Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (7)
- 2023 (7)
- 2022 (28)
- 2021 (28)
- 2020 (32)
- 2019 (39)
- 2018 (33)
- 2017 (31)
- 2016 (26)
- 2015 (28)
- 2014 (18)
- 2013 (22)
- 2012 (23)
- 2011 (21)
- 2010 (31)
- 2009 (29)
- 2008 (29)
- 2007 (24)
- 2006 (17)
- 2005 (21)
- 2004 (24)
- 2003 (15)
- 2002 (9)
- 2001 (3)
- 2000 (8)
- 1999 (6)
- 1998 (7)
- 1997 (5)
- 1996 (4)
- 1995 (3)
- 1994 (3)
- 1993 (4)
- 1992 (1)
- 1990 (1)
- 1989 (2)
- 1988 (4)
- 1987 (2)
- 1986 (1)
- 1985 (1)
- 1980 (2)
Institute
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (540)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (451)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (135)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (11)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (5)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (1)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (1)
- Senat (1)
Has Fulltext
- no (599) (remove)
Language
- English (599) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (436)
- Conference Proceeding (108)
- Part of a Book (34)
- Book (9)
- Other (4)
- Patent (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- solar sail (5)
- CellDrum (3)
- GOSSAMER-1 (3)
- MASCOT (3)
- Biocomposites (2)
- Iterative learning control (2)
- Limit analysis (2)
- Mars (2)
- Natural fibres (2)
- Polymer-matrix composites (2)
Enceladus explorer - A maneuverable subsurface probe for autonomous navigation through deep ice
(2012)
This paper describes the results and methods used during the 8th Global Trajectory Optimization Competition (GTOC) of the DLR team. Trajectory optimization is crucial for most of the space missions and usually can be formulated as a global optimization problem. A lot of research has been done to different type of mission problems. The most demanding ones are low thrust transfers with e.g. gravity assist sequences. In that case the optimal control problem is combined with an integer problem. In most of the GTOCs we apply a filtering of the problem based on domain knowledge.
Searching optimal interplanetary trajectories for low-thrust spacecraft is usually a difficult and time-consuming task that involves much experience and expert knowledge in astrodynamics and optimal control theory. This is because the convergence behavior of traditional local optimizers, which are based on numerical optimal control methods, depends on an adequate initial guess, which is often hard to find, especially for very-low-thrust trajectories that necessitate many revolutions around the sun. The obtained solutions are typically close to the initial guess that is rarely close to the (unknown) global optimum. Within this paper, trajectory optimization problems are attacked from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning. Inspired by natural archetypes, a smart global method for low-thrust trajectory optimization is proposed that fuses artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms into so-called evolutionary neurocontrollers. This novel method runs without an initial guess and does not require the attendance of an expert in astrodynamics and optimal control theory. This paper details how evolutionary neurocontrol works and how it could be implemented. The performance of the method is assessed for three different interplanetary missions with a thrust to mass ratio <0.15mN/kg (solar sail and nuclear electric).
The recently proposed NASA and ESA missions to Saturn and Jupiter pose difficult tasks to mission designers because chemical propulsion scenarios are not capable of transferring heavy spacecraft into the outer solar system without the use of gravity assists. Thus our developed mission scenario based on the joint NASA/ESA Titan Saturn System Mission baselines solar electric propulsion to improve mission flexibility and transfer time. For the calculation of near-globally optimal low-thrust trajectories, we have used a method called Evolutionary Neurocontrol, which is implemented in the low-thrust trajectory optimization software InTrance. The studied solar electric propulsion scenario covers trajectory optimization of the interplanetary transfer including variations of the spacecraft's thrust level, the thrust unit's specific impulse and the solar power generator power level. Additionally developed software extensions enabled trajectory optimization with launcher-provided hyperbolic excess energy, a complex solar power generator model and a variable specific impulse ion engine model. For the investigated mission scenario, Evolutionary Neurocontrol yields good optimization results, which also hold valid for the more elaborate spacecraft models. Compared to Cassini/Huygens, the best found solutions have faster transfer times and a higher mission flexibility in general.
A technology reference study for a solar polar mission is presented. The study uses novel analytical methods to quantify the mission design space including the required sail performance to achieve a given solar polar observation angle within a given timeframe and thus to derive mass allocations for the remaining spacecraft sub-systems, that is excluding the solar sail sub-system. A parametric, bottom-up, system mass budget analysis is then used to establish the required sail technology to deliver a range of science payloads, and to establish where such payloads can be delivered to within a given timeframe. It is found that a solar polar mission requires a solar sail of side-length 100–125 m to deliver a ‘sufficient value’ minimum science payload, and that a 2.5 μm sail film substrate is typically required, however the design is much less sensitive to the boom specific mass.