Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (14) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (14) (remove)
Keywords
- Natural language processing (4)
- Clustering (2)
- Information extraction (2)
- Active learning (1)
- Deep learning (1)
- Information Extraction (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Natural Language Processing (1)
- Natural language understanding (1)
- Process model (1)
- Profile Extraction (1)
- Profile extraction (1)
- Query learning (1)
- Relation classification (1)
- Reproducible research (1)
- Text Mining (1)
- Text mining (1)
- Trustworthy artificial intelligence (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (14) (remove)
This paper presents NLP Lean Programming
framework (NLPf), a new framework
for creating custom natural language processing
(NLP) models and pipelines by utilizing
common software development build systems.
This approach allows developers to train and
integrate domain-specific NLP pipelines into
their applications seamlessly. Additionally,
NLPf provides an annotation tool which improves
the annotation process significantly by
providing a well-designed GUI and sophisticated
way of using input devices. Due to
NLPf’s properties developers and domain experts
are able to build domain-specific NLP
applications more efficiently. NLPf is Opensource
software and available at https://
gitlab.com/schrieveslaach/NLPf.
The integration of frequently changing, volatile product data from different manufacturers into a single catalog is a significant challenge for small and medium-sized e-commerce companies. They rely on timely integrating product data to present them aggregated in an online shop without knowing format specifications, concept understanding of manufacturers, and data quality. Furthermore, format, concepts, and data quality may change at any time. Consequently, integrating product catalogs into a single standardized catalog is often a laborious manual task. Current strategies to streamline or automate catalog integration use techniques based on machine learning, word vectorization, or semantic similarity. However, most approaches struggle with low-quality or real-world data. We propose Attribute Label Ranking (ALR) as a recommendation engine to simplify the integration process of previously unknown, proprietary tabular format into a standardized catalog for practitioners. We evaluate ALR by focusing on the impact of different neural network architectures, language features, and semantic similarity. Additionally, we consider metrics for industrial application and present the impact of ALR in production and its limitations.
The progress in natural language processing (NLP) research over the last years, offers novel business opportunities for companies, as automated user interaction or improved data analysis. Building sophisticated NLP applications requires dealing with modern machine learning (ML) technologies, which impedes enterprises from establishing successful NLP projects. Our experience in applied NLP research projects shows that the continuous integration of research prototypes in production-like environments with quality assurance builds trust in the software and shows convenience and usefulness regarding the business goal. We introduce STAMP 4 NLP as an iterative and incremental process model for developing NLP applications. With STAMP 4 NLP, we merge software engineering principles with best practices from data science. Instantiating our process model allows efficiently creating prototypes by utilizing templates, conventions, and implementations, enabling developers and data scientists to focus on the business goals. Due to our iterative-incremental approach, businesses can deploy an enhanced version of the prototype to their software environment after every iteration, maximizing potential business value and trust early and avoiding the cost of successful yet never deployed experiments.
Supervised machine learning and deep learning require a large amount of labeled data, which data scientists obtain in a manual, and time-consuming annotation process. To mitigate this challenge, Active Learning (AL) proposes promising data points to annotators they annotate next instead of a subsequent or random sample. This method is supposed to save annotation effort while maintaining model performance.
However, practitioners face many AL strategies for different tasks and need an empirical basis to choose between them. Surveys categorize AL strategies into taxonomies without performance indications. Presentations of novel AL strategies compare the performance to a small subset of strategies. Our contribution addresses the empirical basis by introducing a reproducible active learning evaluation (ALE) framework for the comparative evaluation of AL strategies in NLP.
The framework allows the implementation of AL strategies with low effort and a fair data-driven comparison through defining and tracking experiment parameters (e.g., initial dataset size, number of data points per query step, and the budget). ALE helps practitioners to make more informed decisions, and researchers can focus on developing new, effective AL strategies and deriving best practices for specific use cases. With best practices, practitioners can lower their annotation costs. We present a case study to illustrate how to use the framework.