Refine
Year of publication
Institute
Has Fulltext
- no (246) (remove)
Language
- English (132)
- German (113)
- Multiple languages (1)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (121)
- Article (81)
- Part of a Book (27)
- Book (10)
- Report (3)
- Conference: Meeting Abstract (1)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Talk (1)
Keywords
- Earthquake (5)
- Seismic design (4)
- INODIS (3)
- Out-of-plane load (3)
- Seismic loading (3)
- earthquakes (3)
- Adjacent buildings (2)
- Historical centres (2)
- INSYSME (2)
- Masonry infill (2)
- Shake table test (2)
- Stone masonry (2)
- Tanks (2)
- industrial facilities (2)
- installations (2)
- piping (2)
- seismic design (2)
- seismic loading (2)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Ausfachungsmauerwerk (1)
- BIM (1)
- Basisisolierung (1)
- Bauwerksüberwachung (1)
- Behaviour factor q (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Blind prediction competition (1)
- Capacity Curve (1)
- Cardiovascular MRI (1)
- Civil engineering (1)
- Components (1)
- DIN EN 1996 (1)
- Decoupling (1)
- Design examples (1)
- EN 1998-4 (1)
- ESHM20, industrial facilities (1)
- Earthquake Engineering (1)
- Emilia-Romagna earthquake (1)
- Empirical consequence curves (1)
- Empirical fragility functions (1)
- Erdbeben (1)
- Erdbebeneinwirkung (1)
- Eurocode 8 (1)
- Frame structure (1)
- Genetic algorithm (1)
- Gust wind response (1)
- In- plane damage (1)
- In-plane (1)
- In-plane load (1)
- In-plane performance, isolation (1)
- Industrial facilities (1)
- Industrial units (1)
- Infill wall design (1)
- Interaction (1)
- Isolation (1)
- Left ventriular function (1)
- Linear elastic analysis (1)
- MR-stethoscope (1)
- Magnetic field strength (1)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1)
- Masonry partition walls (1)
- Masonry structures (1)
- Mauerwerksbauten (1)
- Mauerwerksgebäude (1)
- Modern constructions (1)
- Momentenverteilung (1)
- Monitoring (1)
- Monte Carlo Tree Search (1)
- Multi-storey (1)
- Neo-Deterministic (1)
- Numerical modelling (1)
- Out-of-plane (1)
- Out-of-plane capacity (1)
- Out-of-plane failure (1)
- Out-of-plane strength (1)
- PBEE (1)
- Piping (1)
- Precast buildings (1)
- Pushover analysis (1)
- PushoverAnalysen (1)
- RC frames (1)
- Rahmentragwirkung (1)
- Reinforced concrete frame (1)
- Response spectrum (1)
- Seismic (1)
- Seismic Hazard (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Silos (1)
- Slab deflection (1)
- Spectral analysis (1)
- Stahlbetonrahmen (1)
- Structural design (1)
- Structural health monitoring (1)
- Tank (1)
- Unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- Unreinforced masonry walls (1)
- Verhaltensbeiwerte (1)
- Vulnerability Curves (1)
- Wand-Decken-Interaktion (1)
- Wind turbulence (1)
- Window opening (1)
- Ziegelmauerwerk (1)
- behaviour factor q (1)
- body limbs (1)
- cardiac gating (1)
- cardiovascular MR imaging (1)
- churches (1)
- connection detail (1)
- deserts (1)
- early warning and response system (1)
- earthquake (1)
- earthquake engineering (1)
- elastomeric bearing (1)
- electrocardiogram (1)
- equivalent stiffness (1)
- finite element method (1)
- fluid structure interaction (1)
- fragility curves (1)
- friction pendulum bearing (1)
- granular silo (1)
- high field MR imaging (1)
- hypoplasticity (1)
- impulsive effects (1)
- in-plane (1)
- in-plane and out-of-plane failure (1)
- in-plane behaviour (1)
- integration SHM in BIM (1)
- interconnected sensor systems (1)
- linear elastic analysis; (1)
- liquid storage tank (1)
- liquid-storage tank (1)
- liquid-structure interaction (1)
- lizards (1)
- macro-element (1)
- magnetic resonance imaging (1)
- masonry infill (1)
- masonry structures (1)
- modern constructions (1)
- nonlinear transient analyses (1)
- out-of-plane (1)
- out-of-plane behaviour (1)
- phonocardiogram (1)
- safety control (1)
- seismic (1)
- seismic hazard (1)
- seismic isolation (1)
- seismic response (1)
- seismic risk (1)
- seismic structural damage detection via SHM (1)
- seismic vulnerability (1)
- simplified approach (1)
- structure-soil-structure interaction (1)
- swimming (1)
- truss (1)
- unreinforced masonry buildings (1)
- vault (1)
- vocal fold oscillation (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (246)
Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a search technique that in the last decade emerged as a major breakthrough for Artificial Intelligence applications regarding board- and video-games. In 2016, AlphaGo, an MCTS-based software agent, outperformed the human world champion of the board game Go. This game was for long considered almost infeasible for machines, due to its immense search space and the need for a long-term strategy. Since this historical success, MCTS is considered as an effective new approach for many other scientific and technical problems. Interestingly, civil structural engineering, as a discipline, offers many tasks whose solution may benefit from intelligent search and in particular from adopting MCTS as a search tool. In this work, we show how MCTS can be adapted to search for suitable solutions of a structural engineering design problem. The problem consists of choosing the load-bearing elements in a reference reinforced concrete structure, so to achieve a set of specific dynamic characteristics. In the paper, we report the results obtained by applying both a plain and a hybrid version of single-agent MCTS. The hybrid approach consists of an integration of both MCTS and classic Genetic Algorithm (GA), the latter also serving as a term of comparison for the results. The study’s outcomes may open new perspectives for the adoption of MCTS as a design tool for civil engineers.
Erdbebennachweis von Mauerwerksbauten mit realistischen Modellen und erhöhten Verhaltensbeiwerten
(2021)
Die Anwendung des linearen Nachweiskonzepts auf Mauerwerksbauten führt dazu, dass bereits heute Standsicherheitsnachweise für Gebäude mit üblichen Grundrissen in Gebieten mit moderaten Erdbebeneinwirkungen nicht mehr geführt werden können. Diese Problematik wird sich in Deutschland mit der Einführung kontinuierlicher probabilistischer Erdbebenkarten weiter verschärfen. Aufgrund der Erhöhung der seismischen Einwirkungen, die sich vielerorts ergibt, ist es erforderlich, die vorhandenen, bislang nicht berücksichtigten Tragfähigkeitsreserven in nachvollziehbaren Nachweiskonzepten in der Baupraxis verfügbar zu machen. Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt ein Konzept für die gebäudespezifische Ermittlung von erhöhten Verhaltensbeiwerten vor. Die Verhaltensbeiwerte setzen sich aus drei Anteilen zusammen, mit denen die Lastumverteilung im Grundriss, die Verformungsfähigkeit und Energiedissipation sowie die Überfestigkeiten berücksichtigt werden. Für die rechnerische Ermittlung dieser drei Anteile wird ein nichtlineares Nachweiskonzept auf Grundlage von Pushover-Analysen vorgeschlagen, in denen die Interaktionen von Wänden und Geschossdecken durch einen Einspanngrad beschrieben werden. Für die Bestimmung der Einspanngrade wird ein nichtlinearer Modellierungsansatz eingeführt, mit dem die Interaktion von Wänden und Decken abgebildet werden kann. Die Anwendung des Konzepts mit erhöhten gebäudespezifischen Verhaltensbeiwerten wird am Beispiel eines Mehrfamilienhauses aus Kalksandsteinen demonstriert. Die Ergebnisse der linearen Nachweise mit erhöhten Verhaltensbeiwerten für dieses Gebäude liegen deutlich näher an den Ergebnissen nichtlinearer Nachweise und somit bleiben übliche Grundrisse in Erdbebengebieten mit den traditionellen linearen Rechenansätzen nachweisbar.
Because of simple construction process, high energy efficiency, significant fire resistance and excellent sound isolation, masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures are very popular in most of the countries in the world, as well as in seismic active areas. However, many RC frame structures with masonry infills were seriously damaged during earthquake events, as the traditional infills are generally constructed with direct contact to the RC frame which brings undesirable infill/frame interaction. This interaction leads to the activation of the equivalent diagonal strut in the infill panel, due to the RC frame deformation, and combined with seismically induced loads perpendicular to the infill panel often causes total collapses of the masonry infills and heavy damages to the RC frames. This fact was the motivation for developing different approaches for improving the behaviour of masonry infills, where infill isolation (decoupling) from the frame has been more intensively studied in the last decade. In-plane isolation of the infill wall reduces infill activation, but causes the need for additional measures to restrain out-of-plane movements. This can be provided by installing steel anchors, as proposed by some researchers. Within the framework of European research project INSYSME (Innovative Systems for Earthquake Resistant Masonry Enclosures in Reinforced Concrete Buildings) the system based on a use of elastomers for in-plane decoupling and steel anchors for out-of-plane restrain was tested. This constructive solution was tested and deeply investigated during the experimental campaign where traditional and decoupled masonry infilled RC frames with anchors were subjected to separate and combined in-plane and out-of-plane loading. Based on a detailed evaluation and comparison of the test results, the performance and effectiveness of the developed system are illustrated.
Seismic excited liquid filled tanks are subjected to extreme loading due to hydrodynamic pressures, which can lead to nonlinear stability failure of the thinwalled cylindrical tanks, as it is known from past earthquakes. A significant reduction of the seismically induced loads can be obtained by the application of base isolation systems, which have to be designed carefully with respect to the modified hydrodynamic behaviour of the tank in interaction with the liquid. For this reason a highly sophisticated fluid-structure interaction model has to be applied for a realistic simulation of the overall dynamic system. In the following, such a model is presented and compared with the results of simplified mathematical models for rigidly supported tanks. Finally, it is examined to what extent a simple mechanical model can represent the behaviour of a base isolated tank in case of seismic excitation
Experimental investigation of behaviour of masonry infilled RC frames under out-of-plane loading
(2021)
Masonry infills are commonly used as exterior or interior walls in reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures and they can be encountered all over the world, including earthquake prone regions. Since the middle of the 20th century the behaviour of these non-structural elements under seismic loading has been studied in numerous experimental campaigns. However, most of the studies were carried out by means of in-plane tests, while there is a lack of out-of-plane experimental investigations. In this paper, the out-of-plane tests carried out on full scale masonry infilled frames are described. The results of the out-of-plane tests are presented in terms of force-displacement curves and measured out-of-plane displacements. Finally, the reliability of existing analytical approaches developed to estimate the out-of-plane strength of masonry infills is examined on presented experimental results.
Reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls are popular form of construction all over the world as well in seismic regions. While severe earthquakes can cause high level of damage of both reinforced concrete and masonry infills, earthquakes of lower to medium intensity some-times can cause significant level of damage of masonry infill walls. Especially important is the level of damage of face loaded infill masonry walls (out-of-plane direction) as out-of-plane load cannot only bring high level of damage to the wall, it can also be life-threating for the people near the wall. The response in out-of-plane direction directly depends on the prior in-plane damage, as previous investigation shown that it decreases resistance capacity of the in-fills. Behaviour of infill masonry walls with and without prior in-plane load is investigated in the experimental campaign and the results are presented in this paper. These results are later compared with analytical approaches for the out-of-plane resistance from the literature. Conclusions based on the experimental campaign on the influence of prior in-plane damage on the out-of-plane response of infill walls are compared with the conclusions from other authors who investigated the same problematic.