Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (1928)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (1150)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1119)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (1066)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (892)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (801)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (769)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (664)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (627)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (585)
Has Fulltext
- no (9284) (remove)
Language
Document Type
- Article (5518)
- Conference Proceeding (1413)
- Book (1057)
- Part of a Book (555)
- Patent (174)
- Bachelor Thesis (169)
- Report (82)
- Doctoral Thesis (79)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (75)
- Other (67)
Keywords
- Illustration (10)
- Nachhaltigkeit (10)
- Corporate Design (9)
- Erscheinungsbild (8)
- Gamification (8)
- Redesign (7)
- Animation (6)
- Datenschutz (6)
- Deutschland (6)
- Digitalisierung (6)
Begriffsbestimmungen
(2014)
Recent earthquakes showed that low-rise URM buildings following codecompliant seismic design and details behaved in general very well without substantial damages. Although advances in simulation tools make nonlinear calculation methods more readily accessible to designers, linear analyses will still be the standard design method for years to come. The present paper aims to improve the linear seismic design method by providing a proper definition of the q-factor of URM buildings. Values of q-factors are derived for low-rise URM buildings with rigid diaphragms, with reference to modern structural configurations realized in low to moderate seismic areas of Italy and Germany. The behaviour factor components for deformation and energy dissipation capacity and for overstrength due to the redistribution of forces are derived by means of pushover analyses. As a result of the investigations, rationally based values of the behaviour factor q to be used in linear analyses in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 are proposed.
Beispiel Betoninstandsetzung
(2006)
Beitrag zur Zuverlässigkeitstheorie von Tragwerken unter Berücksichtigung nichtlinearen Verhaltens
(1980)
In the future, we expect manufacturing companies to follow a new paradigm that mandates more automation and autonomy in production processes. Such smart factories will offer a variety of production technologies as services that can be combined ad hoc to produce a large number of different product types and variants cost-effectively even in small lot sizes. This is enabled by cyber-physical systems that feature flexible automated planning methods for production scheduling, execution control, and in-factory logistics.
During development, testbeds are required to determine the applicability of integrated systems in such scenarios. Furthermore, benchmarks are needed to quantify and compare system performance in these industry-inspired scenarios at a comprehensible and manageable size which is, at the same time, complex enough to yield meaningful results.
In this chapter, based on our experience in the RoboCup Logistics League (RCLL) as a specific example, we derive a generic blueprint for how a holistic benchmark can be developed, which combines a specific scenario with a set of key performance indicators as metrics to evaluate the overall integrated system and its components.
Benchmarking of various LiDAR sensors for use in self-driving vehicles in real-world environments
(2022)
Abstract
In this paper, we report on our benchmark results of the LiDAR sensors Livox Horizon, Robosense M1, Blickfeld Cube, Blickfeld Cube Range, Velodyne Velarray H800, and Innoviz Pro. The idea was to test the sensors in different typical scenarios that were defined with real-world use cases in mind, in order to find a sensor that meet the requirements of self-driving vehicles. For this, we defined static and dynamic benchmark scenarios. In the static scenarios, both LiDAR and the detection target do not move during the measurement. In dynamic scenarios, the LiDAR sensor was mounted on the vehicle which was driving toward the detection target. We tested all mentioned LiDAR sensors in both scenarios, show the results regarding the detection accuracy of the targets, and discuss their usefulness for deployment in self-driving cars.