Refine
Year of publication
Institute
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (74) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (74) (remove)
Keywords
The existence of several mobile operating systems, such as Android and iOS, is a challenge for developers because the individual platforms are not compatible with each other and require separate app developments. For this reason, cross-platform approaches have become popular but lack in cloning the native behavior of the different operating systems. Out of the plenty cross-platform approaches, the progressive web app (PWA) approach is perceived as promising but needs further investigation. Therefore, the paper at hand aims at investigating whether PWAs are a suitable alternative for native apps by developing a PWA clone of an existing app. Two surveys are conducted in which potential users test and evaluate the PWA prototype with regard to its usability. The survey results indicate that PWAs have great potential, but cannot be treated as a general alternative to native apps. For guiding developers when and how to use PWAs, four design guidelines for the development of PWA-based apps are derived based on the results.
Das Werk kommentiert leicht verständlich, aktuell und praxisnah die DSGVO sowie das BDSG und - neu - auch das TTDSG (Telekommunikation-Telemedien-Datenschutzgesetz). Verantwortliche erhalten damit eine umfassende Darstellung mit Handlungsempfehlungen zum gesamten neuen Datenschutzrecht. Betriebliche Datenschutzbeauftragte können sich an den fundierten Kommentierungen orientieren, in denen Literatur und Rechtsprechung aktuell berücksichtigt wurden.
Wettbewerbsregeln (§§ 24-27)
(2022)
AI-based systems are nearing ubiquity not only in everyday low-stakes activities but also in medical procedures. To protect patients and physicians alike, explainability requirements have been proposed for the operation of AI-based decision support systems (AI-DSS), which adds hurdles to the productive use of AI in clinical contexts. This raises two questions: Who decides these requirements? And how should access to AI-DSS be provided to communities that reject these standards (particularly when such communities are expert-scarce)? This chapter investigates a dilemma that emerges from the implementation of global AI governance. While rejecting global AI governance limits the ability to help communities in need, global AI governance risks undermining and subjecting health-insecure communities to the force of the neo-colonial world order. For this, this chapter first surveys the current landscape of AI governance and introduces the approach of relational egalitarianism as key to (global health) justice. To discuss the two horns of the referred dilemma, the core power imbalances faced by health-insecure collectives (HICs) are examined. The chapter argues that only strong demands of a dual strategy towards health-secure collectives can both remedy the immediate needs of HICs and enable them to become healthcare independent.