Refine
Year of publication
Institute
Language
- English (139)
- German (114)
- Multiple languages (1)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (129)
- Article (81)
- Part of a Book (27)
- Book (10)
- Report (3)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (1)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- Earthquake (5)
- Seismic design (4)
- INODIS (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Seismic loading (3)
- earthquakes (3)
- Adjacent buildings (2)
- Historical centres (2)
- INSYSME (2)
- Masonry infill (2)
- Shake table test (2)
- Stone masonry (2)
- Tanks (2)
- industrial facilities (2)
- installations (2)
- piping (2)
- seismic design (2)
- seismic loading (2)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Ausfachungsmauerwerk (1)
- BIM (1)
- Basisisolierung (1)
- Bauwerksüberwachung (1)
- Behaviour factor q (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Blind prediction competition (1)
- Capacity Curve (1)
- Cardiovascular MRI (1)
- Civil engineering (1)
- Components (1)
- DIN EN 1996 (1)
- Decoupling (1)
- Design examples (1)
- EN 1998-4 (1)
- ESHM20, industrial facilities (1)
- Earthquake Engineering (1)
- Emilia-Romagna earthquake (1)
- Empirical consequence curves (1)
- Empirical fragility functions (1)
- Erdbeben (1)
- Erdbebeneinwirkung (1)
- Eurocode 8 (1)
- Frame structure (1)
- Genetic algorithm (1)
- Gust wind response (1)
- In- plane damage (1)
- In-plane (1)
- In-plane load (1)
- In-plane performance, isolation (1)
- Industrial facilities (1)
- Industrial units (1)
- Infill wall design (1)
- Interaction (1)
- Isolation (1)
- Left ventriular function (1)
- Linear elastic analysis (1)
- MR-stethoscope (1)
- Magnetic field strength (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1)
- Masonry partition walls (1)
- Masonry structures (1)
- Mauerwerksbauten (1)
- Mauerwerksgebäude (1)
- Modern constructions (1)
- Momentenverteilung (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Tree Search (1)
- Multi-storey (1)
- Neo-Deterministic (1)
- Numerical modelling (1)
- Out-of-plane (1)
- Out-of-plane capacity (1)
- Out-of-plane failure (1)
- Out-of-plane strength (1)
- PBEE (1)
- Piping (1)
- Precast buildings (1)
- Pushover analysis (1)
- PushoverAnalysen (1)
- RC frames (1)
- Rahmentragwirkung (1)
- Reinforced concrete frame (1)
- Response spectrum (1)
- Seismic (1)
- Seismic Hazard (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Silos (1)
- Slab deflection (1)
- Spectral analysis (1)
- Stahlbetonrahmen (1)
- Structural design (1)
- Structural health monitoring (1)
- Tank (1)
- Unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- Unreinforced masonry walls (1)
- Verhaltensbeiwerte (1)
- Vulnerability Curves (1)
- Wand-Decken-Interaktion (1)
- Wind turbulence (1)
- Window opening (1)
- Ziegelmauerwerk (1)
- behaviour factor q (1)
- body limbs (1)
- cardiac gating (1)
- cardiovascular MR imaging (1)
- churches (1)
- connection detail (1)
- deserts (1)
- early warning and response system (1)
- earthquake (1)
- earthquake engineering (1)
- elastomeric bearing (1)
- electrocardiogram (1)
- equivalent stiffness (1)
- finite element method (1)
- fluid structure interaction (1)
- fragility curves (1)
- friction pendulum bearing (1)
- granular silo (1)
- high field MR imaging (1)
- hypoplasticity (1)
- impulsive effects (1)
- in-plane (1)
- in-plane and out-of-plane failure (1)
- in-plane behaviour (1)
- integration SHM in BIM (1)
- interconnected sensor systems (1)
- linear elastic analysis; (1)
- liquid storage tank (1)
- liquid-storage tank (1)
- liquid-structure interaction (1)
- lizards (1)
- macro-element (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- masonry infill (1)
- masonry structures (1)
- modern constructions (1)
- nonlinear transient analyses (1)
- out-of-plane (1)
- out-of-plane behaviour (1)
- phonocardiogram (1)
- safety control (1)
- seismic (1)
- seismic hazard (1)
- seismic isolation (1)
- seismic response (1)
- seismic risk (1)
- seismic structural damage detection via SHM (1)
- seismic vulnerability (1)
- simplified approach (1)
- structure-soil-structure interaction (1)
- swimming (1)
- truss (1)
- unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- vault (1)
- vocal fold oscillation (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (254)
Because of simple construction process, high energy efficiency, significant fire resistance and excellent sound isolation, masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures are very popular in most of the countries in the world, as well as in seismic active areas. However, many RC frame structures with masonry infills were seriously damaged during earthquake events, as the traditional infills are generally constructed with direct contact to the RC frame which brings undesirable infill/frame interaction. This interaction leads to the activation of the equivalent diagonal strut in the infill panel, due to the RC frame deformation, and combined with seismically induced loads perpendicular to the infill panel often causes total collapses of the masonry infills and heavy damages to the RC frames. This fact was the motivation for developing different approaches for improving the behaviour of masonry infills, where infill isolation (decoupling) from the frame has been more intensively studied in the last decade. In-plane isolation of the infill wall reduces infill activation, but causes the need for additional measures to restrain out-of-plane movements. This can be provided by installing steel anchors, as proposed by some researchers. Within the framework of European research project INSYSME (Innovative Systems for Earthquake Resistant Masonry Enclosures in Reinforced Concrete Buildings) the system based on a use of elastomers for in-plane decoupling and steel anchors for out-of-plane restrain was tested. This constructive solution was tested and deeply investigated during the experimental campaign where traditional and decoupled masonry infilled RC frames with anchors were subjected to separate and combined in-plane and out-of-plane loading. Based on a detailed evaluation and comparison of the test results, the performance and effectiveness of the developed system are illustrated.
Seismic excited liquid filled tanks are subjected to extreme loading due to hydrodynamic pressures, which can lead to nonlinear stability failure of the thinwalled cylindrical tanks, as it is known from past earthquakes. A significant reduction of the seismically induced loads can be obtained by the application of base isolation systems, which have to be designed carefully with respect to the modified hydrodynamic behaviour of the tank in interaction with the liquid. For this reason a highly sophisticated fluid-structure interaction model has to be applied for a realistic simulation of the overall dynamic system. In the following, such a model is presented and compared with the results of simplified mathematical models for rigidly supported tanks. Finally, it is examined to what extent a simple mechanical model can represent the behaviour of a base isolated tank in case of seismic excitation
Experimental investigation of behaviour of masonry infilled RC frames under out-of-plane loading
(2021)
Masonry infills are commonly used as exterior or interior walls in reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures and they can be encountered all over the world, including earthquake prone regions. Since the middle of the 20th century the behaviour of these non-structural elements under seismic loading has been studied in numerous experimental campaigns. However, most of the studies were carried out by means of in-plane tests, while there is a lack of out-of-plane experimental investigations. In this paper, the out-of-plane tests carried out on full scale masonry infilled frames are described. The results of the out-of-plane tests are presented in terms of force-displacement curves and measured out-of-plane displacements. Finally, the reliability of existing analytical approaches developed to estimate the out-of-plane strength of masonry infills is examined on presented experimental results.
Reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls are popular form of construction all over the world as well in seismic regions. While severe earthquakes can cause high level of damage of both reinforced concrete and masonry infills, earthquakes of lower to medium intensity some-times can cause significant level of damage of masonry infill walls. Especially important is the level of damage of face loaded infill masonry walls (out-of-plane direction) as out-of-plane load cannot only bring high level of damage to the wall, it can also be life-threating for the people near the wall. The response in out-of-plane direction directly depends on the prior in-plane damage, as previous investigation shown that it decreases resistance capacity of the in-fills. Behaviour of infill masonry walls with and without prior in-plane load is investigated in the experimental campaign and the results are presented in this paper. These results are later compared with analytical approaches for the out-of-plane resistance from the literature. Conclusions based on the experimental campaign on the influence of prior in-plane damage on the out-of-plane response of infill walls are compared with the conclusions from other authors who investigated the same problematic.
In many historical centers in Europe, stone masonry is part of building aggregates, which developed when the layout of the city or village was densified. The analysis of such building aggregates is very challenging and modelling guidelines missing. Advances in the development of analysis methods have been impeded by the lack of experimental data on the seismic response of such aggregates. The SERA project AIMS (Seismic Testing of Adjacent Interacting Masonry Structures) provides such experimental data by testing an aggregate of two buildings under two horizontal components of dynamic excitation. With the aim to advance the modelling of unreinforced masonry aggregates, a blind prediction competition is organized before the experimental campaign. Each group has been provided a complete set of construction drawings, material properties, testing sequence and the list of measurements to be reported. The applied modelling approaches span from equivalent frame models to Finite Element models using shell elements and discrete element models with solid elements. This paper compares the first entries, regarding the modelling approaches, results in terms of base shear, roof displacements, interface openings, and the failure modes.
In many historical centres in Europe, stone masonry buildings are part of building aggregates, which developed when the layout of the city or village was densified. In these aggregates, adjacent buildings share structural walls to support floors and roofs. Meanwhile, the masonry walls of the façades of adjacent buildings are often connected by dry joints since adjacent buildings were constructed at different times. Observations after for example the recent Central Italy earthquakes showed that the dry joints between the building units were often the first elements to be damaged. As a result, the joints opened up leading to pounding between the building units and a complicated interaction at floor and roof beam supports. The analysis of such building aggregates is very challenging and modelling guidelines do not exist. Advances in the development of analysis methods have been impeded by the lack of experimental data on the seismic response of such aggregates. The objective of the project AIMS (Seismic Testing of Adjacent Interacting Masonry Structures), included in the H2020 project SERA, is to provide such experimental data by testing an aggregate of two buildings under two horizontal components of dynamic
excitation. The test unit is built at half-scale, with a two-storey building and a one-storey building. The buildings share one common wall while the façade walls are connected by dry joints. The floors are at different heights leading to a complex dynamic response of this smallest possible building aggregate. The shake table test is conducted at the LNEC seismic testing facility. The testing sequence comprises four levels of shaking: 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of nominal shaking table capacity. Extensive instrumentation, including accelerometers, displacement transducers and optical measurement systems, provides detailed information on the building aggregate response. Special attention is paid to the interface opening, the globa