Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (1620) (remove)
Language
- English (1146)
- German (472)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Spanish (1)
Keywords
- Biosensor (25)
- Blitzschutz (15)
- CAD (11)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (11)
- civil engineering (11)
- Bauingenieurwesen (10)
- Lightning protection (9)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (6)
- Telekommunikationsmarkt (6)
- shakedown analysis (6)
- Enterprise Architecture (5)
- Gamification (5)
- Graduiertentagung (5)
- Leadership (5)
- Clusterion (4)
- Energy storage (4)
- Führung (4)
- Kanalisation (4)
- Limit analysis (4)
- Natural language processing (4)
Institute
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (296)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (259)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (239)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (207)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (203)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (167)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (151)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (137)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (68)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (57)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (52)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (48)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (34)
- Nowum-Energy (22)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (16)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (10)
- FH Aachen (7)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (4)
- IaAM - Institut für angewandte Automation und Mechatronik (3)
In this work, three patent pending calibration methods for heliostat fields of central receiver systems (CRS) developed by the Solar-Institut Jülich (SIJ) of the FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences are presented. The calibration methods can either operate in a combined mode or in stand-alone mode. The first calibration method, method A, foresees that a camera matrix is placed into the receiver plane where it is subjected to concentrated solar irradiance during a measurement process. The second calibration method, method B, uses an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) such as a quadrocopter to automatically fly into the reflected solar irradiance cross-section of one or more heliostats (two variants of method B were tested). The third calibration method, method C, foresees a stereo central camera or multiple stereo cameras installed e.g. on the solar tower whereby the orientations of the heliostats are calculated from the location detection of spherical red markers attached to the heliostats. The most accurate method is method A which has a mean accuracy of 0.17 mrad. The mean accuracy of method B variant 1 is 1.36 mrad and of variant 2 is 1.73 mrad. Method C has a mean accuracy of 15.07 mrad. For method B there is great potential regarding improving the measurement accuracy. For method C the collected data was not sufficient for determining whether or not there is potential for improving the accuracy.