Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Article (1)
Keywords
- Energy storage (4)
- Power plants (4)
- Associated liquids (3)
- Concentrated solar power (3)
- Hybrid energy system (3)
- Electricity generation (2)
- Solar thermal technologies (2)
- Camera system (1)
- Ceramics (1)
- Cloud passages (1)
- Control optimization (1)
- DNI forecast (1)
- DNI forecasting (1)
- Decision theory (1)
- Direct normal irradiance forecast (1)
- Dynamic simulation (1)
- Electrochemistry (1)
- Global change (1)
- Heliostat Field Calibration (1)
- Heliostats (1)
- Measuring instruments (1)
- Molten salt receiver (1)
- Molten salt receiver system (1)
- Molten salt receiver system, (1)
- Molten salt solar tower (1)
- Nowcasting (1)
- PTC (1)
- Parabolic trough collector (1)
- Photovoltaics (1)
- Process prediction (1)
- Quadrocopter (1)
- Solar irradiance (1)
- Star design (1)
- Thermal Energy Storage (1)
- Transient flux distribution (1)
- Two-phase modelling (1)
- UAV (1)
- Uncertainty analysis (1)
- Unmanned aerial vehicle (1)
Institute
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (12) (remove)
In this work, three patent pending calibration methods for heliostat fields of central receiver systems (CRS) developed by the Solar-Institut Jülich (SIJ) of the FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences are presented. The calibration methods can either operate in a combined mode or in stand-alone mode. The first calibration method, method A, foresees that a camera matrix is placed into the receiver plane where it is subjected to concentrated solar irradiance during a measurement process. The second calibration method, method B, uses an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) such as a quadrocopter to automatically fly into the reflected solar irradiance cross-section of one or more heliostats (two variants of method B were tested). The third calibration method, method C, foresees a stereo central camera or multiple stereo cameras installed e.g. on the solar tower whereby the orientations of the heliostats are calculated from the location detection of spherical red markers attached to the heliostats. The most accurate method is method A which has a mean accuracy of 0.17 mrad. The mean accuracy of method B variant 1 is 1.36 mrad and of variant 2 is 1.73 mrad. Method C has a mean accuracy of 15.07 mrad. For method B there is great potential regarding improving the measurement accuracy. For method C the collected data was not sufficient for determining whether or not there is potential for improving the accuracy.