Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (626)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (622)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (146)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (13)
- Kommission für Forschung und Entwicklung (6)
- Senat (2)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (1)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (1)
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (1)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (1)
Language
- English (646)
- German (120)
- Russian (13)
- Multiple languages (2)
Document Type
- Article (528)
- Conference Proceeding (158)
- Part of a Book (36)
- Book (19)
- Report (12)
- Patent (9)
- Doctoral Thesis (7)
- Other (4)
- Habilitation (3)
- Lecture (3)
Keywords
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (16)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (13)
- shakedown analysis (9)
- FEM (6)
- Limit analysis (6)
- Shakedown analysis (6)
- limit analysis (6)
- Clusterion (5)
- solar sail (5)
- Air purification (4)
Treatment of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the radial column of the elbow joint remains a challenging yet common issue.
While partial joint replacement leads to high revision rates, radial head excision has shown to severely increase joint instability. Shortening osteotomy of the radius could be an option to decrease the contact pressure of the radiohumeral joint and thereby pain levels without causing valgus instability. Hence, the aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate the effects of radial shortening on axial load distribution and valgus stability of the elbow joint.
Reliability of the Primary Circuit Pressure Boundary of an HTR-Module under Accident Conditions
(1993)
Kyphoplasty of Osteoporotic Fractured Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis about Two Types of Cement
(2019)
A 3D finite element model of the female pelvic floor for the reconstruction of urinary incontinence
(2014)
Load bearing capacity of thin shell structures made of elastoplastic material by direct methods
(2008)
Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratcheting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range. In cyclic plasticity more sophisticated hardening models have been suggested in order to model the strain evolution observed in ratcheting experiments. The hardening models used in shakedown analysis are comparatively simple. It is shown that shakedown analysis can make quite stable predictions of admissible load ranges despite the simplicity of the underlying hardening models. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis. Both give identical or similar shakedown ranges. Structural shakedown analyses show that the loading may have a more pronounced effect than the hardening model.