Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (227)
- Bachelor Thesis (141)
- Article (122)
- Administrative publication (76)
- Part of Periodical (61)
- Lecture (30)
- Book (22)
- Report (19)
- Diploma Thesis (12)
- Course Material (9)
- Other (9)
- Study Thesis (5)
- Working Paper (5)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Master's Thesis (3)
- Talk (2)
- Poster (1)
Language
- German (522)
- English (218)
- Portuguese (6)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Spanish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (748) (remove)
Keywords
- Amtliche Mitteilung (71)
- Bachelor (33)
- Aachen University of Applied Sciences (31)
- Master (31)
- Prüfungsordnung (31)
- Bauingenieurwesen (30)
- Lesbare Fassung (28)
- Biosensor (25)
- Fachhochschule Aachen (23)
- Studien- und Prüfungsordnung (21)
- Aachen / Fachhochschule Aachen (20)
- Änderungsordnung (20)
- Blitzschutz (18)
- Elektromobilität (17)
- CAD (16)
- Finite-Elemente-Methode (16)
- civil engineering (14)
- Einspielen <Werkstoff> (13)
- Illustration (12)
- Elektrofahrzeug (11)
Institute
- Fachbereich Gestaltung (151)
- FH Aachen (150)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (145)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (67)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (63)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (48)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (47)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (38)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (34)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (29)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (27)
- Fachbereich Chemie und Biotechnologie (18)
- Fachbereich Architektur (13)
- ZHQ - Bereich Hochschuldidaktik und Evaluation (12)
- ECSM European Center for Sustainable Mobility (6)
- Nowum-Energy (6)
- MASKOR Institut für Mobile Autonome Systeme und Kognitive Robotik (5)
- Solar-Institut Jülich (5)
- Arbeitsstelle fuer Hochschuldidaktik und Studienberatung (1)
- IBB - Institut für Baustoffe und Baukonstruktionen (1)
Smoothed Finite Element Methods for Nonlinear Solid Mechanics Problems: 2D and 3D Case Studies
(2016)
The Smoothed Finite Element Method (SFEM) is presented as an edge-based and a facebased techniques for 2D and 3D boundary value problems, respectively. SFEMs avoid shortcomings of the standard Finite Element Method (FEM) with lower order elements such as overly stiff behavior, poor stress solution, and locking effects. Based on the idea of averaging spatially the standard strain field of the FEM over so-called smoothing domains SFEM calculates the stiffness matrix for the same number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) as those of the FEM. However, the SFEMs significantly improve accuracy and convergence even for distorted meshes and/or nearly incompressible materials.
Numerical results of the SFEMs for a cardiac tissue membrane (thin plate inflation) and an artery (tension of 3D tube) show clearly their advantageous properties in improving accuracy particularly for the distorted meshes and avoiding shear locking effects.
Shock waves, explosions, impacts or cavitation bubble collapses may generate stress waves in solids causing cracks or unexpected dammage due to focussing, physical nonlinearity or interaction with existing cracks. There is a growing interest in wave propagation, which poses many novel problems to experimentalists and theorists.
The nonlinear scalar constitutive equations of gases lead to a change in sound speed from point to point as would be found in linear inhomogeneous (and time dependent) media. The nonlinear tensor constitutive equations of solids introduce the additional local effect of solution dependent anisotropy. The speed of a wave passing through a point changes with propagation direction and its rays are inclined to the front. It is an open question whether the widely used operator splitting techniques achieve a dimensional splitting with physically reasonable results for these multi-dimensional problems. May be this is the main reason why the theoretical and numerical investigations of multi-dimensional wave propagation in nonlinear solids are so far behind gas dynamics. We hope to promote the subject a little by a discussion of some fundamental aspects of the solution of the equations of nonlinear elastodynamics. We use methods of characteristics because they only integrate mathematically exact equations which have a direct physical interpretation.
Improved collapse loads of thick-walled, crack containing pipes and vessels are suggested. Very deep cracks have a residual strength which is better modelled by a global limit load. In all burst tests, the ductility of pressure vessel steels was sufficiently high whereby the burst pressure could be predicted by limit analysis with no need to apply fracture mechanics. The relative prognosis error increases however, for long and deep defects due to uncertainties of geometry and strength data.
Fatigue analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying that thermal ratcheting is limited. To this end it is important to make a clear distintion between the shakedown range and the ratcheting range (continuing deformation). As part of an EU-supported research project, experiments were carried out using a 4-bar model. The experiment comprised a water-cooled internal tube, and three insulated heatable outer test bars. The system was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with alternating temperatures at the outer bars. The test parameters were partly selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses. During the test, temperatures and strains were measured as a function of time. The loads and the resulting stresses were confirmed on an ongoing basis during performance of the test, and after it. Different material models were applied for this incremental elasto-plastic analysis using the ANSYS program. The results of the simulation are used to verify the FEM-based shakedown analysis.
Limit loads can be calculated with the finite element method (FEM) for any component, defect geometry, and loading. FEM suggests that published long crack limit formulae for axial defects under-estimate the burst pressure for internal surface defects in thick pipes while limit loads are not conservative for deep cracks and for pressure loaded crack-faces. Very deep cracks have a residual strength, which is modelled by a global collapse load. These observations are combined to derive new analytical local and global collapse loads. The global collapse loads are close to FEM limit analyses for all crack dimensions.
In the new European standard for unfired pressure vessels, EN 13445-3, there are two approaches for carrying out a Design-by-Analysis that cover both the stress categorization method (Annex C) and the direct route method (Annex B) for a check against global plastic deformation and against progressive plastic deformation. This paper presents the direct route in the language of limit and shakedown analysis. This approach leads to an optimization problem. Its solution with Finite Element Analysis is demonstrated for mechanical and thermal actions. One observation from the examples is that the so-called 3f (3Sm) criterion fails to be a reliable check against progressive plastic deformation. Precise conditions are given, which greatly restrict the applicability of the 3f criterion.
Structural design analyses are conducted with the aim of verifying the exclusion of ratchetting. To this end it is important to make a clear distinction between the shakedown range and the ratchetting range. The performed experiment comprised a hollow tension specimen which was subjected to alternating axial forces, superimposed with constant moments. First, a series of uniaxial tests has been carried out in order to calibrate a bounded kinematic hardening rule. The load parameters have been selected on the basis of previous shakedown analyses with the PERMAS code using a kinematic hardening material model. It is shown that this shakedown analysis gives reasonable agreement between the experimental and the numerical results. A linear and a nonlinear kinematic hardening model of two-surface plasticity are compared in material shakedown analysis.