TY - CHAP A1 - Wolff, Nino A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Bauer, Wolfgang A1 - Fiebig, Christopher A1 - Gerding, Patrick A1 - Parow-Souchon, Kai A1 - Pongs, Anna A1 - Reiffenrath, Matti A1 - Ziemann, Thomas T1 - Alternative application of solar sail technology T2 - Advances in solar sailing N2 - The development of Gossamer sail structures for solar sails contributes to a large field of future space applications like thin film solar generators, membrane antennas and drag sails. The focus of this paper is the development of a drag sail based on solar sail technology that could contribute to a reduction of space debris in low Earth orbits. The drag sail design and its connections to solar sail development, a first test on a sounding rocket, as well as the ongoing integration of the drag sail into a triple CubeSat is presented. Y1 - 2014 SN - 978-3-642-34906-5 (Print) ; 978-3-642-34907-2 (E-Book) U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34907-2_23 SP - 351 EP - 365 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Spietz, Peter A1 - Spröwitz, Tom A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Grundmann, Jan Thimo A1 - Jahnke, Rico A1 - Mikschl, Tobias A1 - Mikulz, Eugen A1 - Montenegro, Sergio A1 - Reershemius, Siebo A1 - Renger, Thomas A1 - Ruffer, Michael A1 - Sasaki, Kaname A1 - Sznajder, Maciej A1 - Tóth, Norbert A1 - Ceriotti, Matteo A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Macdonald, Malcolm A1 - McInnes, Colin A1 - Seboldt, Wolfgang A1 - Quantius, Dominik A1 - Bauer, Waldemar A1 - Wiedemann, Carsten A1 - Grimm, Christian D. A1 - Hercik, David A1 - Ho, Tra-Mi A1 - Lange, Caroline A1 - Schmitz, Nicole T1 - Paths not taken – The Gossamer roadmap’s other options JF - Advances in Space Research KW - Solar sail KW - Small spacecraft KW - DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER roadmap for solar sailing KW - GOSSAMER-1 Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.044 SN - 0273-1177 VL - 67 IS - 9 SP - 2912 EP - 2956 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Dachwald, Bernd T1 - Temperature increase on folded solar sail membranes JF - Advances in Space Research Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.026 SN - 0273-1177 VL - 67 IS - 9 SP - 2688 EP - 2695 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Bauer, Waldemar A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Grundmann, Jan Thimo A1 - Straubel, Marco A1 - Sznajder, Maciej A1 - Tóth, Norbert A1 - Zander, Martin E. T1 - Large lightweight deployable structures for planetary defence: solar sail propulsion, solar concentrator payloads, large-scale photovoltaic power T2 - 4th IAA Planetary Defense Conference - PDC 2015, 13-17 April 2015, Frascati, Roma, Italy Y1 - 2015 N1 - IAA-PDC-15-P-20 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Pirovano, Laura A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Noomen, Ron T1 - Attitude and Orbital Dynamics Modeling for an Uncontrolled Solar-Sail Experiment in Low-Earth Orbit T2 - 25th International Symposium on Spaceflight Dynamics, 2015, Munich, Germany Y1 - 2015 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Pirovano, Laura A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Noomen, Ron T1 - Attitude and orbital modeling of an uncontrolled solar-sail experiment in low-Earth orbit T2 - 25th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics ISSFD N2 - Gossamer-1 is the first project of the three-step Gossamer roadmap, the purpose of which is to develop, prove and demonstrate that solar-sail technology is a safe and reliable propulsion technique for long-lasting and high-energy missions. This paper firstly presents the structural analysis performed on the sail to understand its elastic behavior. The results are then used in attitude and orbital simulations. The model considers the main forces and torques that a satellite experiences in low-Earth orbit coupled with the sail deformation. Doing the simulations for varying initial conditions in attitude and rotation rate, the results show initial states to avoid and maximum rotation rates reached for correct and faulty deployment of the sail. Lastly comparisons with the classic flat sail model are carried out to test the hypothesis that the elastic behavior does play a role in the attitude and orbital behavior of the sail KW - Solar sail KW - Gossamer structures KW - Attitude dynamics KW - Orbital dynamics Y1 - 2015 N1 - 25th International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics ISSFD October 19 – 23, 2015, Munich, Germany https://issfd.org/2015/ SP - 1 EP - 15 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grundmann, Jan Thimo A1 - Meß, Jan-Gerd A1 - Biele, Jens A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Spietz, Peter A1 - Grimm, Christian D. A1 - Spröwitz, Tom A1 - Lange, Caroline A1 - Ulamec, Stephan T1 - Small spacecraft in small solar system body applications T2 - IEEE Aerospace Conference 2017, Big Sky, Montana, USA Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-1-5090-1613-6 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2017.7943626 SP - 1 EP - 20 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grundmann, Jan Thimo A1 - Borella, Laura A1 - Ceriotti, Matteo A1 - Chand, Suditi A1 - Cordero, Federico A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Fexer, Sebastian A1 - Grimm, Christian D. A1 - Hendrikse, Jeffrey A1 - Herčík, David A1 - Herique, Alain A1 - Hillebrandt, Martin A1 - Ho, Tra-Mi A1 - Kesseler, Lars A1 - Laabs, Martin A1 - Lange, Caroline A1 - Lange, Michael A1 - Lichtenheldt, Roy A1 - McInnes, Colin R. A1 - Moore, Iain A1 - Peloni, Alessandro A1 - Plettenmeier, Dirk A1 - Quantius, Dominik A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Venditti, Flaviane c. F. A1 - Vergaaij, Merel A1 - Viavattene, Giulia A1 - Virkki, Anne K. A1 - Zander, Martin T1 - More bucks for the bang: new space solutions, impact tourism and one unique science & engineering opportunity at T-6 months and counting T2 - 7th IAA Planetary Defense Conference N2 - For now, the Planetary Defense Conference Exercise 2021's incoming fictitious(!), asteroid, 2021 PDC, seems headed for impact on October 20th, 2021, exactly 6 months after its discovery. Today (April 26th, 2021), the impact probability is 5%, in a steep rise from 1 in 2500 upon discovery six days ago. We all know how these things end. Or do we? Unless somebody kicked off another headline-grabbing media scare or wants to keep civil defense very idle very soon, chances are that it will hit (note: this is an exercise!). Taking stock, it is barely 6 months to impact, a steadily rising likelihood that it will actually happen, and a huge uncertainty of possible impact energies: First estimates range from 1.2 MtTNT to 13 GtTNT, and this is not even the worst-worst case: a 700 m diameter massive NiFe asteroid (covered by a thin veneer of Ryugu-black rubble to match size and brightness), would come in at 70 GtTNT. In down to Earth terms, this could be all between smashing fireworks over some remote area of the globe and a 7.5 km crater downtown somewhere. Considering the deliberate and sedate ways of development of interplanetary missions it seems we can only stand and stare until we know well enough where to tell people to pack up all that can be moved at all and save themselves. But then, it could just as well be a smaller bright rock. The best estimate is 120 m diameter from optical observation alone, by 13% standard albedo. NASA's upcoming DART mission to binary asteroid (65803) Didymos is designed to hit such a small target, its moonlet Dimorphos. The Deep Impact mission's impactor in 2005 successfully guided itself to the brightest spot on comet 9P/Tempel 1, a relatively small feature on the 6 km nucleus. And 'space' has changed: By the end of this decade, one satellite communication network plans to have launched over 11000 satellites at a pace of 60 per launch every other week. This level of series production is comparable in numbers to the most prolific commercial airliners. Launch vehicle production has not simply increased correspondingly – they can be reused, although in a trade for performance. Optical and radio astronomy as well as planetary radar have made great strides in the past decade, and so has the design and production capability for everyday 'high-tech' products. 60 years ago, spaceflight was invented from scratch within two years, and there are recent examples of fast-paced space projects as well as a drive towards 'responsive space'. It seems it is not quite yet time to abandon all hope. We present what could be done and what is too close to call once thinking is shoved out of the box by a clear and present danger, to show where a little more preparedness or routine would come in handy – or become decisive. And if we fail, let's stand and stare safely and well instrumented anywhere on Earth together in the greatest adventure of science. Y1 - 2021 N1 - 7th IAA Planetary Defense Conference, Vienna, Austria, 26-30 April 2021 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grundmann, Jan Thimo A1 - Biele, Jens A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Grimm, Christian D. A1 - Lange, Caroline A1 - Ulamec, Stephan A1 - Ziach, Christian A1 - Spröwitz, Tom A1 - Ruffer, Michael A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Spietz, Peter A1 - Toth, Norbert A1 - Mimasu, Yuya A1 - Rittweger, Andreas A1 - Bibring, Jean-Pierre A1 - Braukhane, Andy A1 - Boden, Ralf Christian A1 - Dumont, Etienne A1 - Jahnke, Stephan Siegfried A1 - Jetzschmann, Michael A1 - Krüger, Hans A1 - Lange, Michael A1 - Gomez, Antonio Martelo A1 - Massonett, Didier A1 - Okada, Tatsuaki A1 - Sagliano, Marco A1 - Sasaki, Kaname A1 - Schröder, Silvio A1 - Sippel, Martin A1 - Skoczylas, Thomas A1 - Wejmo, Elisabet T1 - Small landers and separable sub-spacecraft for near-term solar sails T2 - The Fourth International Symposium on Solar Sailing 2017 N2 - Following the successful PHILAE landing with ESA's ROSETTA probe and the launch of the MINERVA rovers and the Mobile Asteroid Surface Scout, MASCOT, aboard the JAXA space probe, HAYABUSA2, to asteroid (162173) Ryugu, small landers have found increasing interest. Integrated at the instrument level in their mothership they support small solar system body studies. With efficient capabilities, resource-friendly design and inherent robustness they are an attractive exploration mission element. We discuss advantages and constraints of small sub-spacecraft, focusing on emerging areas of activity such as asteroid diversity studies, planetary defence, and asteroid mining, on the background of our projects PHILAE, MASCOT, MASCOT2, the JAXA-DLR Solar Power Sail Lander Design Study, and others. The GOSSAMER-1 solar sail deployment concept also involves independent separable sub-spacecraft operating synchronized to deploy the sail. Small spacecraft require big changes in the way we do things and occasionally a little more effort than would be anticipated based on a traditional large spacecraft approach. In a Constraints-Driven Engineering environment we apply Concurrent Design and Engineering (CD/CE), Concurrent Assembly, Integration and Verification (CAIV) and Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). Near-term solar sails will likely be small spacecraft which we expect to harmonize well with nano-scale separable instrument payload packages. KW - Small Solar System Body Lander KW - Small Spacecraft KW - PHILAE KW - MASCOT KW - Solar Power Sail Y1 - 2017 N1 - The Fourth International Symposium on Solar Sailing 2017, 17-20 January 2017. Kyoto Research Park, Kyoto, Japan SP - 1 EP - 10 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grundmann, Jan Thimo A1 - Bauer, Wlademar A1 - Borchers, Kai A1 - Dumont, Etienne A1 - Grimm, Christian D. A1 - Ho, Tra-Mi A1 - Jahnke, Rico A1 - Koch, Aaron D. A1 - Lange, Caroline A1 - Maiwald, Volker A1 - Meß, Jan-Gerd A1 - Mikulz, Eugen A1 - Quantius, Dominik A1 - Reershemius, Siebo A1 - Renger, Thomas A1 - Sasaki, Kaname A1 - Seefeldt, Patric A1 - Spietz, Peter A1 - Spröwitz, Tom A1 - Sznajder, Maciej A1 - Toth, Norbert A1 - Ceriotti, Matteo A1 - McInnes, Colin A1 - Peloni, Alessandro A1 - Biele, Jens A1 - Krause, Christian A1 - Dachwald, Bernd A1 - Hercik, David A1 - Lichtenheldt, Roy A1 - Wolff, Friederike A1 - Koncz, Alexander A1 - Pelivan, Ivanka A1 - Schmitz, Nicole A1 - Boden, Ralf A1 - Riemann, Johannes A1 - Seboldt, Wolfgang A1 - Wejmo, Elisabet A1 - Ziach, Christian A1 - Mikschl, Tobias A1 - Montenegro, Sergio A1 - Ruffer, Michael A1 - Cordero, Federico A1 - Tardivel, Simon T1 - Solar sails for planetary defense & high-energy missions T2 - IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings N2 - 20 years after the successful ground deployment test of a (20 m) 2 solar sail at DLR Cologne, and in the light of the upcoming U.S. NEAscout mission, we provide an overview of the progress made since in our mission and hardware design studies as well as the hardware built in the course of our solar sail technology development. We outline the most likely and most efficient routes to develop solar sails for useful missions in science and applications, based on our developed `now-term' and near-term hardware as well as the many practical and managerial lessons learned from the DLR-ESTEC Gossamer Roadmap. Mission types directly applicable to planetary defense include single and Multiple NEA Rendezvous ((M)NR) for precursor, monitoring and follow-up scenarios as well as sail-propelled head-on retrograde kinetic impactors (RKI) for mitigation. Other mission types such as the Displaced L1 (DL1) space weather advance warning and monitoring or Solar Polar Orbiter (SPO) types demonstrate the capability of near-term solar sails to achieve asteroid rendezvous in any kind of orbit, from Earth-coorbital to extremely inclined and even retrograde orbits. Some of these mission types such as SPO, (M)NR and RKI include separable payloads. For one-way access to the asteroid surface, nanolanders like MASCOT are an ideal match for solar sails in micro-spacecraft format, i.e. in launch configurations compatible with ESPA and ASAP secondary payload platforms. Larger landers similar to the JAXA-DLR study of a Jupiter Trojan asteroid lander for the OKEANOS mission can shuttle from the sail to the asteroids visited and enable multiple NEA sample-return missions. The high impact velocities and re-try capability achieved by the RKI mission type on a final orbit identical to the target asteroid's but retrograde to its motion enables small spacecraft size impactors to carry sufficient kinetic energy for deflection. Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2019.8741900 N1 - AERO 2019; Big Sky; United States; 2 March 2019 through 9 March 2019 SP - 1 EP - 21 ER -