TY  - JOUR
A1  - Vögele, Stefan
A1  - Josyabhatla, Vishnu Teja
A1  - Ball, Christopher
A1  - Rhoden, Imke
A1  - Grajewski, Matthias
A1  - Rübbelke, Dirk
A1  - Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
T1  - Robust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders' perspectives
JF  - Energy
N2  - Using scenarios is vital in identifying and specifying measures for successfully transforming the energy system. Such transformations can be particularly challenging and require the support of a broader set of stakeholders. Otherwise, there will be opposition in the form of reluctance to adopt the necessary technologies. Usually, processes for considering stakeholders' perspectives are very time-consuming and costly. In particular, there are uncertainties about how to deal with modifications in the scenarios. In principle, new consulting processes will be required. In our study, we show how multi-criteria decision analysis can be used to analyze stakeholders' attitudes toward transition paths. Since stakeholders differ regarding their preferences and time horizons, we employ a multi-criteria decision analysis approach to identify which stakeholders will support or oppose a transition path. We provide a flexible template for analyzing stakeholder preferences toward transition paths. This flexibility comes from the fact that our multi-criteria decision aid-based approach does not involve intensive empirical work with stakeholders. Instead, it involves subjecting assumptions to robustness analysis, which can help identify options to influence stakeholders' attitudes toward transitions.
Y1  - 2023
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128326
SN  - 1873-6785 (Online)
SN  - 0360-5442 (Print)
IS  - In Press, Article 128326
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Amsterdam
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Rübbelke, Dirk
A1  - Vögele, Stefan
A1  - Grajewski, Matthias
A1  - Zobel, Luzy
T1  - Cross border adjustment mechanism: Initial data for the assessment of hydrogen-based steel production
JF  - Data in Brief
N2  - Ambitious climate targets affect the competitiveness of industries in the international market. To prevent such industries from moving to other countries in the wake of increased climate protection efforts, cost adjustments may become necessary. Their design requires knowledge of country-specific production costs. Here, we present country-specific cost figures for different production routes of steel, paying particular attention to transportation costs. The data can be used in floor price models aiming to assess the competitiveness of different steel production routes in different countries (Rübbelke, 2022).
KW  - Energy-intensive industry
KW  - Steel industry
KW  - Competitiveness
KW  - Floor prices
KW  - Cross border adjustment mechanism
Y1  - 2023
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108907
SN  - 2352-3409
VL  - 47
IS  - Article 108907
SP  - 1
EP  - 5
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Amsterdam
ER  -