Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (255) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (124)
- Conference Proceeding (77)
- Part of a Book (30)
- Book (12)
- Working Paper (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (2)
- Patent (2)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Datenschutz (2)
- Digitale Transformation (2)
- Energy efficiency (2)
- Engineering optimization (2)
- Literaturanalyse (2)
- MINLP (2)
- Pump System (2)
- Serious Game (2)
- Water (2)
- Agility (1)
- Antarctica (1)
- Awareness (1)
- Bahadur efficiency (1)
- Bioethanol (1)
- Biorefinery (1)
- Bladder (1)
- Booster Stations (1)
- Buffering Capacity (1)
- CDG (1)
- Chance Constraint (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (67)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (44)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (41)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (25)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (24)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (24)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (22)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (21)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (18)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (16)
- Fachbereich Architektur (8)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (6)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (5)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (4)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (3)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (2)
- Nowum-Energy (2)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (2)
- FH Aachen (1)
Prosthetic textile implants of different shapes, sizes and polymers are used to correct the apical prolapse after hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The selection of the implant before or during minimally invasive surgery depends on the patient’s anatomical defect, intended function after reconstruction and most importantly the surgeon’s preference. Weakness or damage of the supporting tissues during childbirth, menopause or previous pelvic surgeries may put females in higher risk of prolapse. Numerical simulations of reconstructed pelvic floor with weakened tissues and organ supported by textile product models: DynaMesh®-PRS soft, DynaMesh®-PRP soft and DynaMesh®-CESA from FEG Textiletechnik mbH, Germany are compared.