Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (317) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (175)
- Conference Proceeding (67)
- Book (37)
- Part of a Book (20)
- Patent (7)
- Report (4)
- Other (2)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Talk (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (317) (remove)
Keywords
- Geschichte (2)
- avalanche (2)
- Cardiovascular MRI (1)
- Commercial Vehicle (1)
- Common Rail Injection System (1)
- Diesel Engine (1)
- European Transient Cycle (1)
- Illustration (1)
- Left ventriular function (1)
- MR-stethoscope (1)
- Magnetic field strength (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1)
- Process virtualization (1)
- Product bundling (1)
- RAMMS (1)
- Selective Catalytic Reduction (1)
- Services (1)
- Telecommunication (1)
- Transformation (1)
- Typographie (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (68)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (41)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (36)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (34)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (31)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (31)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (26)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (24)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (23)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (23)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (13)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (5)
- Sonstiges (5)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (4)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (2)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (1)
Purpose
To assess potential cognitive deficits under the influence of static magnetic fields at various field strengths some studies already exist. These studies were not focused on attention as the most vulnerable cognitive function. Additionally, mostly no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were performed.
Materials and Methods
In all, 25 right-handed men were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent one MRI examination of 63 minutes at 1.5 T and one at 7 T within an interval of 10 to 30 days. The order of the examinations was randomized. Subjects were referred to six standardized neuropsychological tests strictly focused on attention immediately before and after each MRI examination. Differences in neuropsychological variables between the timepoints before and after each MRI examination were assessed and P-values were calculated
Results
Only six subtests revealed significant differences between pre- and post-MRI. In these tests the subjects achieved better results in post-MRI testing than in pre-MRI testing (P = 0.013–0.032). The other tests revealed no significant results.
Conclusion
The improvement in post-MRI testing is only explicable as a result of learning effects. MRI examinations, even in ultrahigh-field scanners, do not seem to have any persisting influence on the attention networks of human cognition immediately after exposure.