner bien des id{\´e}es fausses. On met un mot en avant, chacun y attache un sens diff{\´e}rent." The term concept in architecture is very often used as pure marketing collateral, it serves to sell an idea, a product, a design. Its functional applicability is reduced to a special manner of illustration, produced as one of the various design presentation documents at the end of the design process. In contrast, the original contribution of this thesis aims to give a precise, instrumental dimension to the term concept: the concept is the expression of a specific logic, capable to guide the decisional sequences of the process and thus to improve the quality of the designed projects. The motivation to define a specific instrumentality of the concept is closely connected to the issue of interdisciplinarity in the architects' profession. The interdisciplinary character of the architectural field is widely accepted and discussed as such, but the thesis intends to give a more precise definition of the various kinds of competences involved by classifying them into either the internal or the external group. The traditional notion of interdisciplinarity, predominantly seen as collaboration between architects and technical experts, and, most notably, the historical, sometimes contentious, relationship between architects and engineers is described. Referring to recent developments, the transformation of the architect's role within the professional sphere, marked by an increasing importance of diverse influences and linked to a growing risk of marginalisation, is illustrated. The thesis describes different ways to adapt to this specific kind of interdisciplinarity, which generally requires the architect's ability to connect and to integrate various contents, different points of view and diverse scales. On the other hand, the big potential which is implicit in the interdisciplinary field is exposed: architects can inform their core competence, the design, by extracting contents of different disciplinary competences, pertaining or not pertaining to their own professional field. They have the possibility to cross fields of external competences in a selective way and by doing so they can build up a corpus of knowledge capable to generate and communicate guidelines and systematic methodologies for their design. At the end, the analysis of these two aspects allows the definition of a more specific professional profile of the architect as specialist of interdisciplinarity. The thesis is concerned with the theories around the design process. The design process is seen as open to inspection and critical evaluation, with major focus on the decisional sequences which characterise it. It concentrates on the process' descriptiveness and the degree of self-conscious approaches applied within it. The importance of regulative, strategic mechanisms is illustrated by testimonies taken from a series of design researches and leads to the functional definition of the figure of the concept as representation of a coherent set of ideas, as generator of a project-specific system of rules and as communicator of decisional strategies. The concept's function is furthermore defined as communicative interface which generates and transmits the system of rules authoritative for all the disciplinary competences involved in the design process, a communicative interface which constitutes a basis of shared convictions capable to increase the efficiency of collaboration. Furthermore, the concept's capacity to explore and elaborate the contents of external disciplines is identified as a possible methodological approach to innovative design thinking. The approach to a specific functional definition of the concept is continued by the description of a series of instruments that are simultaneously generating and communicating it. It is outlined to which degree the concept itself is already the result of an ideational process, collocated within the initial phase of the design proceedings, serving as a guideline to them, but still continuously evolving and adapting in its progression. In addition, it is illustrated how all the diverse instruments of the concept are operational media through which the knowledge transition between different disciplines can occur. The considerations about the concept as operational instrument of design are elaborated with regard to a number of examples of didactical applications that are particularly involved in the development and teaching of specific design methods. These examples illustrate the interrelations between design theory and design education. They are derived from very different schools of architecture and diverse mindsets, but all of them transmit models of conceptual design thinking.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MaurerMiskiwAcostaetal.2023, author = {Maurer, Florian and Miskiw, Kim K. and Acosta, Rebeca Ramirez and Harder, Nick and Sander, Volker and Lehnhoff, Sebastian}, title = {Market abstraction of energy markets and policies - application in an agent-based modeling toolbox}, series = {EI.A 2023: Energy Informatics}, booktitle = {EI.A 2023: Energy Informatics}, editor = {Jorgensen, Bo Norregaard and Pereira da Silva, Luiz Carlos and Ma, Zheng}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-031-48651-7 (Print)}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-031-48652-4_10}, pages = {139 -- 157}, year = {2023}, abstract = {In light of emerging challenges in energy systems, markets are prone to changing dynamics and market design. Simulation models are commonly used to understand the changing dynamics of future electricity markets. However, existing market models were often created with specific use cases in mind, which limits their flexibility and usability. This can impose challenges for using a single model to compare different market designs. This paper introduces a new method of defining market designs for energy market simulations. The proposed concept makes it easy to incorporate different market designs into electricity market models by using relevant parameters derived from analyzing existing simulation tools, morphological categorization and ontologies. These parameters are then used to derive a market abstraction and integrate it into an agent-based simulation framework, allowing for a unified analysis of diverse market designs. Furthermore, we showcase the usability of integrating new types of long-term contracts and over-the-counter trading. To validate this approach, two case studies are demonstrated: a pay-as-clear market and a pay-as-bid long-term market. These examples demonstrate the capabilities of the proposed framework.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{ReisgenSchleserScheiketal.2011, author = {Reisgen, Uwe and Schleser, Markus and Scheik, Sven and Michaeli, Walter and Gr{\"o}nlund, Oliver and Neuß, Andreas and Wunderle, Johannes and Poprawe, Reinhart and R{\"o}sner, A. and Bobzin, Kirsten and Schl{\"a}fer, Thomas and Theiß, Sebastian and Kutschmann, Pia and Haberstroh, Edmund and Flock, Dustin and B{\"u}hrig-Polaczek, Andreas and Jakob, M.}, title = {Novel process chains for the production of plastics/metal-hybrids}, series = {17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE 2011) : Aachen, Germany, 20 - 22 June 2011}, booktitle = {17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE 2011) : Aachen, Germany, 20 - 22 June 2011}, editor = {Thoben, Klaus-Dieter}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {Piscataway, NJ}, organization = {Forschungsinstitut f{\"u}r Rationalisierung ; International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising <17, 2011, Aachen>}, isbn = {978-1-457-70772-8 ; 978-3-943024-05-0}, pages = {596 -- 604}, year = {2011}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{NowackRoethBuehrigPolaczeketal.2008, author = {Nowack, N. and R{\"o}th, Thilo and B{\"u}hrig-Polaczek, Andreas and Klaus, G.}, title = {Advanced Sheet Metal Components Reinforced by Light Metal Cast Structures}, series = {Aluminium alloys : their physical and mechanical properties ; [proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, 22 - 26 Sept. 2008, Aachen, Germany ; ICAA 11]}, booktitle = {Aluminium alloys : their physical and mechanical properties ; [proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, 22 - 26 Sept. 2008, Aachen, Germany ; ICAA 11]}, number = {2}, editor = {Hirsch, J{\"u}rgen}, isbn = {978-3-527-32367-8}, pages = {2374 -- 2381}, year = {2008}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MaurerNitschKochemsetal.2024, author = {Maurer, Florian and Nitsch, Felix and Kochems, Johannes and Schimeczek, Christoph and Sander, Volker and Lehnhoff, Sebastian}, title = {Know your tools - a comparison of two open agent-based energy market models}, series = {2024 20th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)}, booktitle = {2024 20th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {New York, NY}, doi = {10.1109/EEM60825.2024.10609021}, pages = {8 Seiten}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Due to the transition to renewable energies, electricity markets need to be made fit for purpose. To enable the comparison of different energy market designs, modeling tools covering market actors and their heterogeneous behavior are needed. Agent-based models are ideally suited for this task. Such models can be used to simulate and analyze changes to market design or market mechanisms and their impact on market dynamics. In this paper, we conduct an evaluation and comparison of two actively developed open-source energy market simulation models. The two models, namely AMIRIS and ASSUME, are both designed to simulate future energy markets using an agent-based approach. The assessment encompasses modelling features and techniques, model performance, as well as a comparison of model results, which can serve as a blueprint for future comparative studies of simulation models. The main comparison dataset includes data of Germany in 2019 and simulates the Day-Ahead market and participating actors as individual agents. Both models are comparable close to the benchmark dataset with a MAE between 5.6 and 6.4 €/MWh while also modeling the actual dispatch realistically.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{MaurerSejdijaSander2024, author = {Maurer, Florian and Sejdija, Jonathan and Sander, Volker}, title = {Decentralized energy data storages through an Open Energy Database Server}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.10607895}, pages = {5 Seiten}, year = {2024}, abstract = {In the research domain of energy informatics, the importance of open datais rising rapidly. This can be seen as various new public datasets are created andpublished. Unfortunately, in many cases, the data is not available under a permissivelicense corresponding to the FAIR principles, often lacking accessibility or reusability.Furthermore, the source format often differs from the desired data format or does notmeet the demands to be queried in an efficient way. To solve this on a small scale atoolbox for ETL-processes is provided to create a local energy data server with openaccess data from different valuable sources in a structured format. So while the sourcesitself do not fully comply with the FAIR principles, the provided unique toolbox allows foran efficient processing of the data as if the FAIR principles would be met. The energydata server currently includes information of power systems, weather data, networkfrequency data, European energy and gas data for demand and generation and more.However, a solution to the core problem - missing alignment to the FAIR principles - isstill needed for the National Research Data Infrastructure.}, language = {en} } @misc{BiewendtBlaschkeBoehnert2019, author = {Biewendt, Marcel and Blaschke, Florian and B{\"o}hnert, Arno}, title = {The rebound effect: a critical and systematic review on the current state of affairs}, series = {Abstracts of the International Conference on Sustainable Economy and Agriculture}, journal = {Abstracts of the International Conference on Sustainable Economy and Agriculture}, editor = {Koponicsne Gy{\"o}rke, Diana}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Kaposv{\´a}r}, address = {Kaposv{\´a}r}, isbn = {978-615-5599-72-9}, pages = {101 -- 101}, year = {2019}, language = {en} }