Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (49)
- Article (26)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Book (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- Hydraulic structures (1)
- Open channels (1)
- PIV (1)
- Physical modeling (1)
- Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (1)
- Q-criterion (1)
- Similitude (1)
- VOF (1)
- coherent structures (1)
- dam-break (1)
- drag force (1)
- energy disspation (1)
- friction (1)
- hydraulic modelling (1)
- model performance (1)
- numerical model (1)
- physical model (1)
- wave run-up (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (81) (remove)
Unsteady shallow meandering flows in rectangular reservoirs: a modal analysis of URANS modelling
(2022)
Shallow flows are common in natural and human-made environments. Even for simple rectangular shallow reservoirs, recent laboratory experiments show that the developing flow fields are particularly complex, involving large-scale turbulent structures. For specific combinations of reservoir size and hydraulic conditions, a meandering jet can be observed. While some aspects of this pseudo-2D flow pattern can be reproduced using a 2D numerical model, new 3D simulations, based on the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, show consistent advantages as presented herein. A Proper Orthogonal Decomposition was used to characterize the four most energetic modes of the meandering jet at the free surface level, allowing comparison against experimental data and 2D (depth-averaged) numerical results. Three different isotropic eddy viscosity models (RNG k-ε, k-ε, k-ω) were tested. The 3D models accurately predicted the frequency of the modes, whereas the amplitudes of the modes and associated energy were damped for the friction-dominant cases and augmented for non-frictional ones. The performance of the three turbulence models remained essentially similar, with slightly better predictions by RNG k-ε model in the case with the highest Reynolds number. Finally, the Q-criterion was used to identify vortices and study their dynamics, assisting on the identification of the differences between: i) the three-dimensional phenomenon (here reproduced), ii) its two-dimensional footprint in the free surface (experimental observations) and iii) the depth-averaged case (represented by 2D models).