TY  - CHAP
A1  - Bosse, Elke
A1  - Barnat, Miriam
T1  - Kombination qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden zur Untersuchung der Studieneinstiegsphase
T2  - Hochschulbildungsforschung : Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanstöße für die Hochschuldidaktik
N2  - Mit Hilfe der Kombination von qualitativen und quantitativen Verfahren zielen Mixed-Methods Ansätze darauf ab, einen vertieften Einblick in komplexe Gegenstände zu gewinnen. In der Hochschulbildungsforschung finden sie zunehmend Anklang, da sie besonders geeignet erscheinen, das vielschichtige Wirkungsgefüge zu erfassen, das das Lehren und Lernen an Hochschulen auszeichnet. Der Beitrag geht den Potenzialen von Mixed-Methods Ansätzen am Beispiel einer Studie zur Studieneingangsphase nach, die den Wirkungszusammenhang zwischen der Nutzung von Angeboten für den Studieneinstieg und der Entwicklung von Studierfähigkeit untersucht. Der Beitrag veranschaulicht die Integration von Methoden und Ergebnissen, um Chancen und Grenzen von Mixed-Methods Studien für die Hochschulbildungsforschung zu diskutieren.
KW  - Mixed-Methods
KW  - Wirkungsforschung
KW  - Hochschule
KW  - Studieneingangsphase
KW  - Studierfähigkeit
Y1  - 2019
SN  - 978-3-658-20309-2
U6  - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20309-2_10
SP  - 169
EP  - 184
PB  - Springer VS
CY  - Wiesbaden
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Gazda, Quentin
A1  - Maurischat, Andreas
T1  - Special functions and Gauss-Thakur sums in higher rank and dimension
Y1  - 2020
PB  - De Gruyter
CY  - Berlin
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Maurischat, Andreas
T1  - Algebraic independence of the Carlitz period and its hyperderivatives
KW  - Drinfeld modules
KW  - t-modules
KW  - Transcendence
KW  - Hyperdifferentials
Y1  - 2021
N1  - Zweitveröffentlichung.
Verlagsveröffentlichung: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2022.01.006
SP  - 1
EP  - 12
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Bohndick, Carla
A1  - Bosse, Elke
A1  - Jänsch, Vanessa K.
A1  - Barnat, Miriam
T1  - How different diversity factors affect the perception of first-year requirements in higher education
JF  - Frontline Learning Research
N2  - In the light of growing university entry rates, higher education institutions not only serve larger numbers of students, but also seek to meet first-year students’ ever more diverse needs. Yet to inform universities how to support the transition to higher education, research only offers limited insights. Current studies tend to either focus on the individual factors that affect student success or they highlight students’ social background and their educational biography in order to examine the achievement of selected, non-traditional groups of students. Both lines of research appear to lack integration and often fail to take organisational diversity into account, such as different types of higher education institutions or degree programmes. For a more comprehensive understanding of student diversity, the present study includes individual, social and organisational factors. To gain insights into their role for the transition to higher education, we examine how the different factors affect the students’ perception of the formal and informal requirements of the first year as more or less difficult to cope with. As the perceived requirements result from both the characteristics of the students and the institutional context, they allow to investigate transition at the interface of the micro and the meso level of higher education. Latent profile analyses revealed that there are no profiles with complex patterns of perception of the first-year requirements, but the identified groups rather differ in the overall level of perceived challenges. Moreover, SEM indicates that the differences in the perception largely depend on the individual factors self-efficacy and volition.
Y1  - 2021
U6  - https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v9i2.667
SN  - 2295-3159
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
SP  - 78
EP  - 95
PB  - EARLI
ER  -