Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (387) (remove)
Institute
- FH Aachen (74)
- Fachbereich Medizintechnik und Technomathematik (71)
- IfB - Institut für Bioengineering (45)
- Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (44)
- Fachbereich Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik (44)
- Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften (35)
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (28)
- Fachbereich Energietechnik (27)
- Fachbereich Maschinenbau und Mechatronik (27)
- INB - Institut für Nano- und Biotechnologien (20)
Document Type
- Article (123)
- Conference Proceeding (94)
- Administrative publication (72)
- Part of a Book (43)
- Book (25)
- Other (9)
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
- Patent (5)
- Review (4)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (2)
Keywords
- Amtliche Mitteilung (68)
- Bachelor (31)
- Master (29)
- Prüfungsordnung (29)
- Lesbare Fassung (28)
- Studien- und Prüfungsordnung (21)
- Änderungsordnung (20)
- Bauingenieurwesen (17)
- Elektrotechnik (8)
- Holzingenieurwesen (6)
Searching optimal continuous-thrust trajectories is usually a difficult and time-consuming task. The solution quality of traditional optimal-control methods depends strongly on an adequate initial guess because the solution is typically close to the initial guess, which may be far from the (unknown) global optimum. Evolutionary neurocontrol attacks continuous-thrust optimization problems from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning, combining artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms. This chapter describes the method and shows some example results for single- and multi-phase continuous-thrust trajectory optimization problems to assess its performance. Evolutionary neurocontrol can explore the trajectory search space more exhaustively than a human expert can do with traditional optimal-control methods. Especially for difficult problems, it usually finds solutions that are closer to the global optimum. Another fundamental advantage is that continuous-thrust trajectories can be optimized without an initial guess and without expert supervision.
Wind loads have great impact on many engineering structures. Wind storms often cause irreparable damage to the buildings which are exposed to it. Along with the earthquakes, wind represents one of the most common environmental load on structures and is relevant for limit state design. Modern wind codes indicate calculation procedures allowing engineers to deal with structural systems, which are susceptible to conduct wind-excited oscillations. In the codes approximate formulas for wind buffeting are specified which relate the dynamic problem to rather abstract parameter functions. The complete theory behind is not visible in order to simplify the applicability of the procedures. This chapter derives the underlying basic relations of the spectral method for wind buffeting and explains the main important applications of it in order to elucidate part of the theoretical background of computations after the new codes. The stochasticity of the wind processes is addressed, and the analysis of analytical as well as measurement based power spectra is outlined. Short MATLAB codes are added to the Appendix 3 which carry out the computation of a single sided auto-spectrum from a statistically stationary, discrete stochastic process. Two examples are presented.