TY - CHAP A1 - Timme, Michael T1 - Wettbewerbsregeln (§§ 24-27) T2 - Münchener Kommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Wettbewerbsrecht : Kartellrecht, Beihilfenrecht, Vergaberecht / hrsg von Franz Jürgen Säcker / Band 2: Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (GWB), §§ 1-96, 185, 186 Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-406-75876-8 SP - 589 EP - 608 PB - Beck CY - München ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Emhardt, Selina N. A1 - Jarodzka, Halszka A1 - Brand-Gruwel, Saskia A1 - Drumm, Christian A1 - Niehorster, Diederick C. A1 - van Gog, Tamara T1 - What is my teacher talking about? Effects of displaying the teacher’s gaze and mouse cursor cues in video lectures on students’ learning JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology N2 - Eye movement modelling examples (EMME) are instructional videos that display a teacher’s eye movements as “gaze cursor” (e.g. a moving dot) superimposed on the learning task. This study investigated if previous findings on the beneficial effects of EMME would extend to online lecture videos and compared the effects of displaying the teacher’s gaze cursor with displaying the more traditional mouse cursor as a tool to guide learners’ attention. Novices (N = 124) studied a pre-recorded video lecture on how to model business processes in a 2 (mouse cursor absent/present) × 2 (gaze cursor absent/present) between-subjects design. Unexpectedly, we did not find significant effects of the presence of gaze or mouse cursors on mental effort and learning. However, participants who watched videos with the gaze cursor found it easier to follow the teacher. Overall, participants responded positively to the gaze cursor, especially when the mouse cursor was not displayed in the video. KW - Instructional design KW - eye movement modelling examples KW - video learning Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2080831 SN - 2044-5911 SP - 1 EP - 19 PB - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group CY - Abingdon ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Timme, Michael T1 - Beweislast beim gutgläubigen Erwerb eines Kraftfahrzeugs ohne Erhalt der Zulassungsbescheinigung Teil II — Zugleich eine Besprechung von BGH, Urt. v. 23.9.2022 – V ZR 148/21, MDR 2022, 1542 JF - Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht N2 - Im Handel mit Kraftfahrzeugen gehören Aspekte des gutgläubigen Erwerbs zu den beinahe alltäglichen Standardproblemen. Der BGH fügt in seiner Entscheidung v. 23.9.2022–VZR148/21, MDR 2022, 1541 diesem im Detail breit gefächerten Themenfeld einen weiteren Mosaikstein hinzu: Der Erwerber erhielt das verkaufte Kfz ohne Übergabe einer Zulassungsbescheinigung Teil II, behauptet aber, diese Bescheinigung sei dem vom ihm eingeschalteten Vermittler bei Erwerb (als Fälschung) vorgelegt worden. Tatsächlich befand sich das Original durchgängig beim wahren Eigentümer, der nunmehr Herausgabe des Fahrzeugs verlangt. Der BGH schützt in dieser Gestaltung im Ergebnis den Erwerber. Die Entscheidung ist in mehrfacher Hinsicht bemerkenswert. Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/doi.org/10.9785/mdtr-2023-770102 SN - 0340-1812 VL - 77 IS - 1 SP - r5 EP - r7 PB - Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt CY - Köln ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kempt, Hendrik A1 - Freyer, Nils A1 - Nagel, Saskia K. T1 - Justice and the normative standards of explainability in healthcare JF - Philosophy & Technology N2 - Providing healthcare services frequently involves cognitively demanding tasks, including diagnoses and analyses as well as complex decisions about treatments and therapy. From a global perspective, ethically significant inequalities exist between regions where the expert knowledge required for these tasks is scarce or abundant. One possible strategy to diminish such inequalities and increase healthcare opportunities in expert-scarce settings is to provide healthcare solutions involving digital technologies that do not necessarily require the presence of a human expert, e.g., in the form of artificial intelligent decision-support systems (AI-DSS). Such algorithmic decision-making, however, is mostly developed in resource- and expert-abundant settings to support healthcare experts in their work. As a practical consequence, the normative standards and requirements for such algorithmic decision-making in healthcare require the technology to be at least as explainable as the decisions made by the experts themselves. The goal of providing healthcare in settings where resources and expertise are scarce might come with a normative pull to lower the normative standards of using digital technologies in order to provide at least some healthcare in the first place. We scrutinize this tendency to lower standards in particular settings from a normative perspective, distinguish between different types of absolute and relative, local and global standards of explainability, and conclude by defending an ambitious and practicable standard of local relative explainability. KW - Clinical decision support systems KW - Justice KW - Medical AI KW - Explainability KW - Normative standards Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00598-0 VL - 35 IS - Article number: 100 SP - 1 EP - 19 PB - Springer Nature CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Golland, Alexander ED - Riechert, Anne ED - Wilmer, Thomas T1 - Kommentierung von § 7 Telekommunikation-Telemedien-Datenschutzgesetz T2 - TTDSG Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-503-20978-1 N1 - Gedruckte Ausgabe unter 21 QRUG 2 verfügbar. SP - 145 EP - 151 PB - Erich Schmidt CY - Berlin ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Golland, Alexander ED - Riechert, Anne ED - Wilmer, Thomas T1 - Kommentierung von § 26 Telekommunikation-Telemedien-Datenschutzgesetz T2 - TTDSG Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-503-20978-1 N1 - Gedruckte Ausgabe unter 21 QRUG 2 verfügbar. SP - 439 EP - 474 PB - Erich Schmidt CY - Berlin ER -