Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (49)
- 2023 (114)
- 2022 (143)
- 2021 (154)
- 2020 (171)
- 2019 (194)
- 2018 (171)
- 2017 (154)
- 2016 (158)
- 2015 (176)
- 2014 (167)
- 2013 (173)
- 2012 (163)
- 2011 (189)
- 2010 (185)
- 2009 (189)
- 2008 (156)
- 2007 (149)
- 2006 (160)
- 2005 (130)
- 2004 (161)
- 2003 (106)
- 2002 (130)
- 2001 (106)
- 2000 (108)
- 1999 (109)
- 1998 (99)
- 1997 (99)
- 1996 (81)
- 1995 (78)
- 1994 (86)
- 1993 (59)
- 1992 (54)
- 1991 (29)
- 1990 (39)
- 1989 (45)
- 1988 (57)
- 1987 (32)
- 1986 (19)
- 1985 (34)
- 1984 (22)
- 1983 (20)
- 1982 (29)
- 1981 (20)
- 1980 (36)
- 1979 (24)
- 1978 (34)
- 1977 (14)
- 1976 (13)
- 1975 (12)
- 1974 (3)
- 1973 (2)
- 1972 (2)
- 1971 (1)
- 1968 (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1689)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (718)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (624)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (588)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (557)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (551)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (497)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (279)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (217)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (165)
Language
- English (4909) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3277)
- Conference Proceeding (1162)
- Part of a Book (191)
- Book (144)
- Doctoral Thesis (30)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (28)
- Patent (25)
- Other (10)
- Report (9)
- Conference Poster (6)
Keywords
- Biosensor (25)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (12)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (10)
- CAD (8)
- civil engineering (8)
- Bauingenieurwesen (7)
- Blitzschutz (6)
- FEM (6)
- Gamification (6)
- Limit analysis (6)
Silos generally work as storage structures between supply and demand for various goods, and their structural safety has long been of interest to the civil engineering profession. This is especially true for dynamically loaded silos, e.g., in case of seismic excitation. Particularly thin-walled cylindrical silos are highly vulnerable to seismic induced pressures, which can cause critical buckling phenomena of the silo shell. The analysis of silos can be carried out in two different ways. In the first, the seismic loading is modeled through statically equivalent loads acting on the shell. Alternatively, a time history analysis might be carried out, in which nonlinear phenomena due to the filling as well as the interaction between the shell and the granular material are taken into account. The paper presents a comparison of these approaches. The model used for the nonlinear time history analysis considers the granular material by means of the intergranular strain approach for hypoplasticity theory. The interaction effects between the granular material and the shell is represented by contact elements. Additionally, soil–structure interaction effects are taken into account.
A further development of the Added-Mass-Method allows the combined representation of the effects of both soil-structure-interaction and fluid-structure interaction on a liquid-filled-tank in one model. This results in a practical method for describing the dynamic fluid pressure on the tank shell during joint movement. The fluid pressure is calculated on the basis of the tank's eigenform and the earthquake acceleration and represented by additional masses on the shell. The bearing on compliant ground is represented by replacement springs, which are calculated dependent on the local soil composition. The influence of the shear modulus of the compliant soil is clearly visible in the pressure curves and the stress distribution in the shell. The acceleration spectra are also dependent on soil stiffness. According to Eurocode-8 the acceleration spectra are determined for fixed soil-classes, instead of calculating the accelerations for each site in direct dependence on the soil composition. This leads to unrealistic sudden changes in the system's response. Therefore, earthquake spectra are calculated for different soil models in direct dependence of the shear modulus. Thus, both the acceleration spectra and the replacement springs match the soil composition. This enables a reasonable and consistent calculation of the system response for the actual conditions at each site.
Reinforced concrete (RC) structures with masonry infills are widely used for several types of buildings all over the world. However, it is well known that traditional masonry infills constructed with rigid contact to the surrounding RC frame performed rather poor in past earthquakes. Masonry infills showed severe in-plane damages and failed in many cases under out-of-plane seismic loading. As the undesired interactions between frames and infills changes the load transfer on building level, complete collapses of buildings were observed. A possible solution is uncoupling of masonry infills to the frame to reduce the infill contribution activated by the frame deformation under horizontal loading. The paper presents numerical simulations on RC frames equipped with the innovative decoupling system INODIS. The system was developed within the European project INSYSME and allows an effective uncoupling of frame and infill. The simulations are carried out with a micro-modelling approach, which is able to predict the complex nonlinear behaviour resulting from the different materials and their interaction. Each brick is modelled individually and connected taking into account nonlinearity of a brick mortar interface. The calibration of the model is based on small specimen tests and experimental results for one bay one storey frame are used for the validation. The validated model is further used for parametric studies on two storey and two bay infilled frames. The response and change of the structural stiffness are analysed and compared to the traditionally infilled frame. The results confirm the effectiveness of the INODIS system with less damage and relatively low contribution of the infill at high drift levels. In contrast to the uncoupled system configurations, traditionally infilled frames experienced brittle failure at rather low drift levels.
The article presents the investigation of the seismic behaviour of a modern URM building located in the municipality of Finale Emilia in province of Modena, Northern Italy. The building is situated in the centre of the series of the 2012 Northern Italy earthquakes and has not suffered any damage during the earthquake series in 2012. The observed earthquake resistance of the building is compared with predicted resistances based on linear and nonlinear design approaches according to Eurocode. Furthermore, probabilistic analyses based on nonlinear calculation models taking into account scattering of the most relevant input parameters are carried out to identify their influence to the results and to derive fragility curves.