TY  - JOUR
A1  - Staat, Manfred
A1  - Heitzer, M.
A1  - Lang, H.
A1  - Wirtz, K.
T1  - Direct Finite Element Route for Design-by-Analysis of Pressure Components
JF  - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 82 (2005), H. 1
Y1  - 2005
SN  - 0308-0161
SP  - 61
EP  - 67
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Staat, Manfred
T1  - Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels
JF  - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 82 (2005), H. 3
Y1  - 2005
SN  - 0308-0161
SP  - 217
EP  - 225
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Staat, Manfred
T1  - Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels
N2  - Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions.
KW  - Finite-Elemente-Methode
KW  - Grenzwertberechnung
KW  - Axialbelastung
KW  - FEM
KW  - Grenzwertberechnung
KW  - Axialbelastung
KW  - Traglastanalyse
KW  - Limit analysis
KW  - Global and local collapse
KW  - Axially cracked pipe
KW  - Pressure loaded crack-face
Y1  - 2005
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Staat, Manfred
T1  - Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components
N2  - In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.
KW  - Einspielen <Werkstoff>
KW  - Plastizität
KW  - Deformation
KW  - Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis
KW  - Einspiel-Analyse
KW  - fortschreitende plastische Deformation
KW  - alternierend Verformbarkeit
KW  - Einspiel-Kriterium
KW  - Design-by-analysis
KW  - Shakedown analysis
KW  - Progressive plastic deformation
KW  - Alternating plasticity
KW  - Shakedown criterion
Y1  - 2005
ER  -