Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (88) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (88) (remove)
Keywords
- Chemometrics (2)
- Earthquake (2)
- Heparin (2)
- NMR spectroscopy (2)
- biosensors (2)
- damage (2)
- Algal Turf Scrubber (1)
- Algal–bacterial bioflm (1)
- Alkalihalobacillus okhensis (1)
- Alzheimer's disease (1)
- Anforderungen (1)
- Anschlüsse an Stahlbeton (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Assembly (1)
- Automated driving (1)
- Automotive application (1)
- BIM (1)
- Basisisolierung (1)
- Bauwerksüberwachung (1)
- Behaviour factor q (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (32)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (22)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (14)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (13)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (10)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (6)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (6)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (6)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (5)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (5)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (3)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (3)
- Fachbereich Architektur (2)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (2)
- FH Aachen (1)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (1)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (1)
- IMP - Institut für Mikrowellen- und Plasmatechnik (1)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (1)
- Nowum-Energy (1)
The European Union's aim to become climate neutral by 2050 necessitates ambitious efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Large reductions can be attained particularly in energy intensive sectors like iron and steel. In order to prevent the relocation of such industries outside the EU in the course of tightening environmental regulations, the establishment of a climate club jointly with other large emitters and alternatively the unilateral implementation of an international cross-border carbon tax mechanism are proposed. This article focuses on the latter option choosing the steel sector as an example. In particular, we investigate the financial conditions under which a European cross border mechanism is capable to protect hydrogen-based steel production routes employed in Europe against more polluting competition from abroad. By using a floor price model, we assess the competitiveness of different steel production routes in selected countries. We evaluate the climate friendliness of steel production on the basis of specific GHG emissions. In addition, we utilize an input-output price model. It enables us to assess impacts of rising cost of steel production on commodities using steel as intermediates. Our results raise concerns that a cross-border tax mechanism will not suffice to bring about competitiveness of hydrogen-based steel production in Europe because the cost tends to remain higher than the cost of steel production in e.g. China. Steel is a classic example for a good used mainly as intermediate for other products. Therefore, a cross-border tax mechanism for steel will increase the price of products produced in the EU that require steel as an input. This can in turn adversely affect competitiveness of these sectors. Hence, the effects of higher steel costs on European exports should be borne in mind and could require the cross-border adjustment mechanism to also subsidize exports.