Refine
Institute
Has Fulltext
- no (18)
Document Type
- Article (18) (remove)
Keywords
- Empirical process (2)
- Goodness-of-fit test (2)
- Independence test (2)
- Paired sample (2)
- Parametric bootstrap (2)
- likelihood ratio test (2)
- not identically distributed (2)
- Bahadur efficiency (1)
- Bootstrap (1)
- Bootstrapping (1)
- Brownian Pillow (1)
- Categorial variable (1)
- Collective risk model (1)
- Concomitant (1)
- Coverage probability (1)
- Cramér-von-Mises statistic (1)
- Cramér-von-Mises test (1)
- Crámer–von-Mises distance (1)
- Equivalence test (1)
- Functional Delta Method (1)
- Gamma distribution (1)
- Goodness-of-fit tests for uniformity (1)
- Hadamard differentiability (1)
- Hoeffding-Blum-Kiefer-Rosenblatt independence test (1)
- Hotelling’s T² test (1)
- Incomplete data (1)
- Integrated empirical distribution (survival) function (1)
- Kernel density estimator (1)
- Length of confidence intervals (1)
- Marginal homogeneity test (1)
- Multi-sample problem (1)
- Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms (1)
- Pitman efficiency (1)
- Resampling test (1)
- Vapnik–Čhervonenkis class (1)
- Volume of confidence regions (1)
- Wilcoxon tests (1)
- allocation (1)
- asymptotic relative efficiency (1)
- bootstrap (1)
- central symmetry test (1)
- complete block symmetry (1)
- conditional excess distribution (1)
- conditional expectation principle (1)
- confidence interval (1)
- covariance principle (1)
- exchangeability test (1)
- forecast (1)
- functional data (1)
- goodness-of-fit test (1)
- huge dimensional data (1)
- independence test (1)
- multinomial distribution (1)
- multivariate normal distribution (1)
- portfolio risk (1)
- random effects (1)
- random effects meta-regression model (1)
- separable Hilbert space (1)
- uniformly most powerful invariant test (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (18)
Hotelling’s T² tests in paired and independent survey samples are compared using the traditional asymptotic efficiency concepts of Hodges–Lehmann, Bahadur and Pitman, as well as through criteria based on the volumes of corresponding confidence regions. Conditions characterizing the superiority of a procedure are given in terms of population canonical correlation type coefficients. Statistical tests for checking these conditions are developed. Test statistics based on the eigenvalues of a symmetrized sample cross-covariance matrix are suggested, as well as test statistics based on sample canonical correlation type coefficients.