Experimental validation of an enhanced system synthesis approach

  • Planning the layout and operation of a technical system is a common task for an engineer. Typically, the workflow is divided into consecutive stages: First, the engineer designs the layout of the system, with the help of his experience or of heuristic methods. Secondly, he finds a control strategy which is often optimized by simulation. This usually results in a good operating of an unquestioned sys- tem topology. In contrast, we apply Operations Research (OR) methods to find a cost-optimal solution for both stages simultaneously via mixed integer program- ming (MILP). Technical Operations Research (TOR) allows one to find a provable global optimal solution within the model formulation. However, the modeling error due to the abstraction of physical reality remains unknown. We address this ubiq- uitous problem of OR methods by comparing our computational results with mea- surements in a test rig. For a practical test case we compute a topology and control strategy via MILP and verify that the objectives are met up to a deviation of 8.7%.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in X Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Lena Altherr, Thorsten Ederer, Ulf Lorenz, Peter F. Pelz, Philipp Pöttgen
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28697-6_1
ISBN:978-3-319-28695-2
Parent Title (English):Operations Research Proceedings 2014
Publisher:Springer
Place of publication:Basel
Editor:Marco Lübbecke, Arie Koster, Peter Letmathe, Reihard Madlener, Britta Peis, Grit Walther
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of Completion:2014
Length:6
Link:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28697-6_1
Zugriffsart:campus
Institutes:FH Aachen / Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik
collections:Verlag / Springer