Part of a Book
Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (22) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (22) (remove)
Keywords
- Best practice sharing (1)
- Cognitive assistance system (1)
- Collagen fibrils (1)
- Connective tissues (1)
- Digital leadership (1)
- Experteninterviews (1)
- Extracellular matrix (ECM) (1)
- Gamification (1)
- Human-centered work design (1)
- Human-robot collaboration (1)
- Ice melting probe (1)
- Ice penetration (1)
- Icy moons (1)
- Leaderboard (1)
- Mars (1)
- Mechanical stability (1)
- Ocean worlds (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Prozessauswahl (1)
- Prozessautomatisierung (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (9)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (3)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (3)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (2)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (2)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (2)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (2)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (2)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (2)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (1)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (1)
- Nowum-Energy (1)
AI-based systems are nearing ubiquity not only in everyday low-stakes activities but also in medical procedures. To protect patients and physicians alike, explainability requirements have been proposed for the operation of AI-based decision support systems (AI-DSS), which adds hurdles to the productive use of AI in clinical contexts. This raises two questions: Who decides these requirements? And how should access to AI-DSS be provided to communities that reject these standards (particularly when such communities are expert-scarce)? This chapter investigates a dilemma that emerges from the implementation of global AI governance. While rejecting global AI governance limits the ability to help communities in need, global AI governance risks undermining and subjecting health-insecure communities to the force of the neo-colonial world order. For this, this chapter first surveys the current landscape of AI governance and introduces the approach of relational egalitarianism as key to (global health) justice. To discuss the two horns of the referred dilemma, the core power imbalances faced by health-insecure collectives (HICs) are examined. The chapter argues that only strong demands of a dual strategy towards health-secure collectives can both remedy the immediate needs of HICs and enable them to become healthcare independent.