TY  - JOUR
A1  - Umutlu, Lale
A1  - Kraff, Oliver
A1  - Fischer, Anja
A1  - Kinner, Sonja
A1  - Maderwald, Stefan
A1  - Nassenstein, Kai
A1  - Nensa, Felix
A1  - Grüneisen, Johannes
A1  - Orzada, Stephan
A1  - Bitz, Andreas
A1  - Forsting, Michael
A1  - Ladd, Mark E.
A1  - Lauenstein, Thomas C.
T1  - Seven-Tesla MRI of the female pelvis
JF  - European Radiology
Y1  - 2013
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2868-0
SN  - 1432-1084
VL  - 23
IS  - 9
SP  - 2364
EP  - 2373
PB  - Springer
CY  - Berlin
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Umutlu, Lale
A1  - Bitz, Andreas
A1  - Maderwald, Stefan
A1  - Orzada, Stephan
A1  - Kinner, Sonja
A1  - Kraff, Oliver
A1  - Brote, Irina
A1  - Ladd, Susanne C.
A1  - Schroeder, Tobias
A1  - Forsting, Michael
T1  - Contrast-enhanced ultra-high-field liver MRI: a feasibility trial
JF  - European Journal of Radiology
Y1  - 2013
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.004
SN  - 0720-048X
VL  - 82
IS  - 5
SP  - 760
EP  - 767
PB  - Elsevier
CY  - Amsterdam
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Schlamann, Marc
A1  - Voigt, Melanie A.
A1  - Maderwald, Stefan
A1  - Bitz, Andreas
A1  - Kraff, Oliver
A1  - Ladd, Susanne C.
A1  - Ladd, Mark E.
A1  - Forsting, Michael
A1  - Wilhelm, Hans
T1  - Exposure to high-field MRI does not affect cognitive function
JF  - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
N2  - Purpose
To assess potential cognitive deficits under the influence of static magnetic fields at various field strengths some studies already exist. These studies were not focused on attention as the most vulnerable cognitive function. Additionally, mostly no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were performed.

Materials and Methods
In all, 25 right-handed men were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent one MRI examination of 63 minutes at 1.5 T and one at 7 T within an interval of 10 to 30 days. The order of the examinations was randomized. Subjects were referred to six standardized neuropsychological tests strictly focused on attention immediately before and after each MRI examination. Differences in neuropsychological variables between the timepoints before and after each MRI examination were assessed and P-values were calculated

Results
Only six subtests revealed significant differences between pre- and post-MRI. In these tests the subjects achieved better results in post-MRI testing than in pre-MRI testing (P = 0.013–0.032). The other tests revealed no significant results.

Conclusion
The improvement in post-MRI testing is only explicable as a result of learning effects. MRI examinations, even in ultrahigh-field scanners, do not seem to have any persisting influence on the attention networks of human cognition immediately after exposure.
Y1  - 2010
U6  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22065
SN  - 1522-2586
VL  - 31
IS  - 5
SP  - 1061
EP  - 1066
PB  - Wiley-Liss
CY  - New York
ER  -