TY - JOUR A1 - Bohndick, Carla A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Jänsch, Vanessa K. A1 - Barnat, Miriam T1 - How different diversity factors affect the perception of first-year requirements in higher education JF - Frontline Learning Research N2 - In the light of growing university entry rates, higher education institutions not only serve larger numbers of students, but also seek to meet first-year students’ ever more diverse needs. Yet to inform universities how to support the transition to higher education, research only offers limited insights. Current studies tend to either focus on the individual factors that affect student success or they highlight students’ social background and their educational biography in order to examine the achievement of selected, non-traditional groups of students. Both lines of research appear to lack integration and often fail to take organisational diversity into account, such as different types of higher education institutions or degree programmes. For a more comprehensive understanding of student diversity, the present study includes individual, social and organisational factors. To gain insights into their role for the transition to higher education, we examine how the different factors affect the students’ perception of the formal and informal requirements of the first year as more or less difficult to cope with. As the perceived requirements result from both the characteristics of the students and the institutional context, they allow to investigate transition at the interface of the micro and the meso level of higher education. Latent profile analyses revealed that there are no profiles with complex patterns of perception of the first-year requirements, but the identified groups rather differ in the overall level of perceived challenges. Moreover, SEM indicates that the differences in the perception largely depend on the individual factors self-efficacy and volition. Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.14786/flr.v9i2.667 SN - 2295-3159 VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 78 EP - 95 PB - EARLI ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Buchholtz, Nils A1 - Barnat, Miriam A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Heemsoth, Tim A1 - Vorhölter, Katrin A1 - Wibowo, Jonas T1 - Praxistransfer in der tertiären Bildungsforschung: Modelle, Gelingensbedingungen und Nachhaltigkeit Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-3-943423-72-3 PB - Hamburg University Press CY - Hamburg ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - De Clercq, Mikael A1 - Barnat, Miriam T1 - The Role of Diversity for the Transition to Higher Education T2 - EARLI SIG 4, Giessen Y1 - 2018 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Barnat, Miriam ED - Jenert, Tobias ED - Reinmann, Gabi ED - Schmohl, Tobias T1 - Kombination quantitativer und qualitativer Methoden zur Untersuchung der Studieneingangsphase T2 - Hochschulbildungsforschung. Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanstöße für die Hochschuldidaktik Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-3-658-20308-5 SP - 169 EP - 184 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Barnat, Miriam T1 - Kombination qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden zur Untersuchung der Studieneinstiegsphase T2 - Hochschulbildungsforschung : Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanstöße für die Hochschuldidaktik N2 - Mit Hilfe der Kombination von qualitativen und quantitativen Verfahren zielen Mixed-Methods Ansätze darauf ab, einen vertieften Einblick in komplexe Gegenstände zu gewinnen. In der Hochschulbildungsforschung finden sie zunehmend Anklang, da sie besonders geeignet erscheinen, das vielschichtige Wirkungsgefüge zu erfassen, das das Lehren und Lernen an Hochschulen auszeichnet. Der Beitrag geht den Potenzialen von Mixed-Methods Ansätzen am Beispiel einer Studie zur Studieneingangsphase nach, die den Wirkungszusammenhang zwischen der Nutzung von Angeboten für den Studieneinstieg und der Entwicklung von Studierfähigkeit untersucht. Der Beitrag veranschaulicht die Integration von Methoden und Ergebnissen, um Chancen und Grenzen von Mixed-Methods Studien für die Hochschulbildungsforschung zu diskutieren. KW - Mixed-Methods KW - Wirkungsforschung KW - Hochschule KW - Studieneingangsphase KW - Studierfähigkeit Y1 - 2019 SN - 978-3-658-20309-2 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20309-2_10 SP - 169 EP - 184 PB - Springer VS CY - Wiesbaden ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Barnat, Miriam A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Mergner, Julia A1 - Jänsch, Vanessa T1 - Entwicklung studienrelevanter Kompetenzen im Zusammenspiel mit Studieneinstiegsangeboten T2 - KoBF-Auswertungsworkshop 31.05.-01.06.2017 Y1 - 2017 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Barnat, Miriam A1 - Bosse, Elke T1 - The challenge of creating meta-inferences: Combining data representing institutional and individual perspectives on first-year support in higher education T2 - 9th Conference on Social Science Methodology of the International Sociological Association, Leicester, UK Y1 - 2016 N1 - RC33 Conference 2016 SP - 1 EP - 20 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Barnat, Miriam A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Tight, Malcolm T1 - The Guiding Role of Theory in Mixed-Methods Research: Combining Individual and Institutional Perspectives on the Transition to Higher Education T2 - Theory and Method in Higher Education Research. Vol 3 N2 - The methodological discourse of mixed-methods research offers general procedures to combine quantitative and qualitative methods for investigating complex fields of research such as higher education. However, integrating different methods still poses considerable challenges. To move beyond general recommendations for mixed-methods research, this chapter proposes to discuss methodological issues with respect to a particular research domain. Taking current studies on the transition to higher education as an example, the authors first provide an overview of the potentials and limitations of quantitative and qualitative methods in the research domain. Second, they show the need for a conceptual framework grounded in the theory of the research object to guide the integration of different methods and findings. Finally, an example study that investigates transition with regard to the interplay of the individual student and the institutional context serves to illustrate the guiding role of theory. The framework integrates different theoretical perspectives on transition, informs the selection of the research methods, and defines the nexus of the two strands that constitute the mixed-methods design. As the interplay of individual and context is of concern for teaching and learning in general, the example presented may be fruitful for the wider field of higher education research. KW - Quantitative research KW - Mixed-Methods Research KW - Transition KW - Students KW - Higher education Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-1-78743-222-2 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220170000003001 SP - 1 EP - 19 PB - Emerald Publishing Limited ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Barnat, Miriam A1 - Bosse, Elke A1 - Mergner, Julia T1 - Forschungsbasierte Qualitätsentwicklung für die Studieneingangsphase JF - Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung (ZFHE) Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-12-03/05 SN - 2219-6994 VL - 12 IS - 3 SP - 71 EP - 91 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Barnat, Miriam A1 - Faria, Joana Abelha A1 - Bosse, Elke T1 - Heterogenität und Studierfähigkeit: Erste Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittbefragung JF - Qualität in der Wissenschaft: QiW ; Zeitschrift für Qualitätsentwicklung in Forschung, Studium und Administration Y1 - 2017 SN - 1860-3041 N1 - gedruckt in der Bereichsbibliothek Eupener Str. vorhanden VL - 11 IS - 1 SP - 17 EP - 24 PB - UVW Universitäts-Verlag Webler CY - Bielefeld ER -