Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (70)
- Article (64)
- Report (6)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Book (1)
- Poster (1)
Language
- English (146) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (146) (remove)
Keywords
- metal structure (4)
- steel (4)
- industrial research (3)
- iron and steel industry (3)
- materials technology (3)
- research report (3)
- building industry (2)
- building information modelling (2)
- building materials (2)
- energy efficiency (2)
- research project (2)
- resistance of materials (2)
- 20 fossil-fueled power plants (1)
- 3D printing (1)
- BIM (1)
- Energy system (1)
- Freshmen (1)
- HVAC (1)
- Hazard assessment (1)
- Hydraulic structures (1)
Institute
- Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen (146) (remove)
A comparative performance analysis of the CFD platforms OpenFOAM and FLOW-3D is presented, focusing on a 3D swirling turbulent flow: a steady hydraulic jump at low Reynolds number. Turbulence is treated using RANS approach RNG k-ε. A Volume Of Fluid (VOF) method is used to track the air–water interface, consequently aeration is modeled using an Eulerian–Eulerian approach. Structured meshes of cubic elements are used to discretize the channel geometry. The numerical model accuracy is assessed comparing representative hydraulic jump variables (sequent depth ratio, roller length, mean velocity profiles, velocity decay or free surface profile) to experimental data. The model results are also compared to previous studies to broaden the result validation. Both codes reproduced the phenomenon under study concurring with experimental data, although special care must be taken when swirling flows occur. Both models can be used to reproduce the hydraulic performance of energy dissipation structures at low Reynolds numbers.
Using optimization to design a renewable energy system has become a computationally demanding task as the high temporal fluctuations of demand and supply arise within the considered time series. The aggregation of typical operation periods has become a popular method to reduce effort. These operation periods are modelled independently and cannot interact in most cases. Consequently, seasonal storage is not reproducible. This inability can lead to a significant error, especially for energy systems with a high share of fluctuating renewable energy. The previous paper, “Time series aggregation for energy system design: Modeling seasonal storage”, has developed a seasonal storage model to address this issue. Simultaneously, the paper “Optimal design of multi-energy systems with seasonal storage” has developed a different approach. This paper aims to review these models and extend the first model. The extension is a mathematical reformulation to decrease the number of variables and constraints. Furthermore, it aims to reduce the calculation time while achieving the same results.