TY - CHAP A1 - Pasligh, N. A1 - Funke, D. A1 - Röth, Thilo A1 - Krack, R. T1 - Leichtbau Quertrager als Stahlblech-Aluminiumdruckguss-Hybrid - Von der numerischen Berechnung bis zum realen Prototypen T2 - VDI BERICHTE Y1 - 2010 SN - 978-3-18-092107-5 N1 - 15. Kongress SIMVEC Berechnung und Simulation im Fahrzeugbau, Baden-Baden, 16. und 17. November 2010 PB - VDI Verlag CY - Düsseldorf ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Börner, Sebastian A1 - Funke, Harald A1 - Hendrick, P. A1 - Recker, E. T1 - LES of Jets In Cross-Flow and Application to the “Micromix” Hydrogen Combustion T2 - XIX International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines 2009 (ISABE 2009) : Proceedings of a meeting held 7-11 September 2009, Montreal, Canada Y1 - 2009 SN - 9781615676064 SP - 1555 EP - 1561 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Funke, Harald A1 - Börner, Sebastian A1 - Keinz, Jan A1 - Hendrick, P. A1 - Recker, E. T1 - Low NOx Hydrogen combustion chamber for industrial gas turbine applications“, 14th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery T2 - ISROMAC-14 : the Forteenth International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery ; Honolulu, Hawaii, February 27 - March 02nd, 2012 Y1 - 2012 N1 - International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery ; (14 ; 2012.02.27-03.02 ; Honolulu, Hawaii) ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dachwald, Bernd T1 - Low-Thrust Mission Analysis and Global Trajectory Optimization Using Evolutionary Neurocontrol: New Results T2 - European Workshop on Space Mission Analysis ESA/ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany 10 { 12 Dec 2007 N2 - Interplanetary trajectories for low-thrust spacecraft are often characterized by multiple revolutions around the sun. Unfortunately, the convergence of traditional trajectory optimizers that are based on numerical optimal control methods depends strongly on an adequate initial guess for the control function (if a direct method is used) or for the starting values of the adjoint vector (if an indirect method is used). Especially when many revolutions around the sun are re- quired, trajectory optimization becomes a very difficult and time-consuming task that involves a lot of experience and expert knowledge in astrodynamics and optimal control theory, because an adequate initial guess is extremely hard to find. Evolutionary neurocontrol (ENC) was proposed as a smart method for low-thrust trajectory optimization that fuses artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms to so-called evolutionary neurocontrollers (ENCs) [1]. Inspired by natural archetypes, ENC attacks the trajectoryoptimization problem from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning, a perspective that is quite different from that of optimal control theory. Within the context of ENC, a trajectory is regarded as the result of a spacecraft steering strategy that maps permanently the actual spacecraft state and the actual target state onto the actual spacecraft control vector. This way, the problem of searching the optimal spacecraft trajectory is equivalent to the problem of searching (or "learning") the optimal spacecraft steering strategy. An artificial neural network is used to implement such a spacecraft steering strategy. It can be regarded as a parameterized function (the network function) that is defined by the internal network parameters. Therefore, each distinct set of network parameters defines a different network function and thus a different steering strategy. The problem of searching the optimal steering strategy is now equivalent to the problem of searching the optimal set of network parameters. Evolutionary algorithms that work on a population of (artificial) chromosomes are used to find the optimal network parameters, because the parameters can be easily mapped onto a chromosome. The trajectory optimization problem is solved when the optimal chromosome is found. A comparison of solar sail trajectories that have been published by others [2, 3, 4, 5] with ENC-trajectories has shown that ENCs can be successfully applied for near-globally optimal spacecraft control [1, 6] and that they are able to find trajectories that are closer to the (unknown) global optimum, because they explore the trajectory search space more exhaustively than a human expert can do. The obtained trajectories are fairly accurate with respect to the terminal constraint. If a more accurate trajectory is required, the ENC-solution can be used as an initial guess for a local trajectory optimization method. Using ENC, low-thrust trajectories can be optimized without an initial guess and without expert attendance. Here, new results for nuclear electric spacecraft and for solar sail spacecraft are presented and it will be shown that ENCs find very good trajectories even for very difficult problems. Trajectory optimization results are presented for 1. NASA's Solar Polar Imager Mission, a mission to attain a highly inclined close solar orbit with a solar sail [7] 2. a mission to de ect asteroid Apophis with a solar sail from a retrograde orbit with a very-high velocity impact [8, 9] 3. JPL's \2nd Global Trajectory Optimization Competition", a grand tour to visit four asteroids from different classes with a NEP spacecraft Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Hailer, Benjamin A1 - Weber, Tobias A1 - Arent, Jan-Christoph T1 - Manufacturing Process Simulation for Autoclave-Produced Sandwich Structures T2 - Proceedings of SAMPE Europe Conference 2019, Nantes, France Y1 - 2019 SP - 1 EP - 8 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tobias A1 - Englhard, Markus A1 - Hailer, Benjamin A1 - Arent, Jan-Christoph T1 - Manufacturing Process Simulation for the Prediction of Tool-Part-Interaction and Ply Wrinkling T2 - Proceedings of SAMPE Europe Conference 2019, Nantes, France Y1 - 2019 SP - 1 EP - 10 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tobias A1 - Englhard, Markus A1 - Hailer, Benjamin A1 - Arent, Jan-Christoph T1 - Manufacturing Process Simulation for the Prediction of Tool-Part-Interaction and Ply Wrinkling T2 - Proceedings of SAMPE Europe Conference, Amiens , France Y1 - 2015 SP - 1 EP - 10 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Weber, Tobias T1 - Manufacturing Process Simulation for Tooling Optimization: Reduction of Quality Issues During Autoclave Manufacturing of Composite Parts T2 - Proceedings of SAMPE Europe Conference 2015, Amiens, France Y1 - 2015 SP - 1 EP - 8 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Finger, Felix A1 - Götten, Falk A1 - Braun, Carsten A1 - Bil, Cees T1 - Mass, Primary Energy, and Cost - The Impact of Optimization Objectives on the Initial Sizing of Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft T2 - Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2019, DLRK 2019. Darmstadt, Germany Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.25967/490012 SP - 1 EP - 17 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Wurm, P. T1 - Mission analysis for an advanced solar photon thruster T2 - 60th International Astronautical Congress 2009, IAC 2009 N2 - The so-called "compound solar sail", also known as "Solar Photon Thruster" (SPT), is a solar sail design concept, for which the two basic functions of the solar sail, namely light collection and thrust direction, are uncoupled. In this paper, we introduce a novel SPT concept, termed the Advanced Solar Photon Thruster (ASPT). This model does not suffer from the simplified assumptions that have been made for the analysis of compound solar sails in previous studies. We present the equations that describe the force, which acts on the ASPT. After a detailed design analysis, the performance of the ASPT with respect to the conventional flat solar sail (FSS) is investigated for three interplanetary mission scenarios: An Earth-Venus rendezvous, where the solar sail has to spiral towards the Sun, an Earth-Mars rendezvous, where the solar sail has to spiral away from the Sun, and an Earth-NEA rendezvous (to near-Earth asteroid 1996FG3), where a large orbital eccentricity change is required. The investigated solar sails have realistic near-term characteristic accelerations between 0.1 and 0.2mm/s2. Our results show that a SPT is not superior to the flat solar sail unless very idealistic assumptions are made. KW - Interplanetary flight Y1 - 2009 SN - 978-161567908-9 N1 - 60th International Astronautical Congress 2009, IAC 2009; Daejeon; South Korea; 12 October 2009 through 16 October 2009 VL - 8 SP - 6838 EP - 6851 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER -