TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Direct finite element route for design-by-analysis of pressure components N2 - In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion. KW - Einspielen KW - Plastizität KW - Deformation KW - Analytischer Zulaessigkeitsnachweis KW - Einspiel-Analyse KW - fortschreitende plastische Deformation KW - alternierend Verformbarkeit KW - Einspiel-Kriterium KW - Design-by-analysis KW - Shakedown analysis KW - Progressive plastic deformation KW - Alternating plasticity KW - Shakedown criterion Y1 - 2005 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads N2 - Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model. KW - Biomedizinische Technik KW - Einspielen KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Bruchmechanik KW - shakedown KW - material shakedown KW - linear kinematic hardening KW - nonlinear kinematic hardening KW - ratchetting Y1 - 2002 ER -