Refine
Year of publication
- 2006 (160) (remove)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (64)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (21)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (20)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (18)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (17)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (15)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (12)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (12)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (7)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (3)
Language
- English (160) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (86)
- Conference Proceeding (60)
- Book (9)
- Lecture (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Master's Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- Biosensor (23)
- Technische Mechanik (2)
- biosensor (2)
- 3-nitrofluoranthene (1)
- Asteroid Deflection (1)
- BTEX compounds (1)
- Bauingenieurwesen (1)
- Biosensorik (1)
- Bruchmechanik (1)
- CAD (1)
- CO (1)
- Conducing polymer (1)
- ECT (1)
- EPN (1)
- Elastostatics (1)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (1)
- Fluorescence (1)
- GaAs hot electron injector (1)
- Gas sensor (1)
- Gunn diode (1)
- Hand-on-training (1)
- Heavy metal detection (1)
- High throughput experimentation (1)
- Hotplate (1)
- Hydrogen sensor (1)
- I3S 2005 (1)
- ISFET (1)
- International Symposium on Sensor Science (1)
- Kinematics (1)
- Kinetics (1)
- LED chip (1)
- Level sensor (1)
- MEMS ; education and training foundry (1)
- Main sensitivity (1)
- Mechanics (1)
- Microreactors (1)
- Nanoparticles (1)
- Nanostructuring (1)
- Organophosphorus (1)
- Ostazine Orange (1)
- PFM (1)
- Phenylalanine determination (1)
- Planetary Protection (1)
- Potentiometry (1)
- Pseudomonas putida (1)
- Quartz crystal nanobalance (QCN) (1)
- Quartz micro balances (1)
- Rapid Prototyping (1)
- Rapid Technologie (1)
- Rapid prototyping (1)
- Reaction-diffusion (1)
- Solar Sail (1)
- Solid amalgam electrodes (1)
- Statics (1)
- Technologietransfer (1)
- Telekommunikationsmarkt (1)
- Tin oxide (1)
- Trajectory Optimization (1)
- Virtual Technology Lab (1)
- Virtuelles Labor (1)
- Virtuelles Laboratorium (1)
- Wafer (1)
- ammonia gas sensors (1)
- amperometric sensor (1)
- antimony doped tin oxide (1)
- capillary micro-droplet cell (1)
- carcinogens (1)
- catalytic decomposition (1)
- chemical reduction method (1)
- civil engineering (1)
- cross sensitivity (1)
- doped metal oxide (1)
- doped silicon (1)
- doping (1)
- electrical capacitance tomography (1)
- electro-migration (1)
- electronic noses dendronized polymers inverted mesa technology (1)
- enzymatic methods (1)
- enzyme immobilisation (1)
- fenitrothion (1)
- fluidic (1)
- gas sensor (1)
- gas sensor array (1)
- heater metallisation (1)
- high-temperature stability (1)
- humidity (1)
- hydrogen peroxide (1)
- image sensor (1)
- imaging (1)
- impedance spectroscopy (1)
- ion-selective electrodes (1)
- lab-on-a-chip (1)
- lab-on-chip (1)
- layer expansion (1)
- lenslet array (1)
- magnetic particles (1)
- matrix method (1)
- metal oxide (1)
- microreactor (1)
- microwave generation (1)
- modeling biosensor (1)
- modelling (1)
- modified electrode (1)
- multi-interface measurement (1)
- nitrogen oxides (1)
- organic PVC membranes (1)
- pH-based biosensing (1)
- pattern-size reduction (1)
- polymer composites (1)
- porous Pt electrode (1)
- principal component (1)
- probabilistic fracture mechanics (1)
- quantum charging (1)
- screen-printing (1)
- self-aligned patterning (1)
- sensing properties (1)
- sterilisation (1)
- surface modification (1)
- swift heavy ions (1)
- technology diffusion (1)
- technology transfer (1)
- thick-film technology (1)
- thin-film microsensors (1)
- voltammetry (1)
- wafer-level testing (1)
In: Technical feasibility and reliability of passive safety systems for nuclear power plants. Proceedings of an Advisory Group Meeting held in Jülich, 21-24 November 1994. - Vienna , 1996. - Seite: 43 - 55 IAEA-TECDOC-920 Abstract: It is shown that the difficulty for probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) is the general problem of the high reliability of a small population. There is no way around the problem as yet. Therefore what PFM can contribute to the reliability of steel pressure boundaries is demonstrated with the example of a typical reactor pressure vessel and critically discussed. Although no method is distinguishable that could give exact failure probabilities, PFM has several additional chances. Upper limits for failure probability may be obtained together with trends for design and operating conditions. Further, PFM can identify the most sensitive parameters, improved control of which would increase reliability. Thus PFM should play a vital role in the analysis of steel pressure boundaries despite all shortcomings.