Refine
Year of publication
Institute
Document Type
- Article (74)
- Conference Proceeding (59)
- Part of a Book (9)
- Other (1)
- Report (1)
Keywords
- solar sail (5)
- Sonde (4)
- Eisschicht (3)
- GOSSAMER-1 (3)
- MASCOT (3)
- Mars (2)
- Solar sail (2)
- Spacecraft (2)
- Trajectory Optimization (2)
- multiple NEA rendezvous (2)
- small spacecraft (2)
- Analogue Environments (1)
- Antarctic Glaciology (1)
- Antarctica (1)
- Asteroid Deflection (1)
- Attitude dynamics (1)
- Autofluoreszenzverfahren (1)
- Automated Optimization (1)
- Cryobot (1)
- DLR-ESTEC GOSSAMER roadmap for solar sailing (1)
- Dekontamination (1)
- Evolutionary Neurocontrol (1)
- Extraterrestrial Glaciology (1)
- Glaciological instruments and methods (1)
- Gossamer (1)
- Gossamer structures (1)
- Hybrid Propellants (1)
- Ice Melting (1)
- Ice melting probe (1)
- Ice penetration (1)
- Icy Moons (1)
- Icy moons (1)
- Interplanetary flight (1)
- Interstellar objects (1)
- Jupiter (1)
- Lichtstreuungsbasierte Instrumente (1)
- Low-Thrust Propulsion (1)
- Melting Efficiency (1)
- Melting Performance (1)
- Melting Probe (1)
- Missions (1)
- Multiphase (1)
- Natriumhypochlorit (1)
- Ocean Worlds (1)
- Ocean worlds (1)
- Orbital dynamics (1)
- PHILAE (1)
- Planetary Protection (1)
- Planetary exploration (1)
- Reusable Rocket Engines (1)
- Sequence-Search (1)
- Small Solar System Body Lander (1)
- Small Spacecraft (1)
- Small spacecraft (1)
- Solar Power Sail (1)
- Solar Sail (1)
- Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization (1)
- Subclacial exploration (1)
- Subglacial lakes (1)
- Trajectories (1)
- Wasserstoffperoxid (1)
- asteroid lander (1)
- asteroid sample return (1)
- attitude dynamics (1)
- autofluorescence-based detection system (1)
- flotilla missions (1)
- habitability (1)
- heliosphere (1)
- ice moons (1)
- icy moons (1)
- ion propulsion (1)
- life detection (1)
- light scattering analysis (1)
- low-thrust (1)
- low-thrust trajectory optimization (1)
- near-Earth asteroid (1)
- orbit control (1)
- orbital dynamics (1)
- planetary defence (1)
- responsive space (1)
- sailcraft (1)
- sample return (1)
- small solar system body characterisation (1)
- small spacecraft asteroid lander (1)
- small spacecraft solar sail (1)
- solar sails (1)
- solar system (1)
- space missions (1)
- subglacial aquatic ecosystems (1)
- subsurface ice (1)
- subsurface ice research (1)
- subsurface probe (1)
- system engineering (1)
- underwater vehicle (1)
Interplanetary trajectories for low-thrust spacecraft are often characterized by multiple revolutions around the sun. Unfortunately, the convergence of traditional trajectory optimizers that are based on numerical optimal control methods depends strongly on an adequate initial guess for the control function (if a direct method is used) or for the starting values of the adjoint vector (if an indirect method is used). Especially when many revolutions around the sun are re-
quired, trajectory optimization becomes a very difficult and time-consuming task that involves a lot of experience and expert knowledge in astrodynamics and optimal control theory, because an adequate initial guess is extremely hard to find. Evolutionary neurocontrol (ENC) was proposed as a smart method for low-thrust trajectory optimization that fuses artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms to so-called evolutionary neurocontrollers (ENCs) [1]. Inspired by natural archetypes, ENC attacks the trajectoryoptimization problem from the perspective of artificial intelligence and machine learning, a perspective that is quite different from that of optimal control theory. Within the context of ENC, a trajectory is regarded as the result of a spacecraft steering strategy that maps permanently the actual spacecraft state and the actual target state onto the actual spacecraft control vector. This way, the problem of searching the optimal spacecraft trajectory is equivalent to the problem of searching (or "learning") the optimal spacecraft steering strategy. An artificial neural network is used to implement such a spacecraft steering strategy. It can be regarded as a parameterized function (the network function) that is defined by the internal network parameters. Therefore, each distinct set of network parameters defines a different network function and thus a different steering strategy. The problem of searching the optimal steering strategy is now equivalent to the problem of searching the optimal set of network parameters. Evolutionary algorithms that work on a population of (artificial) chromosomes are used to find the optimal network parameters, because the parameters can be easily mapped onto a chromosome. The trajectory optimization problem is solved when the optimal chromosome is found. A comparison of solar sail trajectories that have been published by others [2, 3, 4, 5] with ENC-trajectories has shown that ENCs can be successfully applied for near-globally optimal spacecraft control [1, 6] and that they are able to find trajectories that are closer to the (unknown) global optimum, because they explore the trajectory search space more exhaustively than a human expert can do. The obtained trajectories are fairly accurate with respect to the terminal constraint. If a more accurate trajectory is required, the ENC-solution can be used as an initial guess for a local trajectory optimization method. Using ENC, low-thrust trajectories can be optimized without an initial guess and without expert attendance.
Here, new results for nuclear electric spacecraft and for solar sail spacecraft are presented and it will be shown that ENCs find very good trajectories even for very difficult problems. Trajectory optimization results are presented for 1. NASA's Solar Polar Imager Mission, a mission to attain a highly inclined close solar orbit with a solar sail [7] 2. a mission to de ect asteroid Apophis with a solar sail from a retrograde orbit with a very-high velocity impact [8, 9] 3. JPL's \2nd Global Trajectory Optimization Competition", a grand tour to visit four asteroids from different classes with a NEP spacecraft
The so-called "compound solar sail", also known as "Solar Photon Thruster" (SPT), is a solar sail design concept, for which the two basic functions of the solar sail, namely light collection and thrust direction, are uncoupled. In this paper, we introduce a novel SPT concept, termed the Advanced Solar Photon Thruster (ASPT). This model does not suffer from the simplified assumptions that have been made for the analysis of compound solar sails in previous studies. We present the equations that describe the force, which acts on the ASPT. After a detailed design analysis, the performance of the ASPT with respect to the conventional flat solar sail (FSS) is investigated for three interplanetary mission scenarios: An Earth-Venus rendezvous, where the solar sail has to spiral towards the Sun, an Earth-Mars rendezvous, where the solar sail has to spiral away from the Sun, and an Earth-NEA rendezvous (to near-Earth asteroid 1996FG3), where a large orbital eccentricity change is required. The investigated solar sails have realistic near-term characteristic accelerations between 0.1 and 0.2mm/s2. Our results show that a SPT is not superior to the flat solar sail unless very idealistic assumptions are made.
Within ESA's Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 plan, a mission to explore the Saturnian System, with special emphasis on its two moons Titan and Enceladus, was selected for study, termed TANDEM (Titan and Enceladus Mission). In this paper, we describe an optimized mission design for a TANDEM-derived solar electric propulsion (SEP) mission. We have chosen the SEP mission scenario for the interplanetary transfer of the TANDEM spacecraft because all feasible gravity assist sequences for a chemical transfer between 2015 and 2025 result in long flight times of about nine years. Our SEP system is based on the German RIT ion engine. For our optimized mission design, we have extensively explored the SEP parameter space (specific impulse, thrust level, power level) and have calculated an optimal interplanetary trajectory for each setting. In contrast to the original TANDEM mission concept, which intends to use two launch vehicles and an all-chemical transfer, our SEP mission design requires only a single Ariane 5 ECA launch for the same payload mass. Without gravity assist, it yields a faster and more flexible transfer with a fight time of less than seven years, and an increased payload ratio. Our mission design proves thereby the capability of SEP even for missions into the outer solar system.