The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 62 of 79
Back to Result List

Therefore Fermat is right

  • It was Fernat's idea to investigate how many numbers would fulfill the equation according to the Pythagorean Theorem if the exponent were increased to random, e.g. to a3 + b3 = c3. His question became therefore: are there two whole numbers the cubes of which add up to the volume of the cube of a third whole number? He posed this same question, of course, for all kinds of higher exponents, so that the equation could be generalized: is there an integral solution for the equation an + bn = cn, if the exponent n is higher than 2? Although in 1993, the English mathematician Andrew Wiles was able to produce an arithmetical proof for Fermat's famous theorem, I will show that there is a simple logical explanation which is also pragmatic and plausible and what is the result of a fundamental alternative idea how our world seems to be constructed.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Walter van Laack
ISSN:2329-079X (E-Journal); 2329-0781 (Print)
Parent Title (English):American journal of humanities and social sciences : AJHSS
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2014
Date of the Publication (Server):2014/05/12
Volume:2
Issue:2
First Page:117
Last Page:120
Link:https://worldscholars.org/index.php/ajhss/article/view/512
Zugriffsart:weltweit
Institutes:FH Aachen / Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik