@article{StaatHeitzerLangetal.2005, author = {Staat, Manfred and Heitzer, M. and Lang, H. and Wirtz, K.}, title = {Direct Finite Element Route for Design-by-Analysis of Pressure Components}, series = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 82 (2005), H. 1}, journal = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 82 (2005), H. 1}, isbn = {0308-0161}, pages = {61 -- 67}, year = {2005}, language = {en} } @article{Staat2005, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels}, series = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 82 (2005), H. 3}, journal = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 82 (2005), H. 3}, isbn = {0308-0161}, pages = {217 -- 225}, year = {2005}, language = {en} } @article{Staat2005, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels}, year = {2005}, abstract = {Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions.}, subject = {Finite-Elemente-Methode}, language = {en} } @article{Staat2005, author = {Staat, Manfred}, title = {Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components}, year = {2005}, abstract = {In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.}, subject = {Einspielen }, language = {en} }