TY - JOUR A1 - Blanke, Tobias A1 - Hagenkamp, Markus A1 - Döring, Bernd A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Reger, Vitali A1 - Kuhnhenne, Markus T1 - Net-exergetic, hydraulic and thermal optimization of coaxial heat exchangers using fixed flow conditions instead of fixed flow rates JF - Geothermal Energy N2 - Previous studies optimized the dimensions of coaxial heat exchangers using constant mass fow rates as a boundary condition. They show a thermal optimal circular ring width of nearly zero. Hydraulically optimal is an inner to outer pipe radius ratio of 0.65 for turbulent and 0.68 for laminar fow types. In contrast, in this study, fow conditions in the circular ring are kept constant (a set of fxed Reynolds numbers) during optimization. This approach ensures fxed fow conditions and prevents inappropriately high or low mass fow rates. The optimization is carried out for three objectives: Maximum energy gain, minimum hydraulic efort and eventually optimum net-exergy balance. The optimization changes the inner pipe radius and mass fow rate but not the Reynolds number of the circular ring. The thermal calculations base on Hellström’s borehole resistance and the hydraulic optimization on individually calculated linear loss of head coefcients. Increasing the inner pipe radius results in decreased hydraulic losses in the inner pipe but increased losses in the circular ring. The net-exergy diference is a key performance indicator and combines thermal and hydraulic calculations. It is the difference between thermal exergy fux and hydraulic efort. The Reynolds number in the circular ring is instead of the mass fow rate constant during all optimizations. The result from a thermal perspective is an optimal width of the circular ring of nearly zero. The hydraulically optimal inner pipe radius is 54% of the outer pipe radius for laminar fow and 60% for turbulent fow scenarios. Net-exergetic optimization shows a predominant infuence of hydraulic losses, especially for small temperature gains. The exact result depends on the earth’s thermal properties and the fow type. Conclusively, coaxial geothermal probes’ design should focus on the hydraulic optimum and take the thermal optimum as a secondary criterion due to the dominating hydraulics. Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40517-021-00201-3 SN - 2195-9706 N1 - Corresponding author: Tobias Blanke VL - 9 IS - Article number: 19 PB - Springer CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Blanke, Tobias A1 - Reger, Vitali A1 - Döring, Bernd A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Kuhnhenne, Markus T1 - Koaxiale Stahlenergiepfähle JF - Stahlbau N2 - Ein entscheidender Teil der Energiewende ist die Wärmewende im Gebäudesektor. Ein Schlüsselelement sind hier Wärmepumpen. Diese benötigen eine Wärmequelle, der sie Energie entziehen können, um sie auf ein höheres Temperaturniveau zu transformieren. Diese Wärmequelle kann bspw. das Erdreich sein, dessen Wärme durch Erdsonden erschlossen werden kann. In diesem Beitrag werden in Stahlpfähle integrierte Koaxialsonden mit dem Stand der Technik von Erdsonden gleichen Durchmessers bezüglich ihrer thermischen Leistungsmerkmale verglichen. Die Stahlenergiepfähle bieten neben der Wärmegewinnung weitere Vorteile, da sie auch eine statische Funktion übernehmen und rückstandsfrei zurückgebaut werden können. Es werden analytische und numerische Berechnungen vorgestellt, um die thermischen Potenziale beider Systeme zu vergleichen. Außerdem wird ein Testaufbau gezeigt, bei dem Stahlenergiepfähle in zwei verschiedenen Längen mit vorhandenen gängigen Erdsonden verglichen werden können. Die Berechnungen zeigen einen deutlichen thermischen Mehrertrag zwischen 26 % und 148 % der Stahlenergiepfähle gegenüber dem Stand der Technik abhängig vom Erdreich. Die Messergebnisse zeigen einen thermischen Mehrertrag von über 100 %. Es lässt sich also signifikante Erdsondenlänge einsparen. Dabei ist zu beachten, dass sich damit der thermisch genutzte Bereich des Erdreichs reduziert, wodurch die thermische Regeneration und/oder das Langzeitverhalten des Erdreichs an Bedeutung gewinnt. Y1 - 2021 VL - 90. 2021 IS - 6 SP - 417 EP - 424 PB - Wiley CY - Weinheim ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sattler, Johannes, Christoph A1 - Röger, Marc A1 - Schwarzbözl, Peter A1 - Buck, Reiner A1 - Macke, Ansgar A1 - Raeder, Christian A1 - Göttsche, Joachim T1 - Review of heliostat calibration and tracking control methods JF - Solar Energy N2 - Large scale central receiver systems typically deploy between thousands to more than a hundred thousand heliostats. During solar operation, each heliostat is aligned individually in such a way that the overall surface normal bisects the angle between the sun’s position and the aim point coordinate on the receiver. Due to various tracking error sources, achieving accurate alignment ≤1 mrad for all the heliostats with respect to the aim points on the receiver without a calibration system can be regarded as unrealistic. Therefore, a calibration system is necessary not only to improve the aiming accuracy for achieving desired flux distributions but also to reduce or eliminate spillage. An overview of current larger-scale central receiver systems (CRS), tracking error sources and the basic requirements of an ideal calibration system is presented. Leading up to the main topic, a description of general and specific terms on the topics heliostat calibration and tracking control clarifies the terminology used in this work. Various figures illustrate the signal flows along various typical components as well as the corresponding monitoring or measuring devices that indicate or measure along the signal (or effect) chain. The numerous calibration systems are described in detail and classified in groups. Two tables allow the juxtaposition of the calibration methods for a better comparison. In an assessment, the advantages and disadvantages of individual calibration methods are presented. Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.06.030 VL - 207 SP - 110 EP - 132 PB - Elsevier CY - Amsterdam ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reger, Vitali A1 - Kuhnhenne, Markus A1 - Hachul, Helmut A1 - Döring, Bernd A1 - Blanke, Tobias A1 - Göttsche, Joachim T1 - Plusenergiegebäude 2.0 in Stahlleichtbauweise JF - Stahlbau Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stab.201900034 SN - 1437-1049 (E-journal), 0038-9145 (print) VL - 88 IS - 6 SP - 522 EP - 528 PB - Ernst & Sohn CY - Berlin ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Alexopoulos, Spiros A1 - Dümmler, Andreas A1 - Maddineni, S. K. T1 - Multi-Mirror Array Calculations With Optical Error N2 - The optical performance of a 2-axis solar concentrator was simulated with the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The concentrator consists of a mirror array, which was created using the application builder. The mirror facets are preconfigured to form a focal point. During tracking all mirrors are moved simultaneously in a coupled mode by 2 motors in two axes, in order to keep the system in focus with the moving sun. Optical errors on each reflecting surface were implemented in combination with the solar angular cone of ± 4.65 mrad. As a result, the intercept factor of solar radiation that is available to the receiver was calculated as a function of the transversal and longitudinal angles of incidence. In addition, the intensity distribution on the receiver plane was calculated as a function of the incidence angles. KW - solar process heat KW - concentrating collector KW - raytracing KW - point-focussing system Y1 - 2019 SP - 1 EP - 6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Warerkar, Shashikant A1 - Schmitz, Stefan A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Hoffschmidt, Bernhard A1 - Reißel, Martin A1 - Tamme, Rainer T1 - Air-Sand Heat Exchanger for High-Temperature Storage JF - Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 133 (2011), H. 2 Y1 - 2011 SN - 0199-6231 N1 - 7 pages SP - 021010 PB - ASME CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Geimer, Konstantin A1 - Sauerborn, Markus A1 - Hoffschmidt, Bernhard A1 - Schmitz, Mark A1 - Göttsche, Joachim T1 - Test Facility for Absorber Specimens of Solar Tower Power Plants JF - Advances in Science and Technology. 74 (2010) Y1 - 2010 N1 - 5th Forum on New Materials : CIMTEC 2010, Montecatini Terme, Italy 13-18 June 2010. Part C SP - 266 EP - 271 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Hoffschmidt, Bernhard A1 - Schmitz, Stefan A1 - Sauerborn, Markus T1 - Solar Concentrating Systems Using Small Mirror Arrays JF - Journal of solar energy engineering Y1 - 2010 SN - 0199-6231 VL - Vol. 132 IS - Iss. 1 SP - 4 S. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Hoffschmidt, Bernhard A1 - Schmitz, Stefan A1 - Sauerborn, Markus T1 - Solar Concentrating Systems Using Small Mirror Arrays / Göttsche, Joachim ; Hoffschmidt, Bernhard ; Schmitz, Stefan ; Sauerborn, Markus ; Buck, Reiner ; Teufel, Edgar ; Badstübner, Karin ; Ifland, David ; Rebholz, Christian JF - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy Sustainability - 2008 : : presented ... August 10 - 14, 2008, Jacksonville, Florida, USA / sponsored by Advanced Energy Systems Division, ASME; Solar Energy Division, ASME Y1 - 2009 SN - 9780791843208 N1 - International Conference on Energy Sustainability ; (2 : ; 2008.08.10-14 : ; Jacksonville, Fla.) ; ES ; (2 : ; 2008.08.10-14 : ; Jacksonville, Fla.) SP - 1 EP - 5 PB - ASME CY - New York, NY ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Göttsche, Joachim A1 - Schwarzer, Klemens A1 - Röther, S. A1 - Jellinghaus, Sabine T1 - Efficient daylighting, heating and shading with rooflight heliostats JF - Conference Internationale Energie Solaire et Batiment Y1 - 2009 SP - 243 EP - 248 PB - EPFL CY - Lausanne ER -