Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (146) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (75)
- Conference Proceeding (58)
- Part of a Book (10)
- Other (1)
- Patent (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- solar sail (5)
- Eisschicht (3)
- GOSSAMER-1 (3)
- MASCOT (3)
- Sonde (3)
- Mars (2)
- Solar sail (2)
- Spacecraft (2)
- Trajectory Optimization (2)
- multiple NEA rendezvous (2)
- small spacecraft (2)
- Analogue Environments (1)
- Antarctic Glaciology (1)
- Antarctica (1)
- Asteroid Deflection (1)
- Attitude dynamics (1)
- Autofluoreszenzverfahren (1)
- Automated Optimization (1)
- Cryobot (1)
- DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER roadmap for solar sailing (1)
- Evolutionary Neurocontrol (1)
- Extraterrestrial Glaciology (1)
- Glaciological instruments and methods (1)
- Gossamer (1)
- Gossamer structures (1)
- Hybrid Propellants (1)
- Ice Melting (1)
- Ice melting probe (1)
- Ice penetration (1)
- Icy Moons (1)
- Icy moons (1)
- Interplanetary flight (1)
- Interstellar objects (1)
- Jupiter (1)
- Lichtstreuungsbasierte Instrumente (1)
- Low-Thrust Propulsion (1)
- Melting Efficiency (1)
- Melting Performance (1)
- Melting Probe (1)
- Missions (1)
- Multiphase (1)
- Ocean Worlds (1)
- Ocean worlds (1)
- Orbital dynamics (1)
- PHILAE (1)
- Planetary Protection (1)
- Planetary exploration (1)
- Reusable Rocket Engines (1)
- Sequence-Search (1)
- Small Solar System Body Lander (1)
- Small Spacecraft (1)
- Small spacecraft (1)
- Solar Power Sail (1)
- Solar Sail (1)
- Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization (1)
- Subclacial exploration (1)
- Subglacial lakes (1)
- Trajectories (1)
- asteroid lander (1)
- asteroid sample return (1)
- attitude dynamics (1)
- autofluorescence-based detection system (1)
- flotilla missions (1)
- habitability (1)
- heliosphere (1)
- ice moons (1)
- icy moons (1)
- ion propulsion (1)
- life detection (1)
- light scattering analysis (1)
- low-thrust (1)
- low-thrust trajectory optimization (1)
- near-Earth asteroid (1)
- orbit control (1)
- orbital dynamics (1)
- planetary defence (1)
- responsive space (1)
- sailcraft (1)
- sample return (1)
- small solar system body characterisation (1)
- small spacecraft asteroid lander (1)
- small spacecraft solar sail (1)
- solar sails (1)
- solar system (1)
- space missions (1)
- subglacial aquatic ecosystems (1)
- subsurface ice (1)
- subsurface ice research (1)
- subsurface probe (1)
- system engineering (1)
- underwater vehicle (1)
Interplanetary trajectories for low-thrust spacecraft are often characterized by multiple revolutions around the sun. Unfortunately, the convergence of traditional trajectory optimizers that are based on numerical optimal control methods depends strongly on an adequate initial guess for the control function (if a direct method is used) or for the starting values of the adjoint vector (if an indirect method is used). Especially when many revolutions around the sun are re-
quired, trajectory optimization becomes a very difficult and time-consuming task that involves a lot of experience and expert knowledge in astrodynamics and optimal control theory, because an adequate initial guess is extremely hard to find. Evolutionary neurocontrol (ENC) was proposed as a smart method for low-thrust trajectory optimization that fuses artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms to so-called evolutionary neurocontrollers (ENCs) [1]. Inspired by natural archetypes, ENC attacks the trajectoryoptimization problem from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning, a perspective that is quite different from that of optimal control theory. Within the context of ENC, a trajectory is regarded as the result of a spacecraft steering strategy that maps permanently the actual spacecraft state and the actual target state onto the actual spacecraft control vector. This way, the problem of searching the optimal spacecraft trajectory is equivalent to the problem of searching (or "learning") the optimal spacecraft steering strategy. An artificial neural network is used to implement such a spacecraft steering strategy. It can be regarded as a parameterized function (the network function) that is defined by the internal network parameters. Therefore, each distinct set of network parameters defines a different network function and thus a different steering strategy. The problem of searching the optimal steering strategy is now equivalent to the problem of searching the optimal set of network parameters. Evolutionary algorithms that work on a population of (artificial) chromosomes are used to find the optimal network parameters, because the parameters can be easily mapped onto a chromosome. The trajectory optimization problem is solved when the optimal chromosome is found. A comparison of solar sail trajectories that have been published by others [2, 3, 4, 5] with ENC-trajectories has shown that ENCs can be successfully applied for near-globally optimal spacecraft control [1, 6] and that they are able to find trajectories that are closer to the (unknown) global optimum, because they explore the trajectory search space more exhaustively than a human expert can do. The obtained trajectories are fairly accurate with respect to the terminal constraint. If a more accurate trajectory is required, the ENC-solution can be used as an initial guess for a local trajectory optimization method. Using ENC, low-thrust trajectories can be optimized without an initial guess and without expert attendance.
Here, new results for nuclear electric spacecraft and for solar sail spacecraft are presented and it will be shown that ENCs find very good trajectories even for very difficult problems. Trajectory optimization results are presented for 1. NASA's Solar Polar Imager Mission, a mission to attain a highly inclined close solar orbit with a solar sail [7] 2. a mission to de ect asteroid Apophis with a solar sail from a retrograde orbit with a very-high velocity impact [8, 9] 3. JPL's \2nd Global Trajectory Optimization Competition", a grand tour to visit four asteroids from different classes with a NEP spacecraft
In this chapter, the key technologies and the instrumentation required for the subsurface exploration of ocean worlds are discussed. The focus is laid on Jupiter’s moon Europa and Saturn’s moon Enceladus because they have the highest potential for such missions in the near future. The exploration of their oceans requires landing on the surface, penetrating the thick ice shell with an ice-penetrating probe, and probably diving with an underwater vehicle through dozens of kilometers of water to the ocean floor, to have the chance to find life, if it exists. Technologically, such missions are extremely challenging. The required key technologies include power generation, communications, pressure resistance, radiation hardness, corrosion protection, navigation, miniaturization, autonomy, and sterilization and cleaning. Simpler mission concepts involve impactors and penetrators or – in the case of Enceladus – plume-fly-through missions.
The recently discovered first hyperbolic objects passing through the Solar System, 1I/’Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov, have raised the question about near term missions to Interstellar Objects. In situ spacecraft exploration of these objects will allow the direct determination of both their structure and their chemical and isotopic composition, enabling an entirely new way of studying small bodies from outside our solar system. In this paper, we map various Interstellar Object classes to mission types, demonstrating that missions to a range of Interstellar Object classes are feasible, using existing or near-term technology. We describe flyby, rendezvous and sample return missions to interstellar objects, showing various ways to explore these bodies characterizing their surface, dynamics, structure and composition. Their direct exploration will constrain their formation and history, situating them within the dynamical and chemical evolution of the Galaxy. These mission types also provide the opportunity to explore solar system bodies and perform measurements in the far outer solar system.