Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (268) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (116)
- Conference Proceeding (80)
- Part of a Book (27)
- Book (23)
- Other (10)
- Report (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Patent (1)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- Technical Operations Research (2)
- Additive Manufacturing (1)
- Annulus Fibrosus (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Asymptotic efficiency (1)
- Bacillus atrophaeus (1)
- Balance (1)
- Balanced hypergraph (1)
- Brandfall (1)
- Building Systems (1)
- Business Simulations (1)
- Cardiac myocytes (1)
- Cardiac tissue (1)
- CellDrum (1)
- Censored data (1)
- Co-managed care (1)
- Collaborative robot (1)
- Computational biomechanics (1)
- Controller Parameter (1)
- DNA biosensor (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (54)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (36)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (35)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (35)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (35)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (31)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (27)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (25)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (17)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (15)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (11)
- Institut fuer Angewandte Polymerchemie (5)
- Nowum-Energy (5)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (5)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (5)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (4)
- Fachbereich Architektur (4)
- FH Aachen (2)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (2)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (1)
A comparative performance analysis of the CFD platforms OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D is presented, focusing on a 3D swirling turbulent flow: a steady hydraulic jump at low Reynolds number. Turbulence is treated using RANS approach RNG k-ε. A Volume Of Fluid (VOF) method is used to track the air–water interface, consequently aeration is modeled using an Eulerian–Eulerian approach. Structured meshes of cubic elements are used to discretize the channel geometry. The numerical model accuracy is assessed comparing representative hydraulic jump variables (sequent depth ratio, roller length, mean velocity profiles, velocity decay or free surface profile) to experimental data. The model results are also compared to previous studies to broaden the result validation. Both codes reproduced the phenomenon under study concurring with experimental data, although special care must be taken when swirling flows occur. Both models can be used to reproduce the hydraulic performance of energy dissipation structures at low Reynolds numbers.