TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels N2 - Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions. KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Grenzwertberechnung KW - Axialbelastung KW - FEM KW - Grenzwertberechnung KW - Axialbelastung KW - Traglastanalyse KW - Limit analysis KW - Global and local collapse KW - Axially cracked pipe KW - Pressure loaded crack-face Y1 - 2005 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Plastic collapse analysis of longitudinally flawed pipes and vessels N2 - Improved collapse loads of thick-walled, crack containing pipes and vessels are suggested. Very deep cracks have a residual strength which is better modelled by a global limit load. In all burst tests, the ductility of pressure vessel steels was sufficiently high whereby the burst pressure could be predicted by limit analysis with no need to apply fracture mechanics. The relative prognosis error increases however, for long and deep defects due to uncertainties of geometry and strength data. KW - Druckbehälter KW - Stahl KW - Druckbelastung KW - Druckbeanspruchung KW - Rohr KW - Rohrbruch KW - Druckbehälter KW - Stahl KW - Druckbelastung KW - Druckbeanspruchung KW - Rohrbruch KW - Fehlerstellen KW - pipes KW - vessels KW - load limit KW - burst tests KW - burst pressure KW - flaw Y1 - 2004 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads N2 - Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model. KW - Biomedizinische Technik KW - Einspielen KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Bruchmechanik KW - shakedown KW - material shakedown KW - linear kinematic hardening KW - nonlinear kinematic hardening KW - ratchetting Y1 - 2002 ER -