TY - BOOK A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - Numerical methods for limit and shakedown analysis. Deterministic and probabilistic problems. Y1 - 2003 SN - 3-00-010001-6 N1 - NIC Series Vol. 15 / Ed. by Staat, M; Heitzer, M. PB - John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC) CY - Jülich ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Some Achievements of the European Project LISA for FEM Based Limit and Shakedown Analysis JF - Computational mechanics : developments and applications, 2002 : presented at the 2002 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 5 - 9. / Badie, N. [ed] Y1 - 2002 SN - 0791846520 N1 - Serie PVP ; vol. 441. SP - 177 EP - 185 PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers CY - New York ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, M. T1 - Limit and Shakedown Analysis with Uncertain Data JF - Stochastic optimization techniques : numerical methods and technical applications / Marti, K. [ed] Y1 - 2002 SN - 3-540-42889-5 SP - 241 EP - 254 PB - Springer CY - Heidelberg ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - The restricted influence of kinematic hardening on shakedown loads N2 - Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model. KW - Biomedizinische Technik KW - Einspielen KW - Shakedown KW - Ratcheting KW - Bruchmechanik KW - shakedown KW - material shakedown KW - linear kinematic hardening KW - nonlinear kinematic hardening KW - ratchetting Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Rezension zu: K. Zimmermann, Technische Mechanik – multimedial. Fachbuch Verlag Leipzig (2000) JF - Technische Mechanik Y1 - 2002 SN - 0232-3869 VL - 22 IS - 1 SP - 76 EP - 77 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Szelinski, E. A1 - Heitzer, Michael T1 - Kollapsanalyse von längsfehlerbehafteten Rohren und Behältern T1 - Collapse analysis of longitudinally flawed pipes and vessels N2 - Es werden verbesserte Kollapsanalysen von dickwandigen, mit axialen Oberflächenfehlern behafteten Rohren und Behältern vorgeschlagen. KW - Druckbehälter KW - Stahl KW - Druckbelastung KW - Druckbeanspruchung KW - Rohr KW - Rohrbruch KW - Fehlerstellen KW - pipes KW - vessels KW - load limit KW - burst tests KW - burst pressure KW - flaw Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Staat, Manfred A1 - Heitzer, Michael A1 - Reinders, H. A1 - Schubert, F. T1 - Einspielen und Ratchetting bei Zug- und Torsionsbelastung: Analyse und Experimente T1 - Shakedown and ratchetting under tension-torsion loadings: analysis and experiments N2 - Traglast- und Einspielanalysen sind vereinfachte doch exakte Verfahren der klassischen Plastizitätstheorie, die neben ausreichender Verformbarkeit keine einschränkenden Voraussetzungen beinhalten. Die Vereinfachungen betreffen die Beschaffung der Daten und Modelle für Details der Lastgeschichte und des Stoffverhaltens. Eine FEM-basierte Traglast- und Einspielanalyse für ideal plastisches Material wurde auf ein kinematisch verfestigendes Materialgesetz erweitert und in das Finite Element Programm PERMAS implementiert. In einem einfachen Zug-Torsionsexperiment wurde eine Hohlprobe mit konstanter Torsion und zyklischer Zugbelastung beansprucht, um die neue Implementierung zu verifizieren. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Einspielanalyse gut mit den experimentellen Ergebnissen übereinstimmt. Bei Verfestigung lassen sich wesentlich größere Sicherheiten nachweisen. Dieses Potential bedarf weiterer experimenteller Absicherung. Parallel dazu ist die Eisnpieltheorie auf fortschrittliche Verfestigungsansätze zu erweitern. KW - Zug-Druck-Beanspruchung KW - Einspielen KW - Ratcheting KW - Torsion KW - Zug-Druck-Belastung KW - Torsionsbelastung KW - shakedown KW - ratchetting KW - tension–torsion loading Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Cyclic plastic deformation tests to verify FEM-based shakedown analyses N2 - Fatigue analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying that thermal ratcheting is limited. To this end it is important to make a clear distintion between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range (continuing deformation). As part of an EU-supported research project, experiments were carried out using a 4-bar model. The experiment comprised a water-cooled internal tube, and three insulated heatable outer test bars. The system was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with alternating temperatures at the outer bars. The test parameters were partly selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses. During the test, temperatures and strains were measured as a function of time. The loads and the resulting stresses were confirmed on an ongoing basis during performance of the test, and after it. Different material models were applied for this incremental elasto-plastic analysis using the ANSYS program. The results of the simulation are used to verify the FEM-based shakedown analysis. KW - Materialermüdung KW - Einspielen KW - Materialermüdung KW - shakedown analyses KW - thermal ratcheting KW - fatigue analyses Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - LISA - a European project for FEM-based limit and shakedown analysis N2 - The load-carrying capacity or the safety against plastic limit states are the central questions in the design of structures and passive components in the apparatus engineering. A precise answer is most simply given by limit and shakedown analysis. These methods can be based on static and kinematic theorems for lower and upper bound analysis. Both may be formulated as optimization problems for finite element discretizations of structures. The problems of large-scale analysis and the extension towards realistic material modelling will be solved in a European research project. Limit and shakedown analyses are briefly demonstrated with illustrative examples. KW - Einspielen KW - Traglast KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Traglastanalyse KW - Einspielanalyse KW - FEM KW - limit analysis KW - shakedown analysis Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Heitzer, M. A1 - Staat, Manfred T1 - Direct FEM approach to design-by-analysis of pressurized components N2 - Abstracts of the ACHEMA 2000 - International Meeting on Chemical Engineering, Environmental Protection and Biotechnology, May 22 - 27, 2000. Frankfurt am Main. Achema 2000 : special edition / Linde. [Ed.: Linde AG. Red.: Volker R. Leski]. - Wiesbaden : Linde AG, 2000. - 56 p. : Ill., . - pp: 79 - 81 N2 - Abstracts der ACHEMA 2000 - International Meeting on Chemical Engineering, Environmental Protection and Biotechnology, May 22 - 27, 2000. Frankfurt am Main. KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - Finite-Elemente-Methode KW - limit analysis KW - shakedown analysis Y1 - 2000 ER -