Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (281) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (58)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (43)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (41)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (41)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (40)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (35)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (19)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (15)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (13)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (11)
Has Fulltext
- no (281) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (138)
- Conference Proceeding (55)
- Part of a Book (31)
- Book (21)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (15)
- Report (8)
- Other (6)
- Patent (2)
- Conference Poster (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
Planning the layout and operation of a technical system is a common task
for an engineer. Typically, the workflow is divided into consecutive stages: First,
the engineer designs the layout of the system, with the help of his experience or of
heuristic methods. Secondly, he finds a control strategy which is often optimized
by simulation. This usually results in a good operating of an unquestioned sys-
tem topology. In contrast, we apply Operations Research (OR) methods to find a
cost-optimal solution for both stages simultaneously via mixed integer program-
ming (MILP). Technical Operations Research (TOR) allows one to find a provable
global optimal solution within the model formulation. However, the modeling error
due to the abstraction of physical reality remains unknown. We address this ubiq-
uitous problem of OR methods by comparing our computational results with mea-
surements in a test rig. For a practical test case we compute a topology and control
strategy via MILP and verify that the objectives are met up to a deviation of 8.7%.