Refine
Year of publication
Institute
Has Fulltext
- no (22) (remove)
Language
- English (22)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Article (3)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- Diversity Management (4)
- Diversity (2)
- Engineering Habitus (2)
- Human-robot collaboration (2)
- Innovation Management (2)
- Organizational Culture (2)
- cyber physical production system (2)
- digital shadow (2)
- engineering education (2)
- Academia (1)
- Acceptance (1)
- Anti-Bias (1)
- Antibias (1)
- Best practice sharing (1)
- Change Management (1)
- Change management (1)
- Cognitive assistance system (1)
- Corporate Culture (1)
- Digital leadership (1)
- Digitalization (1)
- Diversity management (1)
- Engineering (1)
- Engineering Education (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Gender (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- Human factors (1)
- Human-centered work design (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Leadership (1)
- Organizational culture (1)
- Perception (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Psychological concepts (1)
- Responsibility (1)
- best practice (1)
- change management (1)
- cyber-physical production system (1)
- digital twin (1)
- diversity (1)
- diversity management (1)
- engineering (1)
- gender and diversity (1)
- human digital shadow (1)
- human factors (1)
- human-machine interface (1)
- innovation (1)
- innovation management (1)
- internet of production (1)
- research association (1)
- social responsible engineering (1)
- teaching (1)
- user & usage (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (22)
Like all preceding transformations of the manufacturing industry, the large-scale usage of production data will reshape the role of humans within the sociotechnical production ecosystem. To ensure that this transformation creates work systems in which employees are empowered, productive, healthy, and motivated, the transformation must be guided by principles of and research on human-centered work design. Specifically, measures must be taken at all levels of work design, ranging from (1) the work tasks to (2) the working conditions to (3) the organizational level and (4) the supra-organizational level. We present selected research across all four levels that showcase the opportunities and requirements that surface when striving for human-centered work design for the Internet of Production (IoP). (1) On the work task level, we illustrate the user-centered design of human-robot collaboration (HRC) and process planning in the composite industry as well as user-centered design factors for cognitive assistance systems. (2) On the working conditions level, we present a newly developed framework for the classification of HRC workplaces. (3) Moving to the organizational level, we show how corporate data can be used to facilitate best practice sharing in production networks, and we discuss the implications of the IoP for new leadership models. Finally, (4) on the supra-organizational level, we examine overarching ethical dimensions, investigating, e.g., how the new work contexts affect our understanding of responsibility and normative values such as autonomy and privacy. Overall, these interdisciplinary research perspectives highlight the importance and necessary scope of considering the human factor in the IoP.
Antibias training is increasingly demanded and practiced in academia and industry to increase employees’ sensitivity to discrimination, racism, and diversity. Under the heading of “Diversity Management,” antibias trainings are mainly offered as one-off workshops intending to raise awareness of unconscious biases, create a diversity-affirming corporate culture, promote awareness of the potential of
diversity, and ultimately enable the reflection of diversity in development processes. However, coming from childhood education, research and scientific articles on the sustainable effectiveness of antibias in adulthood, especially in academia, are very scarce. In order to fill this research gap, the article aims to explore how sustainable the effects of individual antibias trainings on participants’ behavior are. In order to investigate this, participant observation in a qualitative pre–post setting was conducted, analyzing antibias training in an academic context. Two observers actively participated in the training sessions and documented the activities and reflection processes of the participants. Overall, the results question the effectiveness of single antibias trainings and show that a target-group adaptive approach is mandatory owing to the background of the approach in early childhood education. Therefore, antibias work needs to be adapted to the target group’s needs and realities of life. Furthermore, the study reveals that single antibias trainings must be embedded in a holistic diversity management approach to stimulate sustainable reflection processes among the target group. This article is one of the first to scientifically evaluate antibias training effectiveness, especially in engineering sciences and the university context.